IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ipf/psejou/v48y2024i4p399-419.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Traditional or social media: which capture employment better?

Author

Listed:
  • Marija Hruska

    (University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics and Business, Department of Statistics, Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Mirjana Cizmesija

    (University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics and Business, Department of Statistics, Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

Political discourse has the ability to spread either uncertainty or calm among the population. Economic upheavals of considerable magnitude can also spread ambiguity. Both newspaper articles and Twitter posts reflect important events that have the potential to increase or decrease uncertainty from a citizen’s perspective. We employ two measures of media uncertainty, one reflecting the uncertainty perceived by journalists and the other characterizing the uncertainty associated with Twitter users. More specifically, we use the Twitter Economic Uncertainty and the Economic Policy Uncertainty Index. To investigate which uncertainty source better captures employment variations, we apply a regression decision tree and linear regression. Our results speak in favour of the more traditional media uncertainty source. Linear regression outperforms the decision tree in both models. Namely, we find a statistically significant negative relationship between both uncertainty measures and employment, while controlling for other macroeconomic aspects.

Suggested Citation

  • Marija Hruska & Mirjana Cizmesija, 2024. "Traditional or social media: which capture employment better?," Public Sector Economics, Institute of Public Finance, vol. 48(4), pages 399-419.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipf:psejou:v:48:y:2024:i:4:p:399-419
    DOI: 10.3326/pse.48.4.2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pse-journal.hr/upload/files/pse/2024/4/Traditional_or_social_media___which_capture_employment_better.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3326/pse.48.4.2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economic policy uncertainty; employment; machine learning; decision tree; Twitter economic uncertainty;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E69 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - Other
    • C19 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Other
    • C49 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Other
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipf:psejou:v:48:y:2024:i:4:p:399-419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Martina Fabris (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ijfffhr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.