IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v70y2024i10p6983-7003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Choosing to Discover the Unknown: The Effects of Choice on User Attention to Online Video Advertising

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng Luo

    (College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Zhenhui (Jack) Jiang

    (HKU Business School, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Xiuping Li

    (NUS Business School, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119245)

  • Cheng Yi

    (School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Catherine Tucker

    (Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142)

Abstract

Online video platforms face the challenge of balancing the needs of their users with those of their advertisers. Although users typically prefer to have less intrusive ads, advertisers aim to effectively catch user attention. This paper investigates how the provision of ad choice affects the effectiveness of video advertising. We argue that allowing users to choose an ad to view may trigger a “conjecture-formation-and-confirmation” process that motivates users to pay more attention to the selected ad. Two online experiments and four laboratory experiments are conducted to test the theorized underlying mechanism of the ad choice effect. Study 1 finds when users are unfamiliar (versus familiar) with the content of ad options (i.e., they need to make conjectures about ad content), ad choice is more likely to increase user attention to the chosen ad. Study 2 and Study 3 show that the impact of ad choice on user attention is more likely to be positive when users are enabled to make conjectures about ad content, such as when choice options provide more relevant information about ad content. Study 4a and Study 4b provide more direct support for the underlying mechanism by showing that the ad choice effect is attenuated when users cannot form conjectures about ad content at the choice stage. Study 5 further demonstrates that the positive effect of ad choice is robust across different ad settings. Taken together, these studies show ad choice is more likely to boost the effectiveness of video advertising when the “conjecture-formation-and-confirmation” process is triggered.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng Luo & Zhenhui (Jack) Jiang & Xiuping Li & Cheng Yi & Catherine Tucker, 2024. "Choosing to Discover the Unknown: The Effects of Choice on User Attention to Online Video Advertising," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(10), pages 6983-7003, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:10:p:6983-7003
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2019.03291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.03291
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2019.03291?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yangjie Gu & Simona Botti & David Faro, 2013. "Turning the Page: The Impact of Choice Closure on Satisfaction," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(2), pages 268-283.
    2. Anuj Kumar & Yinliang (Ricky) Tan, 2015. "The Demand Effects of Joint Product Advertising in Online Videos," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(8), pages 1921-1937, August.
    3. Simonson, Itamar & Kivetz, Ran, 2000. "The Effects of Incomplete Information on Consumer Choice," Research Papers 1609, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    4. Bellman, Steven & Beal, Virginia & Wooley, Brooke & Varan, Duane, 2020. "Viewing time as a cross-media metric: Comparing viewing time for video advertising on television and online," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 103-113.
    5. Zeelenberg, M., 1999. "Anticipated regret, expected feedback and behavioral decision-making," Other publications TiSEM 38371d1b-31fd-45b0-860f-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Yih Hwai Lee & Cheng Qiu, 2009. "When Uncertainty Brings Pleasure: The Role of Prospect Imageability and Mental Imagery," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(4), pages 624-633, December.
    7. Gu, Yangjie & Botti, Simona & Faro, David, 2018. "Seeking and Avoiding Choice Closure to Enhance Outcome Satisfaction," HEC Research Papers Series 1274, HEC Paris.
    8. Bettman, James R & Luce, Mary Frances & Payne, John W, 1998. "Constructive Consumer Choice Processes," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 25(3), pages 187-217, December.
    9. Xiaomeng Du & Meng Su & Xiaoquan (Michael) Zhang & Xiaona Zheng, 2017. "Bidding for Multiple Keywords in Sponsored Search Advertising: Keyword Categories and Match Types," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 711-722, December.
    10. Rik Pieters & Michel Wedel & Jie Zhang, 2007. "Optimal Feature Advertising Design Under Competitive Clutter," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(11), pages 1815-1828, November.
    11. Jeffrey L. Jenkins & Bonnie Brinton Anderson & Anthony Vance & C. Brock Kirwan & David Eargle, 2016. "More Harm Than Good? How Messages That Interrupt Can Make Us Vulnerable," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 880-896, December.
    12. Ariely, Dan, 2000. "Controlling the Information Flow: Effects on Consumers' Decision Making and Preferences," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 27(2), pages 233-248, September.
    13. Zhen Sun & Milind Dawande & Ganesh Janakiraman & Vijay Mookerjee, 2017. "Not Just a Fad: Optimal Sequencing in Mobile In-App Advertising," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 511-528, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karimi, Sahar & Holland, Christopher P. & Papamichail, K. Nadia, 2018. "The impact of consumer archetypes on online purchase decision-making processes and outcomes: A behavioural process perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 71-82.
    2. Mengzhou Zhuang & Eric (Er) Fang & Jongkuk Lee & Xiaoling Li, 2021. "The Effects of Price Rank on Clicks and Conversions in Product List Advertising on Online Retail Platforms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1412-1430, December.
    3. Vilma Todri & Anindya Ghose & Param Vir Singh, 2020. "Trade-Offs in Online Advertising: Advertising Effectiveness and Annoyance Dynamics Across the Purchase Funnel," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 102-125, March.
    4. Davvetas, Vasileios & Diamantopoulos, Adamantios, 2017. "“Regretting your brand-self?” The moderating role of consumer-brand identification on consumer responses to purchase regret," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 218-227.
    5. Christina Schamp & Mark Heitmann & Robin Katzenstein, 2019. "Consideration of ethical attributes along the consumer decision-making journey," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 328-348, March.
    6. Bonsall, Peter & Shires, Jeremy & Maule, John & Matthews, Bryan & Beale, Jo, 2007. "Responses to complex pricing signals: Theory, evidence and implications for road pricing," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 672-683, August.
    7. Yangjie Gu & Elaine Chan & Aradhna Krishna, 2024. "The trivial-task motivation effect: highlighting completion of an initial trivial task increases motivation for the main task," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 219-230, June.
    8. Daniela Defazio & Chiara Franzoni & Cristina Rossi-Lamastra, 2021. "How Pro-social Framing Affects the Success of Crowdfunding Projects: The Role of Emphasis and Information Crowdedness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(2), pages 357-378, June.
    9. Nath, Prithwiraj & McKechnie, Sally, 2016. "Task facilitative tools, choice goals, and risk averseness: A process-view study of e-stores," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1572-1576.
    10. Shuai Yang & Xinyu Chang & Sixing Chen & Shan Lin & William T. Ross, 2022. "Does music really work? The two-stage audiovisual cross-modal correspondence effect on consumers’ shopping behavior," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 251-276, June.
    11. Obi M. Ogbanufe & Corey Baham, 2023. "Using Multi-Factor Authentication for Online Account Security: Examining the Influence of Anticipated Regret," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 897-916, April.
    12. Michel Wedel & Rik Pieters & Ralf Lans, 2023. "Modeling Eye Movements During Decision Making: A Review," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(2), pages 697-729, June.
    13. Maurer, Steven D. & Liu, Yuping, 2007. "Developing effective e-recruiting websites: Insights for managers from marketers," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 305-314.
    14. Kurt A. Carlson & Samuel D. Bond, 2006. "Improving Preference Assessment: Limiting the Effect of Context Through Pre-exposure to Attribute Levels," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 410-421, March.
    15. Mao, Wen & Oppewal, Harmen, 2010. "Did I choose the right university? How post-purchase information affects cognitive dissonance, satisfaction and perceived service quality," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 28-35.
    16. Tianshi Li & Wenli Li & Yuqing Zhao & Jingpei Ma, 2023. "Rationality manipulation during consumer decision-making process: an analysis of Alibaba’s online shopping carnival," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 331-364, March.
    17. Punj, Girish & Moore, Robert, 2009. "Information search and consideration set formation in a web-based store environment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 644-650, June.
    18. Hyowon Kim & Dong Soo Kim & Greg M. Allenby, 2020. "Benefit Formation and Enhancement," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 419-468, December.
    19. repec:cup:judgdm:v:3:y:2008:i:6:p:449-456 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Amos Schurr & Yaakov Kareev & Judith Avrahami & Ilana Ritov, 2012. "Taking the Broad Perspective: Risky Choices in Repeated Proficiency Tasks," Discussion Paper Series dp621, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    21. Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde, 2017. "How regret moves individual and collective choices towards rationality," Chapters, in: Morris Altman (ed.), Handbook of Behavioural Economics and Smart Decision-Making, chapter 11, pages 188-204, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:10:p:6983-7003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.