IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v81-82y2003i1p317-331.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An NPV and AC analysis of a stochastic inventory system with joint manufacturing and remanufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • van der Laan, Erwin

Abstract

While the net present value (NPV) approach is widely accepted as the right framework for studying production and inventory control systems, average cost (AC) models are more widely used. For the well known EOQ model it can be veri_ed that (under certain conditions) the AC approach gives near optimal results. This paper investigates whether the same holds for two-source systems with joint manufacturing and remanufacturing. It appears that the performance of the AC approach stands or falls with the right choice of the holding cost parameters. Through the analysis of a deterministic model a theoretical basis is provided for choosing the parameters. Then, given this set of holding cost parameters, the performance of the AC approach is tested in a stochastic model.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • van der Laan, Erwin, 2003. "An NPV and AC analysis of a stochastic inventory system with joint manufacturing and remanufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 317-331, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:81-82:y:2003:i:1:p:317-331
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925-5273(02)00297-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richter, Knut & Dobos, Imre, 1999. "Analysis of the EOQ repair and waste disposal problem with integer setup numbers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 463-467, March.
    2. Erwin van der Laan & Marc Salomon & Rommert Dekker & Luk Van Wassenhove, 1999. "Inventory Control in Hybrid Systems with Remanufacturing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(5), pages 733-747, May.
    3. Grubbstrom, Robert W. & Thorstenson, Anders, 1986. "Evaluation of capital costs in a multi-level inventory system by means of the annuity stream principle," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 136-145, January.
    4. G. Hadley, 1964. "A Comparison of Order Quantities Computed Using the Average Annual Cost and the Discounted Cost," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 472-476, April.
    5. Hofmann, Christian, 1998. "Investments in modern production technology and the cash flow-oriented EPQ-model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 193-206, January.
    6. Fleischmann, Moritz & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, Jacqueline M. & Dekker, Rommert & van der Laan, Erwin & van Nunen, Jo A. E. E. & Van Wassenhove, Luk N., 1997. "Quantitative models for reverse logistics: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Klein Haneveld, Willem K. & Teunter, Ruud H., 1998. "Effects of discounting and demand rate variability on the EOQ," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 173-192, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhou, Li & Naim, Mohamed M. & Ou Tang & Towill, Denis R., 2006. "Dynamic performance of a hybrid inventory system with a Kanban policy in remanufacturing process," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 585-598, December.
    2. Musa, Abubakar & Sani, Babangida, 2012. "Inventory ordering policies of delayed deteriorating items under permissible delay in payments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 75-83.
    3. Teunter, R.H. & van der Laan, E.A., 2003. "Valuation of inventories in systems with product recovery," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2003-29, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    4. BayIndIr, Z. Pelin & Dekker, Rommert & Porras, Eric, 2006. "Determination of recovery effort for a probabilistic recovery system under various inventory control policies," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 571-584, December.
    5. Carlo Alberto Magni, 2015. "ROI and profitability index: A note on managerial performance," Department of Economics 0048, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    6. Corbacioglu, Umut & van der Laan, Erwin A., 2007. "Setting the holding cost rates in a two-product system with remanufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(1-2), pages 185-194, September.
    7. Tsan-Ming Choi, 2016. "Multi-period risk minimization purchasing models for fashion products with interest rate, budget, and profit target considerations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 77-98, February.
    8. Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2015. "Aggregate Return On Investment for investments under uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 29-37.
    9. Giri, B. C. & Dohi, T., 2004. "Optimal lot sizing for an unreliable production system based on net present value approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 157-167, November.
    10. Tsan-Ming Choi, 2016. "Multi-period risk minimization purchasing models for fashion products with interest rate, budget, and profit target considerations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 77-98, February.
    11. Corbacıoğlu, U. & van der Laan, E.A., 2005. "Setting the holding cost rates in a multi-product system with remanufacturing," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2005-072-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    12. Teunter, Ruud & van der Laan, Erwin, 2002. "On the non-optimality of the average cost approach for inventory models with remanufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 67-73, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Corbacioglu, Umut & van der Laan, Erwin A., 2007. "Setting the holding cost rates in a two-product system with remanufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(1-2), pages 185-194, September.
    2. Farvid, Mojtaba & Rosling, Kaj, 2014. "The discounted (R,Q) inventory model—The Shrewd Accountant's Heuristic," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 17-27.
    3. Beullens, Patrick & Janssens, Gerrit K., 2011. "Holding costs under push or pull conditions - The impact of the Anchor Point," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(1), pages 115-125, November.
    4. Beullens, Patrick, 2014. "Revisiting foundations in lot sizing—Connections between Harris, Crowther, Monahan, and Clark," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 68-81.
    5. Bayindir, Z. Pelin & Erkip, Nesim & Gullu, Refik, 2003. "A model to evaluate inventory costs in a remanufacturing environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 597-607, January.
    6. Konstantaras, I. & Papachristos, S., 2007. "Optimal policy and holding cost stability regions in a periodic review inventory system with manufacturing and remanufacturing options," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(2), pages 433-448, April.
    7. Feng, Yan & Viswanathan, S., 2014. "Heuristics with guaranteed performance bounds for a manufacturing system with product recovery," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(2), pages 322-329.
    8. B C Giri & T Dohi, 2005. "Exact formulation of stochastic EMQ model for an unreliable production system," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(5), pages 563-575, May.
    9. Ramasesh, Ranga V., 2010. "Lot-sizing decisions under limited-time price incentives: A review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 118-135, June.
    10. repec:grz:wpsses:2013-01 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Xiting Gong & Xiuli Chao, 2013. "Technical Note---Optimal Control Policy for Capacitated Inventory Systems with Remanufacturing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 603-611, June.
    12. Ruud H. Teunter, 2001. "Economic ordering quantities for recoverable item inventory systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(6), pages 484-495, September.
    13. Shi, Jianmai & Zhang, Guoqing & Sha, Jichang, 2011. "Optimal production and pricing policy for a closed loop system," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(6), pages 639-647.
    14. V. Daniel R. Guide, Jr. & Ruud H. Teunter & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2003. "Matching Demand and Supply to Maximize Profits from Remanufacturing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 5(4), pages 303-316, October.
    15. Fleischmann, Moritz & Kuik, Roelof, 2003. "On optimal inventory control with independent stochastic item returns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(1), pages 25-37, November.
    16. Wei, Cansheng & Li, Yongjian & Cai, Xiaoqiang, 2011. "Robust optimal policies of production and inventory with uncertain returns and demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(2), pages 357-367, December.
    17. Perez Becker, Nicole & Arts, Joachim & Reichardt, Sven & Lange, Anne, 2024. "Managing inventories of reusable containers for food take-away at a restaurant," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    18. de Koster, M.B.M. & de Brito, M.P. & van de Vendel, M.A., 2002. "How to organise return handling; an exploratory study with nine retailer warehouses," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2002-11, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    19. Grubbström, Robert W., 2010. "The Newsboy problem when customer demand is a compound renewal process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(1), pages 134-142, May.
    20. Zhou, Li & Naim, Mohamed M. & Ou Tang & Towill, Denis R., 2006. "Dynamic performance of a hybrid inventory system with a Kanban policy in remanufacturing process," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 585-598, December.
    21. de Brito, Marisa P. & van der Laan, Erwin A., 2009. "Inventory control with product returns: The impact of imperfect information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(1), pages 85-101, April.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • L23 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Organization of Production
    • M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics
    • M11 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Production Management
    • R4 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:81-82:y:2003:i:1:p:317-331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.