IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v8y1997i1p1-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Choices in the Development of Interorganizational Information Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Vivek Choudhury

    (226 Mervis Hall, Joseph M. Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260)

Abstract

This paper discusses two critical strategic choices that a firm must make in developing interorganizational information systems (IOISs)--- what kind(s) of IOIS(s) to develop, and how to develop the IOIS(s). With respect to the kinds of IOISs, it proposes a typology of three different types of IOISs: electronic monopolies, electronic dyads, and multilateral IOISs. With respect to development approach, a firm can develop an IOIS competitively or cooperatively. Based on a case study of the development of IOISs in the aircraft parts industry, two sets of transaction characteristics---demand uncertainty and market variability---were found to influence the choice of IOISs. Two factors---strategic significance of the IOIS, and size and bargaining power of the firm---were found to influence the choice of development approach. The observations from the case study are used to develop a set of propositions about when a firm will choose a particular IOIS and whether a cooperative or a competitive approach will be used.

Suggested Citation

  • Vivek Choudhury, 1997. "Strategic Choices in the Development of Interorganizational Information Systems," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(1), pages 1-24, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:8:y:1997:i:1:p:1-24
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.8.1.1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.1.1
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.8.1.1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ibrahim, M.K.M. & Ribbers, P.M.A. & Bettonvil, B.W.M., 2007. "Human Knowledge Resources and Interorganizational Systems," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2007-046-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    2. Daning Hu & Sherry X. Sun & J. Leon Zhao & Xinlei Zhao, 2011. "Strategic choices of inter-organizational information systems: A network perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 13(5), pages 681-692, November.
    3. Büttgen, Marion & al.,, 2021. "Blockchain in Service Management and Service Research - Developing a Research Agenda and Managerial Implications," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 5(2), pages 71-102.
    4. Nelson, Matthew L. & Shaw, Michael J., 2005. "Interorganizational System Standards Diffusion: The Role of Industry-Based Standards Development Organizations," Working Papers 05-0126, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    5. Nelson Granados & Alok Gupta & Robert J. Kauffman, 2010. "Research Commentary---Information Transparency in Business-to-Consumer Markets: Concepts, Framework, and Research Agenda," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 207-226, June.
    6. Maggie Chuoyan Dong & Yulin Fang & Detmar W. Straub, 2017. "The Impact of Institutional Distance on the Joint Performance of Collaborating Firms: The Role of Adaptive Interorganizational Systems," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 309-331, June.
    7. Nagy, A., 2009. "Adoption of interorganizational information systems : The adoption position model," Other publications TiSEM af471297-bf03-43bf-88c1-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Roman Lukyanenko & Jeffrey Parsons & Yolanda F. Wiersma, 2014. "The IQ of the Crowd: Understanding and Improving Information Quality in Structured User-Generated Content," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 669-689, December.
    9. Gautam Ray & Dazhong Wu & Prabhudev Konana, 2009. "Competitive Environment and the Relationship Between IT and Vertical Integration," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 585-603, December.
    10. Yuliang Yao & Martin Dresner & Jonathan Palmer, 2009. "Private Network EDI vs. Internet Electronic Markets: A Direct Comparison of Fulfillment Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(5), pages 843-852, May.
    11. Srinivasan, Mahesh & Srivastava, Prashant & Iyer, Karthik N.S., 2020. "Response strategy to environment context factors using a lean and agile approach: Implications for firm performance," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 900-913.
    12. Kim, Daekwan & Shin, Geon-Cheol & Jean, Ruey-Jer “Bryan” & Tamer Cavusgil, S. & Chen, Charles, 2023. "Degree of involvement in supply chain system development and relational performance: A potential dark side in supply chain relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    13. Minu Ipe & T. S. Raghu & Ajay Vinze, 2010. "Information intermediaries for emergency preparedness and response: A case study from public health," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 67-79, March.
    14. Dipanjan Chatterjee & T. Ravichandran, 2013. "Governance of Interorganizational Information Systems: A Resource Dependence Perspective," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 261-278, June.
    15. Byungjoon Yoo & Vidyanand Choudhary & Tridas Mukhopadhyay, 2007. "Electronic B2B Marketplaces with Different Ownership Structures," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(6), pages 952-961, June.
    16. Yang Liu & Moses Olabhele Esangbedo & Sijun Bai, 2019. "Adaptability of Inter-Organizational Information Systems Based on Organizational Identity: Some Factors of Partnership for the Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:8:y:1997:i:1:p:1-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.