IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ortrsc/v48y2014i2p225-242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Price of Strict and Light Robustness in Timetable Information

Author

Listed:
  • Marc Goerigk

    (Institut für Numerische und Angewandte Mathematik, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, D-37083 Göttingen, Germany)

  • Marie Schmidt

    (Institut für Numerische und Angewandte Mathematik, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, D-37083 Göttingen, Germany)

  • Anita Schöbel

    (Institut für Numerische und Angewandte Mathematik, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, D-37083 Göttingen, Germany)

  • Martin Knoth

    (Institut für Informatik, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, D-06120 Halle, Germany)

  • Matthias Müller-Hannemann

    (Institut für Informatik, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, D-06120 Halle, Germany)

Abstract

In timetable information in public transport the goal is to search for a good path between an origin and a destination. Usually, the travel time and the number of transfers will be minimized. In this paper, we consider robust timetable information; i.e., we want to identify a path that will bring the passenger to the planned destination even in the case of delays. The classic notion of strict robustness leads to the problem of identifying those transfer activities that will never break in any of the expected delay scenarios. We show that this is, in general, a strongly NP-hard problem. Therefore, we propose a conservative heuristic which identifies a large subset of these strictly robust transfer activities in polynomial time by dynamic programming and so allows us to efficiently find strictly robust paths. We also transfer the notion of light robustness, originally introduced for timetabling, to timetable information. In computational experiments we then study the price of strict and light robustness: how much longer is the travel time of a robust path than of a shortest one, according to the published schedule? Based on the 2011 train schedule within Germany, we quantitatively explore the trade-off between the level of guaranteed robustness and the increase in travel time. Strict robustness turns out to be too conservative, whereas light robustness is promising: a modest level of guarantees is achievable at a reasonable price for the majority of passengers.

Suggested Citation

  • Marc Goerigk & Marie Schmidt & Anita Schöbel & Martin Knoth & Matthias Müller-Hannemann, 2014. "The Price of Strict and Light Robustness in Timetable Information," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(2), pages 225-242, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:48:y:2014:i:2:p:225-242
    DOI: 10.1287/trsc.2013.0470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2013.0470
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/trsc.2013.0470?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dimitris Bertsimas & Melvyn Sim, 2004. "The Price of Robustness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 35-53, February.
    2. A. L. Soyster, 1973. "Technical Note—Convex Programming with Set-Inclusive Constraints and Applications to Inexact Linear Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(5), pages 1154-1157, October.
    3. Zielinski, Pawel, 2004. "The computational complexity of the relative robust shortest path problem with interval data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(3), pages 570-576, November.
    4. A. Ben-Tal & A. Nemirovski, 1998. "Robust Convex Optimization," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 769-805, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alberto Pajares & Xavier Blasco & Juan Manuel Herrero & Javier Sanchis & Raúl Simarro, 2024. "Designing Decentralized Multi-Variable Robust Controllers: A Multi-Objective Approach Considering Nearly Optimal Solutions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-21, July.
    2. PeCoy, Michael D. & Redmond, Michael A., 2023. "Flight reliability during periods of high uncertainty," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    3. Schön, Cornelia & König, Eva, 2018. "A stochastic dynamic programming approach for delay management of a single train line," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 501-518.
    4. Schöbel, Anita & Zhou-Kangas, Yue, 2021. "The price of multiobjective robustness: Analyzing solution sets to uncertain multiobjective problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 782-793.
    5. Pornpimon Boriwan & Matthias Ehrgott & Daishi Kuroiwa & Narin Petrot, 2020. "The Lexicographic Tolerable Robustness Concept for Uncertain Multi-Objective Optimization Problems: A Study on Water Resources Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Anita Schöbel, 2014. "Generalized light robustness and the trade-off between robustness and nominal quality," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 80(2), pages 161-191, October.
    7. Mohammad Hossein Keyhani & Mathias Schnee & Karsten Weihe, 2017. "Arrive in Time by Train with High Probability," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 1122-1137, November.
    8. Eva König, 2020. "A review on railway delay management," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 335-361, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Xingchen & Xu, Guangcheng & Wu, Jie & Xu, Chengzhen & Zhu, Qingyuan, 2024. "Evaluation of bank efficiency by considering the uncertainty of nonperforming loans," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    2. Wenqing Chen & Melvyn Sim & Jie Sun & Chung-Piaw Teo, 2010. "From CVaR to Uncertainty Set: Implications in Joint Chance-Constrained Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 470-485, April.
    3. Zhi Chen & Melvyn Sim & Huan Xu, 2019. "Distributionally Robust Optimization with Infinitely Constrained Ambiguity Sets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1328-1344, September.
    4. Stefan Mišković, 2017. "A VNS-LP algorithm for the robust dynamic maximal covering location problem," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(4), pages 1011-1033, October.
    5. M. J. Naderi & M. S. Pishvaee, 2017. "Robust bi-objective macroscopic municipal water supply network redesign and rehabilitation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(9), pages 2689-2711, July.
    6. Xuejie Bai & Yankui Liu, 2016. "Robust optimization of supply chain network design in fuzzy decision system," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 1131-1149, December.
    7. Beck, Yasmine & Ljubić, Ivana & Schmidt, Martin, 2023. "A survey on bilevel optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 401-426.
    8. Antonio G. Martín & Manuel Díaz-Madroñero & Josefa Mula, 2020. "Master production schedule using robust optimization approaches in an automobile second-tier supplier," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(1), pages 143-166, March.
    9. Hanks, Robert W. & Weir, Jeffery D. & Lunday, Brian J., 2017. "Robust goal programming using different robustness echelons via norm-based and ellipsoidal uncertainty sets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 636-646.
    10. Roberto Gomes de Mattos & Fabricio Oliveira & Adriana Leiras & Abdon Baptista de Paula Filho & Paulo Gonçalves, 2019. "Robust optimization of the insecticide-treated bed nets procurement and distribution planning under uncertainty for malaria prevention and control," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1045-1078, December.
    11. Guanglei Wang & Hassan Hijazi, 2018. "Mathematical programming methods for microgrid design and operations: a survey on deterministic and stochastic approaches," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 553-608, November.
    12. F. Davarian & J. Behnamian, 2022. "Robust finite-horizon scheduling/rescheduling of operating rooms with elective and emergency surgeries under resource constraints," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 625-641, December.
    13. Wang, Tian & Deng, Shiming, 2019. "Multi-Period energy procurement policies for smart-grid communities with deferrable demand and supplementary uncertain power supplies," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 212-226.
    14. Alberto Caprara & Laura Galli & Sebastian Stiller & Paolo Toth, 2014. "Delay-Robust Event Scheduling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 274-283, April.
    15. Steffen Rebennack, 2022. "Data-driven stochastic optimization for distributional ambiguity with integrated confidence region," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 84(2), pages 255-293, October.
    16. Oğuz Solyalı & Jean-François Cordeau & Gilbert Laporte, 2016. "The Impact of Modeling on Robust Inventory Management Under Demand Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(4), pages 1188-1201, April.
    17. Wang, Fan & Zhang, Chao & Zhang, Hui & Xu, Liang, 2021. "Short-term physician rescheduling model with feature-driven demand for mental disorders outpatients," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    18. Zhi Chen & Melvyn Sim & Peng Xiong, 2020. "Robust Stochastic Optimization Made Easy with RSOME," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(8), pages 3329-3339, August.
    19. Donya Rahmani & Arash Zandi & Sara Behdad & Arezou Entezaminia, 2021. "A light robust model for aggregate production planning with consideration of environmental impacts of machines," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 273-297, March.
    20. Paul, Jomon A. & Zhang, Minjiao, 2019. "Supply location and transportation planning for hurricanes: A two-stage stochastic programming framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 108-125.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:48:y:2014:i:2:p:225-242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.