IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v68y2022i4p2824-2841.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Information Asymmetry and Limited Production Capacity on Business Interruption Insurance

Author

Listed:
  • Yuan-Mao Kao

    (Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708)

  • N. Bora Keskin

    (Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708)

  • Kevin Shang

    (Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708)

Abstract

We consider a firm that faces a potential disruption in its normal operations can purchase business interruption (BI) insurance from an insurer to guard against the disruption risk. The firm makes demand forecasts and can put a recovery effort if a disruption occurs; both are unobservable to the insurer. Accordingly, the insurer offers BI insurance to the firm while facing adverse selection and moral hazard . We first find that, because of the joint effect of limited production capacity and self-impelled recovery effort, the firm with a lower demand forecast benefits more from BI insurance than that with a higher demand forecast. Anticipating a higher premium, the low-demand firm has an incentive to pretend to have the higher demand forecast to obtain more profit. We then derive the optimal insurance contracts to deal with the information asymmetry and show how the firm’s characteristics affect the optimal contracts. Both high- and low-demand contracts are affected by the firm’s operational characteristics in the same direction, and the informational characteristics impact those contracts differently. We also analyze the case in which the firm can choose its initial capacity and find that, from the firm’s perspective, capacity and BI insurance could be either substitutes or complements.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuan-Mao Kao & N. Bora Keskin & Kevin Shang, 2022. "Impact of Information Asymmetry and Limited Production Capacity on Business Interruption Insurance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 2824-2841, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:68:y:2022:i:4:p:2824-2841
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2020.3776
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3776
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3776?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Rothschild & Joseph Stiglitz, 1976. "Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: An Essay on the Economics of Imperfect Information," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 90(4), pages 629-649.
    2. , & ,, 2012. "Optimal insurance with adverse selection," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 7(3), September.
    3. Ravi Anupindi & Ram Akella, 1993. "Diversification Under Supply Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(8), pages 944-963, August.
    4. Brian Tomlin, 2006. "On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 639-657, May.
    5. Kevin H. Shang & Jing-Sheng Song, 2006. "A Closed-Form Approximation for Serial Inventory Systems and Its Application to System Design," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 8(4), pages 394-406, September.
    6. Steven Shavell, 1979. "On Moral Hazard and Insurance," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 93(4), pages 541-562.
    7. Egri, Péter & Váncza, József, 2012. "Channel coordination with the newsvendor model using asymmetric information," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 491-499.
    8. Mussa, Michael & Rosen, Sherwin, 1978. "Monopoly and product quality," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 301-317, August.
    9. Lingxiu Dong & Brian Tomlin, 2012. "Managing Disruption Risk: The Interplay Between Operations and Insurance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(10), pages 1898-1915, October.
    10. Lawrence V. Snyder & Zümbül Atan & Peng Peng & Ying Rong & Amanda J. Schmitt & Burcu Sinsoysal, 2016. "OR/MS models for supply chain disruptions: a review," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(2), pages 89-109, February.
    11. Berger, Paul D. & Gerstenfeld, Arthur & Zeng, Amy Z., 2004. "How many suppliers are best? A decision-analysis approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 9-15, February.
    12. Lingxiu Dong & Sammi Yu Tang & Brian Tomlin, 2018. "Production Chain Disruptions: Inventory, Preparedness, and Insurance," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(7), pages 1251-1270, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wu, Qianni & Chiu, Chun-Hung, 2023. "The impacts of carbon insurance on supply chain and environment considering technology risk under cap-and-trade mechanism," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Zhongyi & Li, Mengyu & Lei, Ying & Zhai, Xin, 2022. "A joint strategy based on ordering and insurance for mitigating the effects of supply chain disruption on risk-averse firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    2. Preetam Basu & Soumita Ghosh & Milan Kumar, 2019. "Supplier ratings and dynamic sourcing strategies to mitigate supply disruption risks," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 46(1), pages 41-57, March.
    3. Long He & Ying Rong & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2020. "Product Sourcing and Distribution Strategies under Supply Disruption and Recall Risks," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(1), pages 9-23, January.
    4. Liu, Zhongyi & Li, Mengyu & Zhai, Xin, 2022. "Managing supply chain disruption threat via a strategy combining pricing and self-protection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    5. Süleyman Demirel & Roman Kapuscinski & Man Yu, 2018. "Strategic Behavior of Suppliers in the Face of Production Disruptions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 533-551, February.
    6. Svoboda, Josef & Minner, Stefan & Yao, Man, 2021. "Typology and literature review on multiple supplier inventory control models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 1-23.
    7. Meena, P.L. & Sarmah, S.P., 2013. "Multiple sourcing under supplier failure risk and quantity discount: A genetic algorithm approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 84-97.
    8. Xiao Huang, 2022. "Financing Disruptive Suppliers: Payment Advance, Timeline, and Discount Rate," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1115-1134, March.
    9. Soroush Saghafian & Mark P. Van Oyen, 2016. "Compensating for Dynamic Supply Disruptions: Backup Flexibility Design," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 390-405, April.
    10. Pritee Ray & Mamata Jenamani, 2016. "Sourcing decision under disruption risk with supply and demand uncertainty: A newsvendor approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 237-262, February.
    11. René Y. Glogg & Anna Timonina-Farkas & Ralf W. Seifert, 2022. "Modeling and mitigating supply chain disruptions as a bilevel network flow problem," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 395-423, July.
    12. Murat Erkoc & Haresh Gurnani & Saibal Ray & Mingzhu Jin, 2023. "Quality investment, inspection policy, and pricing decisions in a decentralized supply chain," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(1), pages 207-226, January.
    13. Qi Feng & Justin Jia & J. George Shanthikumar, 2019. "Dynamic Multisourcing with Dependent Supplies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 2770-2786, June.
    14. Pritee Ray & Mamata Jenamani, 2016. "Sourcing decision under disruption risk with supply and demand uncertainty: A newsvendor approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 237-262, February.
    15. Ni, Ni & Howell, Brendan J. & Sharkey, Thomas C., 2018. "Modeling the impact of unmet demand in supply chain resiliency planning," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-16.
    16. Wu, Qianni & Chiu, Chun-Hung, 2023. "The impacts of carbon insurance on supply chain and environment considering technology risk under cap-and-trade mechanism," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    17. Florian Lücker & Sunil Chopra & Ralf W. Seifert, 2021. "Mitigating Product Shortage Due to Disruptions in Multi‐Stage Supply Chains," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(4), pages 941-964, April.
    18. Silbermayr, Lena & Minner, Stefan, 2016. "Dual sourcing under disruption risk and cost improvement through learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(1), pages 226-238.
    19. Denderski, Piotr & Stoltenberg, Christian A., 2023. "On the existence of private unemployment insurance with advance information on future job losses," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    20. Chao Xue & Yan (Diana) Wu & Wanshan Zhu & Xiaobo Zhao & Jinghuo Chen, 2022. "Mitigating behavioral supply risk under dual sourcing: Evidence from an order allocation game," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1788-1801, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:68:y:2022:i:4:p:2824-2841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.