IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormksc/v3y1984i4p267-287.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Investigation into the Order of the Brand Choice Process

Author

Listed:
  • Frank M. Bass

    (The University of Texas at Dallas)

  • Moshe M. Givon

    (Tel Aviv University)

  • Manohar U. Kalwani

    (Purdue University)

  • David Reibstein

    (University of Pennsylvania)

  • Gordon P. Wright

    (Purdue University)

Abstract

This paper investigates the order of the brand choice process at the individual family level using a variety of tests: , likelihood ratio, binomial runs, and multinomial runs tests. The test of stationarity developed permits separate analyses for stationary and nonstationary purchase sequences. Our analyses indicate that the purchase sequences of a majority of stationary consumers are consistent with the zero-order assumption. This result is observed for all the nine frequently-bought packaged goods studied with the use of panel data and for a product category (soft drinks) using experimental data.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank M. Bass & Moshe M. Givon & Manohar U. Kalwani & David Reibstein & Gordon P. Wright, 1984. "An Investigation into the Order of the Brand Choice Process," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 267-287.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:3:y:1984:i:4:p:267-287
    DOI: 10.1287/mksc.3.4.267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.3.4.267
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mksc.3.4.267?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marshall Freimer & Dan Horsky, 2008. "Try It, You Will Like It—Does Consumer Learning Lead to Competitive Price Promotions?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 796-810, 09-10.
    2. Ehrenberg, Andrew S. C. & Uncles, Mark D. & Goodhardt, Gerald J., 2004. "Understanding brand performance measures: using Dirichlet benchmarks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(12), pages 1307-1325, December.
    3. Julia Levine & Stephan Seiler, 2023. "Identifying State Dependence in Brand Choice: Evidence from Hurricanes," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(5), pages 934-957, September.
    4. Julia Levine & Stephan Seiler, 2022. "Identifying State Dependence in Brand Choice: Evidence from Hurricanes," CESifo Working Paper Series 9889, CESifo.
    5. Mayukh Dass & Masoud Moradi & Fereshteh Zihagh, 2023. "Forecasting purchase rates of new products introduced in existing categories," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(3), pages 385-408, September.
    6. Park, Changwon & Senauer, Benjamin, 1996. "Estimation Of Household Brand-Size Choice Models For Spaghetti Products With Scanner Data," Working Papers 14336, University of Minnesota, The Food Industry Center.
    7. Koen Pauwels & Dominique M. Hanssens, 2007. "Performance Regimes and Marketing Policy Shifts," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 293-311, 05-06.
    8. Jackson, Tyrone W. & Perloff, Jeffrey M, 1996. "Personal computer brand loyalty," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt3w5958mx, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    9. Dipak Jain & Shun- Chen Niu, 1987. "A Stochastic Model of Household Brand Switching Behavior," Discussion Papers 732, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    10. Wu, Couchen & Chen, Hsiu-Li, 2000. "Counting your customers: Compounding customer's in-store decisions, interpurchase time and repurchasing behavior," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 109-119, November.
    11. Jackson, Tyrone W. & Perloff, Jeffrey M, 1996. "Personal computer brand loyalty," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt3w5958mx, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    12. Sanjay K. Dhar & Jagmohan S. Raju, 1998. "The Effects of Cross-Ruff Coupons on Sales and Profits," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(11-Part-1), pages 1501-1516, November.
    13. Bogomolova, Svetlana & Anesbury, Zachary & Lockshin, Larry & Kapulski, Natasha & Bogomolov, Tim, 2019. "Exploring the incidence and antecedents of buying an FMCG brand and UPC for the first time," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 121-129.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:3:y:1984:i:4:p:267-287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.