IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jes/wpaper/y2014v6i3p103-116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discriminator Credibility Dimensions Of An Online Acquisition Website – An Analysis Of An International Construct On A Specific Romanian Target

Author

Listed:
  • Oana TUGULEA

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration within Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify credibility dimensions that predict the level of credibility of an online sales clothes Website in Romania. The objectives of this research are: (1) identifying the online sales clothes Websites’ credibility dimensions that better discriminate between students to evaluate an online sales clothes Website to be credible or not credible; (2) creating a discriminant function to predict to which of the two analysed groups one user better fits; (3) identifying dimensions that discriminate students between the two groups for two specific situation: second year of study students and third year of study students. For the overall group, the most important discriminator dimension is real world feel. For second year of study students, the only discriminator is trustworthiness. Among the most important discriminating dimensions for third year of study students are real world feel and ease of use.

Suggested Citation

  • Oana TUGULEA, 2014. "Discriminator Credibility Dimensions Of An Online Acquisition Website – An Analysis Of An International Construct On A Specific Romanian Target," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 6(3), pages 103-116, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:jes:wpaper:y:2014:v:6:i:3:p:103-116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ceswp.uaic.ro/articles/CESWP2014_VI3_TUG.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Traci Hong, 2006. "The influence of structural and message features on Web site credibility," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 57(1), pages 114-127, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oana TUGULEA & Claudia BOBALCA, 2016. "To Buy Or Not To Buy From The Internet: Reasons To Behave In A Certain Manner In An International Online Commerce Society," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 8(2), pages 313-332, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oana ȚUGULEA & Andreia Gabriela ANDREI & Claudia STOIAN BOBÂLCĂ & Adriana MANOLICĂ, 2017. "Online Buyer's Perspective of E-shops Credibility: Measurement Dimensions," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(4), pages 641-661, December.
    2. Xiao, Xinning & Shailer, Greg, 2022. "Stakeholders’ perceptions of factors affecting the credibility of sustainability reports," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    3. Christopher D. Allport & John A. Pendley, 2010. "The impact of website design on the perceived credibility of internet financial reporting," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(3‐4), pages 127-141, July.
    4. Tugulea Oana, 2014. "What Dimensions Discriminate Users To Consider A Presentation Website To Be Credible Or Not Credible?," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 207-214, August.
    5. Supratim Kundu & Swapnajit Chakraborti, 2022. "A comparative study of online consumer reviews of Apple iPhone across Amazon, Twitter and MouthShut platforms," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 925-950, September.
    6. Oana TUGULEA & Claudia STOIAN (BOBALCA), 2017. "Credibility Of Websites Through Facets And Dimensions," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(1), pages 115-123, May.
    7. Hsu, Hsuan Yu & Tsou, Hung-Tai, 2011. "Understanding customer experiences in online blog environments," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 510-523.
    8. Kumar, Jeetesh & Konar, Rupam & Balasubramanian, Kandappan, 2020. "The Impact Of Social Media On Consumers’ Purchasing Behaviour In Malaysian Restaurants," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 8(3), pages 197-216.
    9. Ageeva, Elena & Melewar, T.C. & Foroudi, Pantea & Dennis, Charles, 2019. "Cues adopted by consumers in examining corporate website favorability: An empirical study of financial institutions in the UK and Russia," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 15-32.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    credibility; Website; discriminant analysis; dimension; construct;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • M39 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jes:wpaper:y:2014:v:6:i:3:p:103-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alupului Ciprian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csjesro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.