IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jae/japmet/v9y1994i4p369-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rank-Ordered Logit Models: An Empirical Analysis of Ontario Voter Preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Koop, G
  • Poirier, D J

Abstract

This study provides a Bayesian investigation of rank-ordered multinomial logit models employing conjugate priors for standard multinomial logit models as well as other priors. Also considered is a specification test of the independence of irrelevant alternatives assumption. The proposed techniques are demonstrated in an empirical investigation of Ontario voter preferences before the 1988 Canadian Federal Election. Copyright 1994 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Koop, G & Poirier, D J, 1994. "Rank-Ordered Logit Models: An Empirical Analysis of Ontario Voter Preferences," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(4), pages 369-388, Oct.-Dec..
    • Handle: RePEc:jae:japmet:v:9:y:1994:i:4:p:369-88
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0883-7252%28199410%2F199412%299%3A4%3C369%3ARLMAEA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-V&origin=bc
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mulatu Debalke, Negash, 2011. "Determinants of farmers’ preference for adaptation strategies to climate change: evidence from north shoa zone of Amhara region Ethiopia," MPRA Paper 48753, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Poirier, Dale J., 1997. "Comparing and choosing between two models with a third model in the background," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 139-151, June.
    3. Lei Zhang & David Levinson, 2006. "Determinants of Route Choice and the Value of Traveler Information," Working Papers 200808, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    4. McCabe, Christopher & Brazier, John & Gilks, Peter & Tsuchiya, Aki & Roberts, Jennifer & O'Hagan, Anthony & Stevens, Katherine, 2006. "Using rank data to estimate health state utility models," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 418-431, May.
    5. Alain Carpentier & Karine Latouche & Pierre Rainelli & . Association of Environmental And Resource Economists, 2002. "Food safety in the demand for meat quality : the case of pork chops in France," Post-Print hal-01937048, HAL.
    6. Dennis Fok & Richard Paap & Bram Van Dijk, 2012. "A Rank‐Ordered Logit Model With Unobserved Heterogeneity In Ranking Capabilities," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(5), pages 831-846, August.
    7. Paudel, Krishna P. & Poudel, Biswo N. & Dunn, Michael A. & Pandit, Mahesh, 2009. "An Analysis of Rank Ordered Data," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49518, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Poirier, Dale J., 1996. "A Bayesian analysis of nested logit models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 163-181, November.
    9. Hassid, Joseph & Maniatis, George & POLEMIS, Michael, 2024. "Do Law Professionals Lack Economic Knowledge? Field Evidence from Greece," MPRA Paper 122550, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. McCabe, C & Brazier, J & Gilks, P & Tsuchiya, A & Roberts, J & O'Hagan, A & Stevens, K, 2004. "Estimating population cardinal health state valuation models from individual ordinal (rank) health state preference data," MPRA Paper 29759, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Philip Yu, 2000. "Bayesian analysis of order-statistics models for ranking data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 65(3), pages 281-299, September.
    12. Can Cui & Susheela P. Singh & Ana‐Maria Staicu & Brian J. Reich, 2021. "Bayesian variable selection for high‐dimensional rank data," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(7), November.
    13. Marco A. Palma, 2017. "Improving the prediction of ranking data," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 1681-1710, December.

    More about this item

    Lists

    This item is featured on the following reading lists, Wikipedia, or ReplicationWiki pages:
    1. Rank-ordered logit models: An empirical analysis of Ontario voter preferences (Journal of Applied Econometrics 1994) in ReplicationWiki

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jae:japmet:v:9:y:1994:i:4:p:369-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0883-7252/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.