IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jas/jasssj/2017-70-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining Collusion and Voting Biases Between Countries During the Eurovision Song Contest Since 1957

Author

Listed:

Abstract

The Eurovision Song Contest (ESC) is an annual event which attracts millions of viewers. It is an interesting activity to examine since the participants of the competition represent a particular country's musical performance that will be awarded a set of scores from other participating countries based upon a quality assessment of a performance. There is a question of whether the countries will vote exclusively according to the artistic merit of the song, or if the vote will be a public signal of national support for another country. Since the competition aims to bring people together, any consistent biases in the awarding of scores would defeat the purpose of the celebration of expression and this has attracted researchers to investigate the supporting evidence for biases. This paper builds upon an approach which produces a set of random samples from an unbiased distribution of score allocation, and extends the methodology to use the full set of years of the competition's life span which has seen fundamental changes to the voting schemes adopted. By building up networks from statistically significant edge sets of vote allocations during a set of years, the results display a plausible network for the origins of the culture anchors for the preferences of the awarded votes. With 60 years of data, the results support the hypothesis of regional collusion and biases arising from proximity, culture and other irrelevant factors in regards to the music which that alone is intended to affect the judgment of the contest.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander V. Mantzaris & Samuel R. Rein & Alexander D. Hopkins, 2018. "Examining Collusion and Voting Biases Between Countries During the Eurovision Song Contest Since 1957," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 21(1), pages 1-1.
    • Handle: RePEc:jas:jasssj:2017-70-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jasss.org/21/1/1/1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laura Spierdijk & Michel Vellekoop, 2009. "The structure of bias in peer voting systems: lessons from the Eurovision Song Contest," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 403-425, May.
    2. Saavedra, Serguei & Efstathiou, Janet & Reed-Tsochas, Felix, 2007. "Identifying the underlying structure and dynamic interactions in a voting network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 377(2), pages 672-688.
    3. Chaoming Song & Shlomo Havlin & Hernán A. Makse, 2005. "Self-similarity of complex networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 433(7024), pages 392-395, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. P. Battiston & M. Magnani & D. Paolini & L. Rossi, 2024. "Country vs. Music: Strategic Incentives for Competing Voters," Economics Department Working Papers 2024-EP02, Department of Economics, Parma University (Italy).
    2. Alexander V. Mantzaris & Samuel R. Rein & Alexander D. Hopkins, 2018. "Preference and neglect amongst countries in the Eurovision Song Contest," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 377-390, September.
    3. Budzinski, Oliver & Gänßle, Sophia & Weimar, Daniel, 2023. "Disentangling individual biases in jury voting: An empirical analysis of voting behavior in the Eurovision Song Contest," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 171, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander V. Mantzaris & Samuel R. Rein & Alexander D. Hopkins, 2018. "Preference and neglect amongst countries in the Eurovision Song Contest," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 377-390, September.
    2. Budzinski, Oliver & Gänßle, Sophia & Weimar, Daniel, 2023. "Disentangling individual biases in jury voting: An empirical analysis of voting behavior in the Eurovision Song Contest," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 171, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    3. Pannicke, Julia, 2015. "Abstimmungsverhalten im Bundesvision Song Contest: Regionale Nähe versus Qualität der Musik," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 95, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    4. Zhou, Wei-Xing & Jiang, Zhi-Qiang & Sornette, Didier, 2007. "Exploring self-similarity of complex cellular networks: The edge-covering method with simulated annealing and log-periodic sampling," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 375(2), pages 741-752.
    5. Werner, Gerhard, 2013. "Consciousness viewed in the framework of brain phase space dynamics, criticality, and the Renormalization Group," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 3-12.
    6. Budzinski, Oliver & Kohlschreiber, Marie & Kuchinke, Björn & Pannicke, Julia, 2019. "Does music quality matter for audience voters in a music contest?," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 122, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    7. Blagus, Neli & Šubelj, Lovro & Bajec, Marko, 2012. "Self-similar scaling of density in complex real-world networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(8), pages 2794-2802.
    8. Aloys Prinz, 2017. "Rankings as coordination games: the Dutch Top 2000 pop song ranking," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(4), pages 379-401, November.
    9. Zhijun SONG & Linjun YU, 2019. "Multifractal features of spatial variation in construction land in Beijing (1985–2015)," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Felbermayr, Gabriel J. & Toubal, Farid, 2010. "Cultural proximity and trade," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 279-293, February.
    11. Yao, Jialing & Sun, Bingbin & Xi, lifeng, 2019. "Fractality of evolving self-similar networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 515(C), pages 211-216.
    12. Wijesundera, Isuri & Halgamuge, Malka N. & Nirmalathas, Ampalavanapillai & Nanayakkara, Thrishantha, 2016. "MFPT calculation for random walks in inhomogeneous networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 462(C), pages 986-1002.
    13. Lia Papadopoulos & Pablo Blinder & Henrik Ronellenfitsch & Florian Klimm & Eleni Katifori & David Kleinfeld & Danielle S Bassett, 2018. "Comparing two classes of biological distribution systems using network analysis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-31, September.
    14. Duan, Shuyu & Wen, Tao & Jiang, Wen, 2019. "A new information dimension of complex network based on Rényi entropy," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 516(C), pages 529-542.
    15. Ikeda, Nobutoshi, 2020. "Fractal networks induced by movements of random walkers on a tree graph," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 537(C).
    16. Zhou, Ming-Yang & Xiong, Wen-Man & Wu, Xiang-Yang & Zhang, Yu-Xia & Liao, Hao, 2018. "Overlapping influence inspires the selection of multiple spreaders in complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 508(C), pages 76-83.
    17. Huang, Liang & Zheng, Yu, 2023. "Asymptotic formula on APL of fractal evolving networks generated by Durer Pentagon," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    18. Sun, Bingbin & Yao, Jialing & Xi, Lifeng, 2019. "Eigentime identities of fractal sailboat networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 520(C), pages 338-349.
    19. Ortega, José Luis & Aguillo, Isidro F., 2013. "Institutional and country collaboration in an online service of scientific profiles: Google Scholar Citations," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 394-403.
    20. P. Battiston & M. Magnani & D. Paolini & L. Rossi, 2024. "Country vs. Music: Strategic Incentives for Competing Voters," Economics Department Working Papers 2024-EP02, Department of Economics, Parma University (Italy).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jas:jasssj:2017-70-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Francesco Renzini (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.