IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormksc/v14y1995i3_supplementpg101-g108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competitive Response and Equilibria

Author

Listed:
  • Rajiv Lal

    (Stanford University)

  • V. Padmanabhan

    (Stanford University)

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between market share and promotional expenditures the long run. Using data that span a decade and 91 product categories we find that market shares are stationary for a majority of the products in the data base. We find that relative promotional expenditures for the products are offsetting in the long run. Finally, for products whose market shares show a trend, it is difficult to discern the impact of relative promotional expenditure on the evolution of market share. This result generalizes the empirical finding of Bass et al. (Bass, F. M., M. M. Givon, M. U. Kalwani, D. Reibstein, G. P. Wright. 1984. An investigation into the order of the brand choice process. (4) 267–287.) that “... offsetting competitive activity plays a role in the maintenance of what appears to be stationary and zero order behavior.”

Suggested Citation

  • Rajiv Lal & V. Padmanabhan, 1995. "Competitive Response and Equilibria," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(3_supplem), pages 101-108.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:14:y:1995:i:3_supplement:p:g101-g108
    DOI: 10.1287/mksc.14.3.G101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.14.3.G101
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mksc.14.3.G101?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rutger van Oest & Philip Hans Franses, 2003. "Which Brands gain Share from which Brands? Inference from Store-Level Scanner Data," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 03-079/4, Tinbergen Institute.
    2. Randolph E. Bucklin & Sunil Gupta, 1999. "Commercial Use of UPC Scanner Data: Industry and Academic Perspectives," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 247-273.
    3. Debanjan Mitra & Peter N. Golder, 2006. "How Does Objective Quality Affect Perceived Quality? Short-Term Effects, Long-Term Effects, and Asymmetries," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 230-247, 05-06.
    4. Horváth, C. & Franses, Ph.H.B.F., 2003. "Deriving dynamic marketing effectiveness from econometric time series models," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2003-079-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    5. Rutger Oest, 2005. "Which Brands Gain Share from Which Brands? Inference from Store-Level Scanner Data," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 281-304, September.
    6. Jinhong Xie & Steven M. Shugan, 2001. "Electronic Tickets, Smart Cards, and Online Prepayments: When and How to Advance Sell," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 219-243, June.
    7. Deleersnyder, B. & Dekimpe, M.G. & Sarvary, M. & Parker, P.M., 2003. "Weathering Tight Economic Times: The Sales Evolution Of Consumer Durables Over The Business Cycle," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2003-046-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    8. G. Dekimpe, Marnik & Hanssens, Dominique M. & Silva-Risso, Jorge M., 1998. "Long-run effects of price promotions in scanner markets," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 89(1-2), pages 269-291, November.
    9. Sang Yong Kim & Richard Staelin, 1999. "Manufacturer Allowances and Retailer Pass-Through Rates in a Competitive Environment," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 59-76.
    10. Varman, Rohit & Costa, Janeen Arnold, 2009. "Competitive and Cooperative Behavior in Embedded Markets: Developing an Institutional Perspective on Bazaars," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 85(4), pages 453-467.
    11. Kumar, V. & Pereira, Arun, 1997. "Assessing the Competitive Impact of Type, Timing, Frequency, and Magnitude of Retail Promotions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 1-13, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:14:y:1995:i:3_supplement:p:g101-g108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.