IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v69y2021i2p486-508.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multilevel Approaches for the Critical Node Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Baggio

    (Quant Research, swissQuant Group AG, CH-8001 Zurich, Switzerland;)

  • Margarida Carvalho

    (CIRRELT and DIRO, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3T 1J4, Canada;)

  • Andrea Lodi

    (École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montreal, Québec H3T 1J4, Canada;)

  • Andrea Tramontani

    (CPLEX Optimization, IBM, 40132 Bologna, Italy)

Abstract

In recent years, a lot of effort has been dedicated to develop strategies to defend networks against possible cascade failures or malicious viral attacks. On the one hand, network safety is investigated from a preventive perspective. On the other hand, blocking models have been proposed for scenarios in which the attack has already taken place causing a harmful spreading throughout the network. In this work, we combine these two perspectives. More precisely, following the framework defender–attacker–defender, we consider a model of prevention, attack, and damage containment using a three-stage, zero-sum game. The defender is not only able to adopt preventive strategies, but also to defend the network after an attack takes place. Assuming that the attacker acts optimally, we compute a defensive strategy for the first stage that minimizes the total damage to the network in the end of the third stage. Our contribution consists of considering this problem as a trilevel mixed-integer program and designing an exact algorithm for it based on tools developed for multilevel programming.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Baggio & Margarida Carvalho & Andrea Lodi & Andrea Tramontani, 2021. "Multilevel Approaches for the Critical Node Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 486-508, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:69:y:2021:i:2:p:486-508
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2020.2014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2020.2014
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2020.2014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matteo Fischetti & Ivana Ljubić & Michele Monaci & Markus Sinnl, 2017. "A New General-Purpose Algorithm for Mixed-Integer Bilevel Linear Programs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1615-1637, December.
    2. Paola Cappanera & Maria Paola Scaparra, 2011. "Optimal Allocation of Protective Resources in Shortest-Path Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(1), pages 64-80, February.
    3. P. M. Ghare & D. C. Montgomery & W. C. Turner, 1971. "Optimal interdiction policy for a flow network," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 37-45, March.
    4. H. Donald Ratliff & G. Thomas Sicilia & S. H. Lubore, 1975. "Finding the n Most Vital Links in Flow Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(5), pages 531-539, January.
    5. Leonardo Lozano & J. Cole Smith, 2017. "A Backward Sampling Framework for Interdiction Problems with Fortification," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 123-139, February.
    6. Mehdi Hemmati & J. Cole Smith & My Thai, 2014. "A cutting-plane algorithm for solving a weighted influence interdiction problem," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 71-104, January.
    7. Alberto Caprara & Margarida Carvalho & Andrea Lodi & Gerhard J. Woeginger, 2016. "Bilevel Knapsack with Interdiction Constraints," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 319-333, May.
    8. Matteo Fischetti & Ivana Ljubić & Michele Monaci & Markus Sinnl, 2019. "Interdiction Games and Monotonicity, with Application to Knapsack Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 390-410, April.
    9. Gerald Brown & Matthew Carlyle & Javier Salmerón & Kevin Wood, 2006. "Defending Critical Infrastructure," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 530-544, December.
    10. James T. Moore & Jonathan F. Bard, 1990. "The Mixed Integer Linear Bilevel Programming Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(5), pages 911-921, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fu, Chenyi & Ma, Shoufeng & Zhu, Ning & He, Qiao-Chu & Yang, Hai, 2022. "Bike-sharing inventory management for market expansion," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 28-54.
    2. Zhou, Yangming & Wang, Gezi & Hao, Jin-Kao & Geng, Na & Jiang, Zhibin, 2023. "A fast tri-individual memetic search approach for the distance-based critical node problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(2), pages 540-554.
    3. Leitner, Markus & Ljubić, Ivana & Monaci, Michele & Sinnl, Markus & Tanınmış, Kübra, 2023. "An exact method for binary fortification games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 1026-1039.
    4. Nicolas Fröhlich & Stefan Ruzika, 2022. "Interdicting facilities in tree networks," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(1), pages 95-118, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claudio Contardo & Jorge A. Sefair, 2022. "A Progressive Approximation Approach for the Exact Solution of Sparse Large-Scale Binary Interdiction Games," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 890-908, March.
    2. Leitner, Markus & Ljubić, Ivana & Monaci, Michele & Sinnl, Markus & Tanınmış, Kübra, 2023. "An exact method for binary fortification games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 1026-1039.
    3. Smith, J. Cole & Song, Yongjia, 2020. "A survey of network interdiction models and algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 797-811.
    4. Tanınmış, Kübra & Aras, Necati & Altınel, İ. Kuban, 2022. "Improved x-space algorithm for min-max bilevel problems with an application to misinformation spread in social networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 40-52.
    5. Fischetti, Matteo & Monaci, Michele & Sinnl, Markus, 2018. "A dynamic reformulation heuristic for Generalized Interdiction Problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(1), pages 40-51.
    6. Furini, Fabio & Ljubić, Ivana & Martin, Sébastien & San Segundo, Pablo, 2019. "The maximum clique interdiction problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(1), pages 112-127.
    7. Kübra Tanınmış & Markus Sinnl, 2022. "A Branch-and-Cut Algorithm for Submodular Interdiction Games," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2634-2657, September.
    8. Thomas Kleinert & Martin Schmidt, 2021. "Computing Feasible Points of Bilevel Problems with a Penalty Alternating Direction Method," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 198-215, January.
    9. Beck, Yasmine & Ljubić, Ivana & Schmidt, Martin, 2023. "A survey on bilevel optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 401-426.
    10. Matteo Fischetti & Ivana Ljubić & Michele Monaci & Markus Sinnl, 2019. "Interdiction Games and Monotonicity, with Application to Knapsack Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 390-410, April.
    11. Liu, Shaonan & Kong, Nan & Parikh, Pratik & Wang, Mingzheng, 2023. "Optimal trauma care network redesign with government subsidy: A bilevel integer programming approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    12. Losada, Chaya & Scaparra, M. Paola & O’Hanley, Jesse R., 2012. "Optimizing system resilience: A facility protection model with recovery time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(3), pages 519-530.
    13. Chaya Losada & M. Scaparra & Richard Church & Mark Daskin, 2012. "The stochastic interdiction median problem with disruption intensity levels," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 201(1), pages 345-365, December.
    14. David L. Alderson & Gerald G. Brown & W. Matthew Carlyle & R. Kevin Wood, 2018. "Assessing and Improving the Operational Resilience of a Large Highway Infrastructure System to Worst-Case Losses," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 1012-1034, August.
    15. Leonardo Lozano & J. Cole Smith, 2017. "A Backward Sampling Framework for Interdiction Problems with Fortification," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 123-139, February.
    16. Yan, Xihong & Ren, Xiaorong & Nie, Xiaofeng, 2022. "A budget allocation model for domestic airport network protection," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    17. Kosmas, Daniel & Sharkey, Thomas C. & Mitchell, John E. & Maass, Kayse Lee & Martin, Lauren, 2023. "Interdicting restructuring networks with applications in illicit trafficking," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(2), pages 832-851.
    18. Xiang, Yin, 2023. "Minimizing the maximal reliable path with a nodal interdiction model considering resource sharing," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    19. Juan S. Borrero & Leonardo Lozano, 2021. "Modeling Defender-Attacker Problems as Robust Linear Programs with Mixed-Integer Uncertainty Sets," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1570-1589, October.
    20. Parajuli, Anubhuti & Kuzgunkaya, Onur & Vidyarthi, Navneet, 2017. "Responsive contingency planning of capacitated supply networks under disruption risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 13-37.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:69:y:2021:i:2:p:486-508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.