IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v35y2024i3p917-935.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Crafting Effective Theoretical Contributions for Empirical Papers in Economics of Information Systems: Some Editorial Reflections

Author

Listed:
  • Anandasivam Gopal

    (Nanyang Business School, Nanyang Technological University, 639956 Singapore)

  • Pei-yu Chen

    (W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287)

  • Wonseok Oh

    (College of Business, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 02455, Korea)

  • Sean Xin Xu

    (School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Suprateek Sarker

    (McIntire School of Commerce, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903)

Abstract

The terms theory and theoretical contributions evoke mixed reactions in the information systems discipline, especially among empirical researchers in the economics of information systems (Econ-IS) area. Although some see such contributions as the raison d’etre for academic scholars engaged in research, others feel that the discipline has developed a fetish for theory, with reviewers and editors often demanding an unreasonable level of theoretical contributions for empirical manuscripts to succeed in the review process. Moreover, there exists a great deal of diversity in the conception of what constitutes a reasonable theoretical contribution, especially within empirical work, across editors and reviewers, leading to frustration with the review process and disappointment with editorial decisions. Given the different types of theoretical contributions that may be suitable for a given manuscript and recognizing the changing nature of empirical work within Econ-IS, we attempt to shed some light on theoretical contributions within empirical Econ-IS research, paying attention to their nature, types, and impact. Specifically, we start by reflecting on the typical theory-related comments we have seen in review packets that we generalize to a set of critiques often related to empirical papers. Subsequently, we provide a working definition of a theoretical contribution and the components that make up such a contribution. We then propose a taxonomy of theoretical contributions typically observed in Information Systems Research ( ISR ). Based on this taxonomy of contributions, the typical critiques observed in empirical Econ-IS papers, and a set of published papers, we provide some broad guidelines for how authors may craft an effective theoretical contribution for submission to ISR . We also discuss a pathway for manuscripts that do not (seek to) offer significant theoretical contributions. Such manuscripts are welcome, but we believe that a very high bar of practical impact must be met for them to succeed in the review process. Based on the guidelines and suggestions made here, our hope is that authors and evaluators will participate in the review process with a shared understanding of the elusive notion of theoretical contributions.

Suggested Citation

  • Anandasivam Gopal & Pei-yu Chen & Wonseok Oh & Sean Xin Xu & Suprateek Sarker, 2024. "On Crafting Effective Theoretical Contributions for Empirical Papers in Economics of Information Systems: Some Editorial Reflections," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 917-935, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:35:y:2024:i:3:p:917-935
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.2024.editorial.v35.n3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2024.editorial.v35.n3
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.2024.editorial.v35.n3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nishtha Langer & Sandra A. Slaughter & Tridas Mukhopadhyay, 2014. "Project Managers' Practical Intelligence and Project Performance in Software Offshore Outsourcing: A Field Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 364-384, June.
    2. Xitong Li & Jörn Grahl & Oliver Hinz, 2022. "How Do Recommender Systems Lead to Consumer Purchases? A Causal Mediation Analysis of a Field Experiment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 620-637, June.
    3. Williamson, Oliver E, 1979. "Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractural Relations," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 22(2), pages 233-261, October.
    4. Sotaro Shibayama & Jian Wang, 2020. "Measuring originality in science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 409-427, January.
    5. Jeremy Watson & Gordon Burtch & Brad N. Greenwood, 2024. "Do digital technologies reduce racially biased reporting? Evidence from NYPD administrative data," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 121(24), pages 2402375121-, June.
    6. Erin Leahey & Jina Lee & Russell J. Funk, 2023. "What Types of Novelty Are Most Disruptive?," American Sociological Review, , vol. 88(3), pages 562-597, June.
    7. Panagiotis Adamopoulos & Anindya Ghose & Vilma Todri, 2018. "The Impact of User Personality Traits on Word of Mouth: Text-Mining Social Media Platforms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 612-640, September.
    8. Alok Gupta, 2018. "Editorial—Traits of Successful Research Contributions for Publication in ISR : Some Thoughts for Authors and Reviewers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 779-786, December.
    9. Ahmed Abbasi & Jeffrey Parsons & Gautam Pant & Olivia R. Liu Sheng & Suprateek Sarker, 2024. "Pathways for Design Research on Artificial Intelligence," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 441-459, June.
    10. Gerard Hoberg & Gordon Phillips, 2016. "Text-Based Network Industries and Endogenous Product Differentiation," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 124(5), pages 1423-1465.
    11. Suprateek Sarker & Edgar A. Whitley & Khim-Yong Goh & Yili (Kevin) Hong & Magnus Mähring & Pallab Sanyal & Ning Su & Heng Xu & Jingjun David Xu & Jingjing Zhang & Huimin Zhao, 2023. "Editorial: Some Thoughts on Reviewing for Information Systems Research and Other Leading Information Systems Journals," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 1321-1338, December.
    12. Hyeokkoo Eric Kwon & Hyunji So & Sang Pil Han & Wonseok Oh, 2016. "Excessive Dependence on Mobile Social Apps: A Rational Addiction Perspective," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 919-939, December.
    13. Sanjith Gopalakrishnan & Moksh Matta & Hasan Cavusoglu, 2022. "The Dark Side of Technological Modularity: Opportunistic Information Hiding During Interorganizational System Adoption," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 1072-1092, September.
    14. Jiyong Park & Min-Seok Pang & Junetae Kim & Byungtae Lee, 2021. "The Deterrent Effect of Ride-Sharing on Sexual Assault and Investigation of Situational Contingencies," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 497-516, June.
    15. Yue Guan & Yong Tan & Qiang Wei & Guoqing Chen, 2023. "When Images Backfire: The Effect of Customer-Generated Images on Product Rating Dynamics," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 1641-1663, December.
    16. Steven L. Johnson & Hani Safadi & Samer Faraj, 2015. "The Emergence of Online Community Leadership," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 165-187, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ma, Xiaofang & Wang, Wenming & Wu, Jiangang & Zhang, Wenlan, 2020. "Corporate customer concentration and stock price crash risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Kershen Huang & Chenguang Shang & Chi Zhang, 2021. "Working hard for long‐distance relationships: Geographic proximity and relationship‐specific investments," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 50(4), pages 985-1011, December.
    3. Mihov, Atanas & Naranjo, Andy, 2017. "Customer-base concentration and the transmission of idiosyncratic volatility along the vertical chain," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 73-100.
    4. Liu, Claire & Masulis, Ronald W. & Stanfield, Jared, 2021. "Why CEO option compensation can be a bad option for shareholders: Evidence from major customer relationships," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 453-481.
    5. Chen, Kai, 2022. "Suppliers' relationship-specific investments and customers' management forecasts," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    6. Han, Shaojie & Su, Jingqin & Lyu, Yibo & Liu, Qing, 2022. "How do business incubators govern incubation relationships with different new ventures?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    7. Mariani, Marcello M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2020. "Exploring how consumer goods companies innovate in the digital age: The role of big data analytics companies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 338-352.
    8. Manuel Ammann & Philipp Horsch & David Oesch, 2016. "Competing with Superstars," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(10), pages 2842-2858, October.
    9. Pietro Cunha Dolci & Antonio Carlos Gastaud Maçada, 2014. "Information technology investments and supply chain governance," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 18(2), pages 217-235.
    10. Junyon Im & Sunny Sun, 2015. "Profits and outreach to the poor: The institutional logics of microfinance institutions," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 95-117, March.
    11. Jonathan H. Reed, 2022. "Operational and strategic change during temporary turbulence: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 589-608, June.
    12. Ariño, Africa & Reuer, Jeffrey J., 2004. "Alliance contractual design," IESE Research Papers D/572, IESE Business School.
    13. Peter G. Klein & Michael E. Sykuta, 2010. "Editors’ Introduction," Chapters, in: Peter G. Klein & Michael E. Sykuta (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Transaction Cost Economics, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Sheikh, Shahbaz, 2018. "The impact of market competition on the relation between CEO power and firm innovation," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 36-50.
    15. Hoontaek Seo & Sangho Yi & William McCumber, 2024. "Friendly Boards and the Cost of Debt," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-17, July.
    16. Robert S. Gibbons & Manuel Grieder & Holger Herz & Christian Zehnder, 2019. "Building an Equilibrium: Rules Versus Principles in Relational Contracts," CESifo Working Paper Series 7871, CESifo.
    17. Stefano Ciliberti & Simone Del Sarto & Angelo Frascarelli & Giulia Pastorelli & Gaetano Martino, 2020. "Contracts to Govern the Transition towards Sustainable Production: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Analysis in the Durum Wheat Sector in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-14, November.
    18. Myint Moe Chit, 2018. "Political openness and the growth of small and medium enterprises: empirical evidence from transition economies," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 781-804, September.
    19. Kimmich, Christian & Fischbacher, Urs, 2016. "Behavioral determinants of supply chain integration and coexistence," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 55-77.
    20. Buckley, Peter J. & Cross, Adam & De Mattos, Claudio, 2015. "The principle of congruity in the analysis of international business cooperation," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 1048-1060.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:35:y:2024:i:3:p:917-935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.