IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jas/jasssj/2017-45-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Population Synthesis with Quasirandom Integer Sampling

Author

Abstract

Established methods for synthesising a population from geographically aggregated data are robust and well understood. However, most rely on the potentially detrimental process of integerisation if a whole individual population is required, e.g. for use in agent-based modelling (ABM). This paper describes and investigates the use of quasirandom sequences to sample populations from known marginal constraints whilst preserving those marginal distributions. We call this technique Quasirandom Integer Without-replacement Sampling (QIWS) and show that the statistical properties of quasirandomly sampled populations to be superior to those of pseudorandomly sampled ones in that they tend to yield entropies much closer to populations generated using the entropy-maximising iterative proportional fitting (IPF) algorithm. The implementation is extremely efficient, easily outperforming common IPF implementations. It is freely available as an open source R package called humanleague. Finally, we suggest how the current limitations of the implementation can be overcome, providing a direction for future work.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Smith & Robin Lovelace & Mark Birkin, 2017. "Population Synthesis with Quasirandom Integer Sampling," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 20(4), pages 1-14.
    • Handle: RePEc:jas:jasssj:2017-45-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jasss.org/20/4/14/14.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gargiulo, Floriana & Lenormand, Maxime & Huet, Sylvie & Baqueiro Espinosa, Omar, 2012. "Commuting network models: Getting the essentials," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 15(2).
    2. Lenormand, Maxime & Bassolas, Aleix & Ramasco, José J., 2016. "Systematic comparison of trip distribution laws and models," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 158-169.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bhagya N. Wickramasinghe, 2019. "Application Independent Heuristic Data Merging Methodology for Sample-Free Agent Population Synthesis," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 22(1), pages 1-5.
    2. Danilo Liuzzi & Aymeric Vié, 2022. "Staring at the Abyss: a neurocognitive grounded agent-based model of collective-risk social dilemma under the threat of environmental disaster," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 17(2), pages 613-637, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Constanza Fosco, 2012. "Spatial Difusion and Commuting Flows," Documentos de Trabajo en Economia y Ciencia Regional 30, Universidad Catolica del Norte, Chile, Department of Economics, revised Sep 2012.
    2. Thompson, C.A. & Saxberg, K. & Lega, J. & Tong, D. & Brown, H.E., 2019. "A cumulative gravity model for inter-urban spatial interaction at different scales," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Koji Murayama & Jun Nagayasu & Lamia Bazzaoui, 2022. "Spatial Dependence, Social Networks, and Economic Structures in Japanese Regional Labor Migration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-31, February.
    4. Javier Rubio-Herrero & Jesús Muñuzuri, 2021. "Indirect estimation of interregional freight flows with a real-valued genetic algorithm," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 257-282, February.
    5. Yang, Yitao & Jia, Bin & Yan, Xiao-Yong & Chen, Yan & Song, Dongdong & Zhi, Danyue & Wang, Yiyun & Gao, Ziyou, 2023. "Estimating intercity heavy truck mobility flows using the deep gravity framework," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    6. Mengyao Ren & Yaoyu Lin & Meihan Jin & Zhongyuan Duan & Yongxi Gong & Yu Liu, 2020. "Examining the effect of land-use function complementarity on intra-urban spatial interactions using metro smart card records," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1607-1629, August.
    7. Roger Bär & Albrecht Ehrensperger, 2018. "Accounting for the Boundary Problem at Subnational Level: The Supply–Demand Balance of Biomass Cooking Fuels in Kitui County, Kenya," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-32, February.
    8. Rongrong Hong & Wenming Rao & Dong Zhou & Chengchuan An & Zhenbo Lu & Jingxin Xia, 2020. "Commuting Pattern Recognition Using a Systematic Cluster Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Johari, F. & Peronato, G. & Sadeghian, P. & Zhao, X. & Widén, J., 2020. "Urban building energy modeling: State of the art and future prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    10. Javier Rubio-Herrero & Jesús Muñuzuri, 2023. "Sparse regression for data-driven deterrence functions in gravity models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 323(1), pages 153-174, April.
    11. Lenormand, Maxime & Huet, Sylvie & Gargiulo, Floriana, 2014. "Generating French virtual commuting networks at the municipality level," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 7(1), pages 43-55.
    12. Filippo Simini & Gianni Barlacchi & Massimilano Luca & Luca Pappalardo, 2021. "A Deep Gravity model for mobility flows generation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Ali R Samani & Sabyasachee Mishra & David J-H Lee & Mihalis M Golias & Jerry Everett, 2022. "A new approach to develop large-scale land-use models using publicly available data," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(1), pages 169-187, January.
    14. Inho Hong & Woo-Sung Jung & Hang-Hyun Jo, 2019. "Gravity model explained by the radiation model on a population landscape," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, June.
    15. Zhang, Bowen & Rees, Griffith & Solomon, Guy & Wilson, Alan, 2023. "Input-output analytics for urban systems: explorations in policy and planning," SocArXiv sruq7, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jas:jasssj:2017-45-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Francesco Renzini (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.