IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormksc/v43y2024i3p564-589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making a Smooth Exit? Menthol Bans and Cigarette Sales in Massachusetts

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Goli

    (Foster School of Business, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195)

  • Simha Mummalaneni

    (Foster School of Business, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195)

  • Pradeep K. Chintagunta

    (Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637)

Abstract

Public health regulators in the United States are currently advocating for a ban on menthol-flavored cigarettes because they are believed to be more dangerous than traditional nonmenthol cigarettes. However, these bans will have limited benefits if consumers are able to circumvent them. We examine this issue by evaluating the effects of a statewide menthol ban that was instituted by Massachusetts in 2020. An examination of store-level retail sales data from Massachusetts indicates that some demand shifted from menthols to nonmenthols after the ban was instituted, thereby supporting the goals of the ban. However, broadening our analysis to neighboring states shows a sharp increase in menthol sales in areas just outside the Massachusetts border, thereby suggesting that many Massachusetts residents were able to get around the ban by engaging in cross-state shopping for menthol cigarettes. This cross-state shopping is damaging because it reduces the tax revenue for Massachusetts while also not yielding any positive public health benefits among its population. To provide policy makers with guidance regarding the benefits of alternative policies, we develop and estimate a structural model that accounts for heterogeneity in (i) prices across states, (ii) distances from state borders, and (iii) menthol shares across Massachusetts. We show that a statewide menthol tax might be preferable over either a statewide menthol ban or a national ban because it yields sizable reductions in smoking activity while also generating up to 14% in additional tax revenue.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Goli & Simha Mummalaneni & Pradeep K. Chintagunta, 2024. "Making a Smooth Exit? Menthol Bans and Cigarette Sales in Massachusetts," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 564-589, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:43:y:2024:i:3:p:564-589
    DOI: 10.1287/mksc.2022.0361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2022.0361
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mksc.2022.0361?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali Goli & Simha Mummalaneni & Pradeep K. Chintagunta & Sanjay K. Dhar, 2022. "Show and Sell: Studying the Effects of Branded Cigarette Product Placement in TV Shows on Cigarette Sales," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(6), pages 1163-1180, November.
    2. Dmitry Arkhangelsky & Susan Athey & David A. Hirshberg & Guido W. Imbens & Stefan Wager, 2021. "Synthetic Difference-in-Differences," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(12), pages 4088-4118, December.
    3. André Bonfrer & Pradeep K. Chintagunta & John H. Roberts & David Corkindale, 2020. "Assessing the Sales Impact of Plain Packaging Regulation for Cigarettes: Evidence from Australia," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(1), pages 234-252, January.
    4. Jean-Pierre Dubé & Günter J. Hitsch & Peter E. Rossi, 2018. "Income and Wealth Effects on Private-Label Demand: Evidence from the Great Recession," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(1), pages 22-53, January.
    5. Paulo Albuquerque & Bart J. Bronnenberg, 2009. "Estimating Demand Heterogeneity Using Aggregated Data: An Application to the Frozen Pizza Category," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 356-372, 03-04.
    6. repec:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2016.303612_0 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Asplund, Marcus & Friberg, Richard & Wilander, Fredrik, 2007. "Demand and distance: Evidence on cross-border shopping," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1-2), pages 141-157, February.
    8. Yanwen Wang & Michael Lewis & Vishal Singh, 2016. "The Unintended Consequences of Countermarketing Strategies: How Particular Antismoking Measures May Shift Consumers to More Dangerous Cigarettes," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 55-72, January.
    9. Brett R. Gordon & Baohong Sun, 2015. "A Dynamic Model of Rational Addiction: Evaluating Cigarette Taxes," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 452-470, May.
    10. Christopher S. Carpenter & Hai V. Nguyen, 2021. "Intended and Unintended Effects of Banning Menthol Cigarettes," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 64(3), pages 629-650.
    11. Amil Petrin, 2002. "Quantifying the Benefits of New Products: The Case of the Minivan," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 110(4), pages 705-729, August.
    12. Polinski, J.M. & Howell, B. & Gagnon, M.A. & Kymes, S.M. & Brennan, T.A. & Shrank, W.H., 2017. "Impact of CVS pharmacy's discontinuance of tobacco sales on cigarette purchasing (2012-2014)," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(4), pages 556-562.
    13. Anna E. Tuchman, 2019. "Advertising and Demand for Addictive Goods: The Effects of E-Cigarette Advertising," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(6), pages 994-1022, November.
    14. Jialie Chen & Vithala R. Rao, 2020. "A Dynamic Model of Rational Addiction with Stockpiling and Learning: An Empirical Examination of E-cigarettes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(12), pages 5886-5905, December.
    15. Ali Goli & Pradeep K. Chintagunta, 2021. "What Happens When a Retailer Drops a Product Category? Investigating the Consequences of Ending Tobacco Sales," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(6), pages 1169-1198, November.
    16. Deaton, Angus S & Muellbauer, John, 1980. "An Almost Ideal Demand System," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(3), pages 312-326, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali Goli & Simha Mummalaneni & Pradeep K. Chintagunta & Sanjay K. Dhar, 2022. "Show and Sell: Studying the Effects of Branded Cigarette Product Placement in TV Shows on Cigarette Sales," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(6), pages 1163-1180, November.
    2. Ali Goli & Pradeep K. Chintagunta, 2021. "What Happens When a Retailer Drops a Product Category? Investigating the Consequences of Ending Tobacco Sales," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(6), pages 1169-1198, November.
    3. Rachel Griffith & Lars Nesheim & Martin O'Connell, 2018. "Income effects and the welfare consequences of tax in differentiated product oligopoly," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 9(1), pages 305-341, March.
    4. Peter Davis & Pasquale Schiraldi, 2014. "The flexible coefficient multinomial logit (FC-MNL) model of demand for differentiated products," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 45(1), pages 32-63, March.
    5. Kidokoro, Yukihiro, 2016. "A micro foundation for discrete choice models with multiple categories of goods," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 54-72.
    6. Keaton Miller & Boyoung Seo, 2021. "The Effect of Cannabis Legalization on Substance Demand and Tax Revenues," National Tax Journal, University of Chicago Press, vol. 74(1), pages 107-145.
    7. Inge Geyskens & Barbara Deleersnyder & Marnik G. Dekimpe & Didi Lin, 2024. "Do consumers benefit from national-brand listings by hard discounters?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 97-118, January.
    8. Fabian Dunker & Konstantin Eckle & Katharina Proksch & Johannes Schmidt-Hieber, 2017. "Tests for qualitative features in the random coefficients model," Courant Research Centre: Poverty, Equity and Growth - Discussion Papers 225, Courant Research Centre PEG.
    9. Victor Aguirregabiria & Margaret Slade, 2017. "Empirical models of firms and industries," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 50(5), pages 1445-1488, December.
    10. Carl F. Mela, 2011. "Structural Workshop Paper --Data Selection and Procurement," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(6), pages 965-976, November.
    11. Pinkse, Joris & Slade, Margaret E., 2004. "Mergers, brand competition, and the price of a pint," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 617-643, June.
    12. Shuo Zhang & Tat Y. Chan & Xueming Luo & Xiaoyi Wang, 2022. "Time-Inconsistent Preferences and Strategic Self-Control in Digital Content Consumption," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 616-636, May.
    13. Minjung Kwon & Tülin Erdem & Masakazu Ishihara, 2023. "Counter-cyclical price promotion: Capturing seasonal changes in stockpiling and endogenous consumption," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 437-492, December.
    14. Piyush Anand & Vrinda Kadiyali, 2024. "Frontiers: Smoke and Mirrors: Impact of E-cigarette Taxes on Underage Social Media Posting," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 479-487, May.
    15. Sungho Park & Sachin Gupta, 2012. "Comparison of SML and GMM estimators for the random coefficient logit model using aggregate data," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 1353-1372, December.
    16. Bokhari, Farasat A.S. & Mariuzzo, Franco, 2018. "Demand estimation and merger simulations for drugs: Logits v. AIDS," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 653-685.
    17. Bradley T. Shapiro & Günter J. Hitsch & Anna E. Tuchman, 2021. "TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability: Generalizable Results From 288 Brands," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(4), pages 1855-1879, July.
    18. Sergio Aquino DeSouza, 2017. "A flexible nested logit model," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 37(4), pages 2854-2859.
    19. Escobari, Diego, 2017. "Airport, airline and departure time choice and substitution patterns: An empirical analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 198-210.
    20. Richard Friberg & Frode Steen & Simen A. Ulsaker, 2022. "Hump-Shaped Cross-Price Effects and the Extensive Margin in Cross-Border Shopping," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(2), pages 408-438, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:43:y:2024:i:3:p:564-589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.