IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v50y2004i2p253-267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ordering and Inventory Policies for Step Changes in the Unit Item Cost: A Discounted Cash Flow Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Robert W. Grubbström

    (Department of Production Economics, Linköping Institute of Technology, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden)

  • Brian G. Kingsman

    (Formerly of the Department of Management Science, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YL, United Kingdom)

Abstract

This paper considers the problem of determining the optimal ordering quantities of a purchased item where there are step changes in price, either up or down. Other costs incurred include ordering costs associated with each replenishment and holding costs related to capital tied up in inventory and physical stock holding. The net present value (NPV) principle is applied. Explicit expressions for the development of the optimal order quantities over time are presented. It is shown that three cases may be distinguished: (i) when the price change is very small, (ii) when an essential price increase occurs, and (iii) when there is an essential price decrease. Although the optimal last-order quantity before a price increase is similar in magnitude to what has been presented in other articles applying average cost approaches, in certain respects, this paper offers novel results contradictory to those suggested by other authors. Analysis shows that the average-cost model solutions are first-order approximations in the discount rate. Numerical evaluations of a range of price increases and times to the price increase suggest that, with certain important caveats, the average-cost formulae are likely to be acceptable for most practical situations for the infinite horizon situation.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert W. Grubbström & Brian G. Kingsman, 2004. "Ordering and Inventory Policies for Step Changes in the Unit Item Cost: A Discounted Cash Flow Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 253-267, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:50:y:2004:i:2:p:253-267
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0150
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0150?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benjamin Lev & Howard J. Weiss, 1990. "Inventory Models with Cost Changes," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 53-63, February.
    2. Kingsman, Brian G. & Boussofiane, Aziz, 1989. "Ordering and stockholding under price inflation when prices increase in successive discrete jumps," Engineering Costs and Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1-4), pages 395-407, August.
    3. G. Hadley, 1964. "A Comparison of Order Quantities Computed Using the Average Annual Cost and the Discounted Cost," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 472-476, April.
    4. Steven A. Lippman, 1971. "Economic Order Quantities and Multiple Set-Up Costs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 39-47, September.
    5. Martin, G. E., 1994. "Note on an EOQ model with a temporary sale price," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2-3), pages 241-243, December.
    6. Sam G. Taylor & Charles E. Bradley, 1985. "Optimal Ordering Strategies for Announced Price Increases," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 312-325, April.
    7. Markowski, Edward P., 1990. "Criteria for evaluating purchase quantity decisions in response to future price increases," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 364-370, August.
    8. Grubbstrom, Robert W. & Thorstenson, Anders, 1986. "Evaluation of capital costs in a multi-level inventory system by means of the annuity stream principle," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 136-145, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Grubbström, Robert W., 2021. "Production decisions based on absolute vs. relative risk aversion and their extensions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    2. Shaposhnik, Yaron & Herer, Yale T. & Naseraldin, Hussein, 2015. "Optimal ordering for a probabilistic one-time discount," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 803-814.
    3. Ramasesh, Ranga V. & Rachamadugu, Ram, 2012. "Evaluating lot-sizing strategies under limited-time price incentives: An efficient lower bound," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 177-182.
    4. Andriolo, Alessandro & Battini, Daria & Grubbström, Robert W. & Persona, Alessandro & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2014. "A century of evolution from Harris׳s basic lot size model: Survey and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 16-38.
    5. Arnold, Jan & Minner, Stefan & Eidam, Björn, 2009. "Raw material procurement with fluctuating prices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 353-364, October.
    6. Grubbström, Robert W., 2010. "The Newsboy problem when customer demand is a compound renewal process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(1), pages 134-142, May.
    7. Grubbström, Robert W., 2019. "The dependence of the incremental risk rate of interest on absolute risk aversion - Applying the Laplace transform to risk preference evaluation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 51-59.
    8. Grubbström, Robert W., 2014. "Dynamic lotsizing with a finite production rate," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 68-79.
    9. Ramasesh, Ranga V., 2010. "Lot-sizing decisions under limited-time price incentives: A review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 118-135, June.
    10. Suresh Chand & Sunantha Teyarachakul Prime & Suresh Sethi, 2018. "Production planning with multiple production lines: Forward algorithm and insights on process design for volume flexibility," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(6-7), pages 535-549, September.
    11. Beullens, Patrick & Janssens, Gerrit K., 2011. "Holding costs under push or pull conditions - The impact of the Anchor Point," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(1), pages 115-125, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramasesh, Ranga V., 2010. "Lot-sizing decisions under limited-time price incentives: A review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 118-135, June.
    2. Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Pentico, David W., 2013. "An economic order quantity model with a known price increase and partial backordering," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(3), pages 516-525.
    3. Tersine, Richard J., 1996. "Economic replenishment strategies for announced price increases," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 266-280, July.
    4. Khouja, Moutaz & Park, Sungjune, 2003. "Optimal lot sizing under continuous price decrease," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 539-545, December.
    5. Joglekar, Prafulla & Lee, Patrick, 1998. "Comments on: A comparative analysis for determining optimal price and order quantity when a sale increases demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 228-241, August.
    6. Ardalan, Alireza, 1995. "A comparative analysis of approaches for determining optimal price and order quantity when a sale increases demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 416-430, July.
    7. Corbacioglu, Umut & van der Laan, Erwin A., 2007. "Setting the holding cost rates in a two-product system with remanufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(1-2), pages 185-194, September.
    8. Luciano, Elisa & Peccati, Lorenzo, 1999. "Some basic problems in inventory theory: The financial perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 294-303, April.
    9. van der Laan, Erwin, 2003. "An NPV and AC analysis of a stochastic inventory system with joint manufacturing and remanufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 317-331, January.
    10. Wei Huang & Vidyadhar G. Kulkarni & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2003. "Optimal EOQ for Announced Price Increases in Infinite Horizon," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(2), pages 336-339, April.
    11. Pinçe, Çerağ, 2021. "Forward Buying and Strategic Stockouts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(1), pages 118-131.
    12. Ben A. Chaouch, 2007. "Inventory control and periodic price discounting campaigns," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(1), pages 94-108, February.
    13. Gurnani, Haresh, 1996. "Optimal ordering policies in inventory systems with random demand and random deal offerings," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 299-312, December.
    14. Beullens, Patrick, 2014. "Revisiting foundations in lot sizing—Connections between Harris, Crowther, Monahan, and Clark," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 68-81.
    15. Farvid, Mojtaba & Rosling, Kaj, 2014. "The discounted (R,Q) inventory model—The Shrewd Accountant's Heuristic," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 17-27.
    16. Wang, Yunzeng, 2001. "The optimality of myopic stocking policies for systems with decreasing purchasing prices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 153-159, August.
    17. Ramasesh, Ranga V. & Rachamadugu, Ram, 2012. "Evaluating lot-sizing strategies under limited-time price incentives: An efficient lower bound," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 177-182.
    18. Ram Rachamadugu & Ranga Ramasesh, 1994. "Suboptimality of equal lot sizes for finite‐horizon problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(7), pages 1019-1027, December.
    19. Goyal, S. K., 1996. "A comment on Martin's: Note on an EOQ model with a temporary sale price," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2-3), pages 283-284, June.
    20. Yusen Xia, 2016. "Responding to supplier temporary price discounts in a supply chain through ordering and pricing decisions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(7), pages 1938-1950, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:50:y:2004:i:2:p:253-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.