IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v26y2015i2p418-436.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Road to Early Success: Impact of System Use in the Swift Response Phase

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Tong

    (Department of Information Systems, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong)

  • Sharon Swee-Lin Tan

    (Department of Information Systems, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117417)

  • Hock-Hai Teo

    (Department of Information Systems, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117417)

Abstract

When an enterprise system is introduced, system users often experience a performance dip as they struggle with the unfamiliar system. Appropriately managing this phase, which we term as the swift response phase (SRP), is vital given its prominent impact on the eventual success of the system. Yet, there is a glaring lack of studies that examine the SRP. Drawing on sensemaking theory and early postadoptive literature, this study seeks to propose a theory-driven model to understand how different support structures facilitate different forms of use-related activities to induce a positive performance in the SRP. The model was tested through a two-stage survey involving 329 nurses. The results demonstrated the discriminating alignment between information system (IS) use-related activity and support structures in enhancing system users’ work performance in the SRP. Specifically, suitability of impersonal support moderated the effects of standardized system use and individual adaption on performance, whereas availability of personal support only moderated the effect of nonstandardized system use on performance. For moderating role of personal support, IS specialists support had a lower influence than peer-champion support and peer-user support. This study contributes to the extant literature by (1) conceptualizing the turbulent SRP, (2) applying sensemaking theory to the initial postadoptive stage, (3) adding to the theoretical debate on the value of system use, and (4) unveiling the distinct roles of support structures under different types of use activities. Practical suggestions are provided for organizational management and policy makers to deal with the complexities in the SRP.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Tong & Sharon Swee-Lin Tan & Hock-Hai Teo, 2015. "The Road to Early Success: Impact of System Use in the Swift Response Phase," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 418-436, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:418-436
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.2015.0578
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0578
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.2015.0578?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philippe Monin & Niels Noorderhaven & Eero Vaara & David Kroon, 2013. "Giving Sense to and Making Sense of Justice in Postmerger Integration," Post-Print hal-02276708, HAL.
    2. Eitan Naveh & Tal Katz-Navon & Zvi Stern, 2005. "Treatment Errors in Healthcare: A Safety Climate Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(6), pages 948-960, June.
    3. Weiyin Hong & Frank K. Y. Chan & James Y. L. Thong & Lewis C. Chasalow & Gurpreet Dhillon, 2014. "A Framework and Guidelines for Context-Specific Theorizing in Information Systems Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 111-136, March.
    4. Philippe Monin & Niels Noorderhaven & Eero Vaara & David Kroon, 2013. "Giving Sense to and Making Sense of Justice in Postmerger Integration," Post-Print hal-02312831, HAL.
    5. Andrew Burton-Jones & Detmar W. Straub, 2006. "Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Test," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 228-246, September.
    6. Marie-Claude Boudreau & Daniel Robey, 2005. "Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 3-18, February.
    7. Henri Barki & Ryad Titah & Céline Boffo, 2007. "Information system use-related activity : An expanded behavioral conceptualization of individual-level information system use," Post-Print hal-02311855, HAL.
    8. Jie Mein Goh & Guodong (Gordon) Gao & Ritu Agarwal, 2011. "Evolving Work Routines: Adaptive Routinization of Information Technology in Healthcare," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 565-585, September.
    9. Henri Barki & Ryad Titah & Céline Boffo, 2007. "Information system use-related activity : An expanded behavioral conceptualization of individual-level information system use," Post-Print hal-02312468, HAL.
    10. Henri Barki & Ryad Titah & Céline Boffo, 2007. "Information System Use--Related Activity: An Expanded Behavioral Conceptualization of Individual-Level Information System Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 173-192, June.
    11. Michael H Morris & Duane L Davis & Jeffrey W Allen, 1994. "Fostering Corporate Entrepreneurship: Cross-Cultural Comparisons of the Importance of Individualism Versus Collectivism," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 25(1), pages 65-89, March.
    12. J. J. Po-An Hsieh & Arun Rai & Sean Xin Xu, 2011. "Extracting Business Value from IT: A Sensemaking Perspective of Post-Adoptive Use," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(11), pages 2018-2039, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean-Charles Pillet & Kevin Carillo & Claudio Vitari & Federico Pigni, 2020. "What Does It Do? Theorizing Functional Ambiguity As A Factor Influencing User Perceptions Of Information Technology," Post-Print hal-03026903, HAL.
    2. Jean-Charles Pillet & Kevin Carillo & Claudio Vitari & Federico Pigni, 2020. "What Does It Do? Theorizing Functional Ambiguity As A Factor Influencing User Perceptions Of Information Technology," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-03026903, HAL.
    3. Kwahk, Kee-Young & Ahn, Hyunchul & Ryu, Young U., 2018. "Understanding mandatory IS use behavior: How outcome expectations affect conative IS use," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 64-76.
    4. Efpraxia D. Zamani & Nancy Pouloudi & George M. Giaglis & Jonathan Wareham, 2022. "Appropriating Information Technology Artefacts through Trial and Error: The Case of the Tablet," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 97-119, February.
    5. Hillol Bala & Viswanath Venkatesh, 2016. "Adaptation to Information Technology: A Holistic Nomological Network from Implementation to Job Outcomes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(1), pages 156-179, January.
    6. Kwan Soo Hong & DonHee Lee, 2018. "Impact of operational innovations on customer loyalty in the healthcare sector," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(3), pages 575-600, September.
    7. Jani Merikivi & Antti Salovaara & Matti Mäntymäki & Lilong Zhang, 2018. "On the way to understanding binge watching behavior: the over-estimated role of involvement," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(1), pages 111-122, February.
    8. Ann-Frances Cameron & Jane Webster, 2013. "Multicommunicating: Juggling Multiple Conversations in the Workplace," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 352-371, June.
    9. Andrew Burton-Jones & Camille Grange, 2013. "From Use to Effective Use: A Representation Theory Perspective," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 632-658, September.
    10. Sun, Jonghak & Teng, James T.C., 2017. "The construct of information systems use benefits: Theoretical explication of its underlying dimensions and the development of a measurement scale," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 400-416.
    11. Shaw, Norman, 2014. "The role of the professional association: A grounded theory study of Electronic Medical Records usage in Ontario, Canada," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 200-209.
    12. Andrew Burton-Jones & Olga Volkoff, 2017. "How Can We Develop Contextualized Theories of Effective Use? A Demonstration in the Context of Community-Care Electronic Health Records," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 468-489, September.
    13. John D'Ambra & Concepción S. Wilson & Shahriar Akter, 2013. "Application of the task-technology fit model to structure and evaluate the adoption of E-books by Academics," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(1), pages 48-64, January.
    14. Suoniemi, Samppa & Terho, Harri & Zablah, Alex & Olkkonen, Rami & Straub, Detmar W., 2021. "The impact of firm-level and project-level it capabilities on CRM system quality and organizational productivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 108-122.
    15. Do Giang Nguyen & Minh-Tri Ha, 2022. "What Makes Users Continue to Want to Use the Digital Platform? Evidence From the Ride-Hailing Service Platform in Vietnam," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.
    16. Hilal Atasoy & Rajiv D. Banker & Paul A. Pavlou, 2021. "Information Technology Skills and Labor Market Outcomes for Workers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 437-461, June.
    17. Sven Dittes & Stefan Smolnik, 2019. "Towards a digital work environment: the influence of collaboration and networking on employee performance within an enterprise social media platform," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(8), pages 1215-1243, December.
    18. Bogicevic, Vanja & Bujisic, Milos & Bilgihan, Anil & Yang, Wan & Cobanoglu, Cihan, 2017. "The impact of traveler-focused airport technology on traveler satisfaction," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 351-361.
    19. John A. Kaliski & Queen E. Booker & Paul L. Schumann, 2012. "An Architecture For Dynamic E-Learning Environments Based On Student Activity And Learning Styles," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 4(2), pages 113-124.
    20. Clara Martos-Martínez & Marta Muñoz-Guarasa, 2021. "The Importance of Endogenous Resources for Internationalization: Competitive Advantages in the Olive Groves of Southern Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-30, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:418-436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.