IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v67y2021i8p4686-4702.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Power of Opaque Products in Pricing

Author

Listed:
  • Adam N. Elmachtoub

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027)

  • Michael L. Hamilton

    (Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260)

Abstract

We study the power of selling opaque products, that is, products where a feature (such as color) is hidden from the customer until after purchase. Opaque products, which are sold with a price discount, have emerged as a powerful vehicle to increase revenue for many online retailers and service providers that offer horizontally differentiated items. In the opaque selling models we consider, all of the items are sold at a single common price alongside opaque products that may correspond to various subsets of the items. We consider two types of customers, risk-neutral ones, who assume they will receive a truly random item of the opaque product, and pessimistic ones, who assume they will receive their least favorite item of the opaque product. We benchmark opaque selling against two common selling strategies: discriminatory pricing, where one explicitly charges different prices for each item, and single pricing, where a single price is charged for all the items. We give a sharp characterization of when opaque selling outperforms discriminatory pricing; namely, this result holds for situations where all customers are pessimistic or the item valuations are supported on two points. In the latter case, we also show that opaque selling with just one opaque product guarantees at least 71.9% of the revenue from discriminatory pricing. We then provide upper bounds on the potential revenue increase from opaque selling strategies over single pricing and describe cases where the increase can be significantly more than that of discriminatory pricing. Finally, we provide pricing algorithms and conduct an extensive numerical study to assess the power of opaque selling for a variety valuation distributions and model extensions.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam N. Elmachtoub & Michael L. Hamilton, 2021. "The Power of Opaque Products in Pricing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(8), pages 4686-4702, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:67:y:2021:i:8:p:4686-4702
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2020.3750
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3750
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3750?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiao Huang & Greys Sošić & Gregory Kersten, 2017. "Selling through Priceline? On the impact of name-your-own-price in competitive market," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(3), pages 304-319, March.
    2. Chawla, Shuchi & Malec, David & Sivan, Balasubramanian, 2015. "The power of randomness in Bayesian optimal mechanism design," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 297-317.
    3. Ward Hanson & R. Kipp Martin, 1990. "Optimal Bundle Pricing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 155-174, February.
    4. Yongbo Xiao & Jian Chen, 2014. "Evaluating the potential effects from probabilistic selling of similar products," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(8), pages 604-620, December.
    5. Rachel R. Chen & Esther Gal-Or & Paolo Roma, 2014. "Opaque Distribution Channels for Competing Service Providers: Posted Price vs. Name-Your-Own-Price Mechanisms," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(4), pages 733-750, August.
    6. Anderson, Simon P & de Palma, Andre, 1992. "Multiproduct Firms: A Nested Logit Approach," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 261-276, September.
    7. Chen, Xi & Diakonikolas, Ilias & Paparas, Dimitris & Sun, Xiaorui & Yannakakis, Mihalis, 2018. "The complexity of optimal multidimensional pricing for a unit-demand buyer," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 139-164.
    8. Tingliang Huang & Yimin Yu, 2014. "Sell Probabilistic Goods? A Behavioral Explanation for Opaque Selling," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(5), pages 743-759, September.
    9. Alaei, Saeed & Hartline, Jason & Niazadeh, Rad & Pountourakis, Emmanouil & Yuan, Yang, 2019. "Optimal auctions vs. anonymous pricing," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 494-510.
    10. Nelson Granados & Kunsoo Han & Dan Zhang, 2018. "Demand and Revenue Impacts of an Opaque Channel: Evidence from the Airline Industry," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(11), pages 2010-2024, November.
    11. Sergiu Hart & Noam Nisan, 2014. "How Good Are Simple Mechanisms for Selling Multiple Goods?," Discussion Paper Series dp666, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    12. Dmitry Shapiro & Xianwen Shi, 2008. "Market Segmentation: The Role of Opaque Travel Agencies," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(4), pages 803-837, December.
    13. Guillermo Gallego & Robert Phillips, 2004. "Revenue Management of Flexible Products," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(4), pages 321-337, January.
    14. Steven C. Salop, 1979. "Monopolistic Competition with Outside Goods," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 10(1), pages 141-156, Spring.
    15. Kinshuk Jerath & Serguei Netessine & Senthil K. Veeraraghavan, 2010. "Revenue Management with Strategic Customers: Last-Minute Selling and Opaque Selling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(3), pages 430-448, March.
    16. L. Elisa Celis & Gregory Lewis & Markus Mobius & Hamid Nazerzadeh, 2014. "Buy-It-Now or Take-a-Chance: Price Discrimination Through Randomized Auctions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(12), pages 2927-2948, December.
    17. Scott Fay & Jinhong Xie, 2008. "Probabilistic Goods: A Creative Way of Selling Products and Services," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 674-690, 07-08.
    18. David Post & Martin Spann, 2012. "Improving Airline Revenues with Variable Opaque Products: “Blind Booking” at Germanwings," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 329-338, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Ming & Chen, Zhi-Long, 2024. "Stop clicking around and book direct: Impact of best rate guarantee on hotel pricing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(3), pages 1088-1104.
    2. Will Ma, 2023. "When Is Assortment Optimization Optimal?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(4), pages 2088-2105, April.
    3. Ben Li & Xiaolong Guo & Liang Liang, 2024. "Optimal pricing decision and capacity allocation of opaque selling in airline revenue management," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(4), pages 356-368, August.
    4. Daniel Freund & S'ebastien Martin & Jiayu Kamessi Zhao, 2024. "Two-Sided Flexibility in Platforms," Papers 2404.04709, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
    5. Zhang, Zihao & Zhang, Mengying, 2024. "Pricing and Capacity Allocation in Opaque Selling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(1), pages 230-241.
    6. Alonso, Juana M. & Socorro, M. Pilar, 2024. "Blind booking: The effects on passengers' purchase decision, airlines’ profitability, and tourist destinations," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    7. Shixin Wang, 2023. "The Power of Simple Menus in Robust Selling Mechanisms," Papers 2310.17392, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2024.
    8. Guo, Xiaolong & Bian, Junsong & Wu, Peiyan & Shi, Victor & Chen, Huangen, 2023. "Probabilistic product design with regret-anticipated consumers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Yi & Hua, Guowei & Cheng, T.C.E. & Zhang, Juliang & Fernandez, Vicenc, 2020. "Risk pooling through physical probabilistic selling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 295-311.
    2. Ningyuan Chen & Adam N. Elmachtoub & Michael L. Hamilton & Xiao Lei, 2021. "Loot Box Pricing and Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(8), pages 4809-4825, August.
    3. Zhang, Zihao & Zhang, Mengying, 2024. "Pricing and Capacity Allocation in Opaque Selling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(1), pages 230-241.
    4. Guang Yang & Ying Wang & Mulin Liu, 2023. "Optimal Policy for Probabilistic Selling with Three-Way Revenue Sharing Contract under the Perspective of Sustainable Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Yifan Wu & Shibo Jin, 2022. "Joint pricing and inventory decision under a probabilistic selling strategy," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1209-1233, April.
    6. Alonso, Juana M. & Socorro, M. Pilar, 2024. "Blind booking: The effects on passengers' purchase decision, airlines’ profitability, and tourist destinations," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    7. Fu, Qi & Wang, Qifei & Xu, Xiaoya & Lian, Zhaotong, 2017. "A two-product newsvendor system with a flexible product," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 590-601.
    8. Qing Li & Christopher S. Tang & He Xu, 2020. "Mitigating the Double‐Blind Effect in Opaque Selling: Inventory and Information," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(1), pages 35-54, January.
    9. Yeu-Shiang Huang & Tzu-Yi Wu & Chih-Chiang Fang & Tzu-Liang (Bill) Tseng, 2021. "Decisions on Probabilistic Selling for Consumers with Different Risk Attitudes," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 121-138, June.
    10. Zhang, Yi & Hua, Guowei & Wang, Shouyang & Zhang, Juliang & Fernandez, Vicenc, 2018. "Managing demand uncertainty: Probabilistic selling versus inventory substitution," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 56-67.
    11. Feng, Bo & Mao, Zhaofang & Li, Hui, 2021. "Choices for competing service providers with heterogeneous customers: Traditional versus opaque sales modes," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    12. Övünç Yılmaz & Pelin Pekgün & Mark Ferguson, 2017. "Would You Like to Upgrade to a Premium Room? Evaluating the Benefit of Offering Standby Upgrades," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 1-18, February.
    13. Guo, Xiaolong & Bian, Junsong & Wu, Peiyan & Shi, Victor & Chen, Huangen, 2023. "Probabilistic product design with regret-anticipated consumers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    14. Ruomeng Cui & Hyoduk Shin, 2018. "Sharing Aggregate Inventory Information with Customers: Strategic Cross-Selling and Shortage Reduction," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 381-400, January.
    15. Yong Chao & Lin Liu & Dongyuan Zhan, 2016. "Vertical Probabilistic Selling under Competition: the Role of Consumer Anticipated Regret," Working Papers 16-14, NET Institute.
    16. Klein, Robert & Koch, Sebastian & Steinhardt, Claudius & Strauss, Arne K., 2020. "A review of revenue management: Recent generalizations and advances in industry applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(2), pages 397-412.
    17. Ben Li & Xiaolong Guo & Liang Liang, 2024. "Optimal pricing decision and capacity allocation of opaque selling in airline revenue management," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(4), pages 356-368, August.
    18. Ying He & Huaxia Rui, 2022. "Probabilistic selling in vertically differentiated markets: The role of substitution," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(11), pages 4191-4204, November.
    19. David Sayah & Stefan Irnich, 2019. "Optimal booking control in revenue management with two substitutable resources," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 89(2), pages 189-222, April.
    20. Xufeng Yang & Juliang Zhang & Wen Jiao & Hong Yan, 2023. "Optimal Capacity Rationing Policy for a Container Leasing System with Multiple Kinds of Customers and Substitutable Containers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 1468-1485, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:67:y:2021:i:8:p:4686-4702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.