IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/isa/journl/v11y2009i2-3p101-131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spazio rurale e Land use quality: una proposta per un sistema di indicatori a scala comunale in Italia

Author

Listed:
  • Luca Salvati

    (Italian National Institute of Statistics)

  • Marco Zitti

    (Cra-Cma)

  • Luigi Perini

    (Cra-Cma)

Abstract

Land degradation is a global problem which involves different climatic, soil, vegetation, agricultural and population conditions. Originally attributed to the most arid regions of the world, desertification risk has been rapidly increased also in temperate regions. In Mediterranean Europe, high human pressure, climatic changes, and the intense agricultural development combine to produce land consumption, a key factors to start desertification processes. Unfortunately, the effect of agriculture on land degradation was poorly considered as far as the agro-environmental indicators are concerned. The aim of this paper is to design a system of environmental indicators contributing to improve a simplified model of land use quality assessment especially focusing on landscape, farm management, and the impact of the agricultural practices on soil quality. Thirty-two indicators were included in a Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) scheme in order to define the contribution of the agriculture to land use quality in Latium, central Italy. Finally, we discussed on the use of agro-environmental indicators as a tool to quantify the agricultural impact on the environment as an original contribution to the study of land degradation.

Suggested Citation

  • Luca Salvati & Marco Zitti & Luigi Perini, 2009. "Spazio rurale e Land use quality: una proposta per un sistema di indicatori a scala comunale in Italia," Rivista di statistica ufficiale, ISTAT - Italian National Institute of Statistics - (Rome, ITALY), vol. 11(2-3), pages 101-131, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:isa:journl:v:11:y:2009:i:2-3:p:101-131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.istat.it/it/files/2011/05/2-3_20091.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lillard, Lee & Smith, James P & Welch, Finis, 1986. "What Do We Really Know about Wages? The Importance of Nonreporting and Census Imputation," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 94(3), pages 489-506, June.
    2. Little, Roderick J A, 1985. "A Note about Models for Selectivity Bias," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 53(6), pages 1469-1474, November.
    3. Schenker, Nathaniel & Raghunathan, Trivellore E. & Chiu, Pei-Lu & Makuc, Diane M. & Zhang, Guangyu & Cohen, Alan J., 2006. "Multiple Imputation of Missing Income Data in the National Health Interview Survey," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 924-933, September.
    4. He, Yulei & Raghunathan, Trivellore E., 2006. "Tukey's gh Distribution for Multiple Imputation," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 60, pages 251-256, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roberto Gismondi, 2009. "Optimal Provisional Estimation in Short-term Surveys," Rivista di statistica ufficiale, ISTAT - Italian National Institute of Statistics - (Rome, ITALY), vol. 11(2-3), pages 5-34, January.
    2. Luigi Costanzo & Filippo Oropallo & Stefania Rossetti, 2009. "Le dinamiche produttive d’impresa nei sistemi locali del lavoro," Rivista di statistica ufficiale, ISTAT - Italian National Institute of Statistics - (Rome, ITALY), vol. 11(2-3), pages 81-100, January.
    3. Federica Battellini & Alessandra Coli & Francesca Tartamella, 2009. "La SAM come strumento di integrazione e analisi," Rivista di statistica ufficiale, ISTAT - Italian National Institute of Statistics - (Rome, ITALY), vol. 11(2-3), pages 35-62, January.
    4. Caterina Giusti, 2009. "Multiple Imputation of Missing Income Data in the Survey on Income and Living Conditions," Rivista di statistica ufficiale, ISTAT - Italian National Institute of Statistics - (Rome, ITALY), vol. 11(2-3), pages 63-80, January.
    5. repec:diw:diwwpp:dp53 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Alfonso Miranda & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh & John W. McDonald, 2012. "Reducing bias due to missing values of the response variable by joint modeling with an auxiliary variable," DoQSS Working Papers 12-05, Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London.
    7. Yongwei Chen & Dahai Fu, 2015. "Measuring income inequality using survey data: the case of China," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 13(2), pages 299-307, June.
    8. Gopalakrishnan, Raja & Guevara, C. Angelo & Ben-Akiva, Moshe, 2020. "Combining multiple imputation and control function methods to deal with missing data and endogeneity in discrete-choice models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 45-57.
    9. Verbeek, M.J.C.M. & Nijman, T.E., 1992. "Incomplete panels and selection bias : A survey," Discussion Paper 1992-7, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    10. Riphahn, Regina, 1999. "Immigrant Participation in Social Assistance Programs: Evidence from German Guestworkers," CEPR Discussion Papers 2318, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    11. Anton Korinek & Johan Mistiaen & Martin Ravallion, 2006. "Survey nonresponse and the distribution of income," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 4(1), pages 33-55, April.
    12. Hai Zhong, 2010. "The impact of missing data in the estimation of concentration index: a potential source of bias," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 11(3), pages 255-266, June.
    13. Vladimir Hlasny & Paolo Verme, 2022. "The Impact of Top Incomes Biases on the Measurement of Inequality in the United States," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 84(4), pages 749-788, August.
    14. Guilhem Bascle, 2008. "Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research," Post-Print hal-00576795, HAL.
    15. Meyer, Bruce D. & Mittag, Nikolas, 2019. "Combining Administrative and Survey Data to Improve Income Measurement," IZA Discussion Papers 12266, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Bruce D. Meyer & Derek Wu & Victoria R. Mooers & Carla Medalia, 2019. "The use and misuse of income data and extreme poverty in the United States," AEI Economics Working Papers 1018925, American Enterprise Institute.
    17. Korinek, Anton & Mistiaen, Johan A. & Ravallion, Martin, 2007. "An econometric method of correcting for unit nonresponse bias in surveys," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 213-235, January.
    18. McGovern, Mark E. & Canning, David & Bärnighausen, Till, 2018. "Accounting for non-response bias using participation incentives and survey design: An application using gift vouchers," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 239-244.
    19. Christian Dustmann & Francesca Fabbri, 2005. "Gender and Ethnicity--Married Immigrants in Britain," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 21(3), pages 462-484, Autumn.
    20. Winters, John V. & Hirsch, Barry, 2012. "An Anatomy of Racial and Ethnic Trends in Male Earnings," IZA Discussion Papers 6766, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    21. Christopher R. Bollinger & Barry T. Hirsch, 2010. "GDP & Beyond – die europäische Perspektive," RatSWD Working Papers 165, German Data Forum (RatSWD).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isa:journl:v:11:y:2009:i:2-3:p:101-131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rossetti (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/istgvit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.