IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v50y2004i12_supplementp1763-1763.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ten Most Influential Papers of Management Science's First Fifty Years

Author

Listed:
  • Wallace J. Hopp (Editor-in-Chief)

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208)

Abstract

In this issue, we reproduce 10 of the most important papers published in Management Science from 1954 to 2003. Each paper is followed by a commentary by the author(s) and other scholars that offers insights into the background, creation, or subsequent impact of the paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Wallace J. Hopp (Editor-in-Chief), 2004. "Ten Most Influential Papers of Management Science's First Fifty Years," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(12_supple), pages 1763-1763, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:50:y:2004:i:12_supplement:p:1763-1763
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0299
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0299?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thomas L. Magnanti, 2021. "Optimization: From Its Inception," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5349-5363, September.
    2. Ramírez-Hassan, Andrés & Montoya-Blandón, Santiago, 2020. "Forecasting from others’ experience: Bayesian estimation of the generalized Bass model," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 442-465.
    3. Singhal, Shakshi & Anand, Adarsh & Singh, Ompal, 2020. "Studying dynamic market size-based adoption modeling & product diffusion under stochastic environment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    4. Rovelli, Paola & Ferasso, Marcos & De Massis, Alfredo & Kraus, Sascha, 2022. "Thirty years of research in family business journals: Status quo and future directions," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 13(3).
    5. Wallace J. Hopp & David Simchi-Levi, 2021. "Management Science : The Legacy of the Past and Challenge of the Future," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5306-5316, September.
    6. Merigó, José M. & Yang, Jian-Bo, 2017. "A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 37-48.
    7. Vargas, Vicente, 2009. "An optimal solution for the stochastic version of the Wagner-Whitin dynamic lot-size model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(2), pages 447-451, October.
    8. Fibich, Gadi & Levin, Tomer, 2020. "Percolation of new products," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 540(C).
    9. Elmar Kiesling & Markus Günther & Christian Stummer & Lea Wakolbinger, 2012. "Agent-based simulation of innovation diffusion: a review," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 20(2), pages 183-230, June.
    10. Aleda Roth & Eve Rosenzweig, 2020. "Advancing Empirical Science in Operations Management Research: A Clarion Call to Action," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 179-190, January.
    11. Fleischhacker, Adam J. & Zhao, Yao, 2011. "Planning for demand failure: A dynamic lot size model for clinical trial supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 496-506, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:50:y:2004:i:12_supplement:p:1763-1763. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.