IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v21y2010i4p941-959.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research Note ---Applying the Randomized Response Technique to Elicit Truthful Responses to Sensitive Questions in IS Research: The Case of Software Piracy Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel S. K. Kwan

    (Department of Information Systems, Business Statistics and Operations Management, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST), Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong)

  • Mike K. P. So

    (Department of Information and Systems, Business Statistics and Operations Management, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST), Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong)

  • Kar Yan Tam

    (Department of Information and Systems, Business Statistics and Operations Management, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST), Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong)

Abstract

Research on software piracy often relies on self-reports by individual users and thus suffers from possible response distortion attributable to a variety of human motivations. Conclusions drawn directly from distorted self-reports may misguide managerial and policy decisions. The randomized response technique (RRT) was proposed as a remedy to response distortion. In this paper, a model based on RRT was used to illustrate how truthful responses to sensitive questions can be empirically estimated. The model was tested in two empirical studies on software piracy. Consistent with our expectations, respondents responding to RRT were more willing to disclose sensitive information about their attitudes, intentions, and behaviors on software piracy. Nontrivial distortions were demonstrated in causal relationships involving sensitive and nonsensitive variables. The study extends RRT to multivariate analysis and illustrates the feasibility and usefulness of the method in studying sensitive behavioral issues in the information systems (IS) domain.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel S. K. Kwan & Mike K. P. So & Kar Yan Tam, 2010. "Research Note ---Applying the Randomized Response Technique to Elicit Truthful Responses to Sensitive Questions in IS Research: The Case of Software Piracy Behavior," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 941-959, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:21:y:2010:i:4:p:941-959
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.1090.0271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0271
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.1090.0271?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Steiger & Alexander Shapiro & Michael Browne, 1985. "On the multivariate asymptotic distribution of sequential Chi-square statistics," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(3), pages 253-263, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andy C. Y. Chong & Amanda M. Y. Chu & Mike K. P. So & Ray S. W. Chung, 2019. "Asking Sensitive Questions Using the Randomized Response Approach in Public Health Research: An Empirical Study on the Factors of Illegal Waste Disposal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Amanda M. Y. Chu & Mike K. P. So & Ray S. W. Chung, 2018. "Applying the Randomized Response Technique in Business Ethics Research: The Misuse of Information Systems Resources in the Workplace," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 195-212, August.
    3. Chu, Amanda M.Y. & Omori, Yasuhiro & So, Hing-yu & So, Mike K.P., 2023. "A Multivariate Randomized Response Model for Sensitive Binary Data," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 16-35.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fetene B. Tekle & Dereje W. Gudicha & Jeroen K. Vermunt, 2016. "Power analysis for the bootstrap likelihood ratio test for the number of classes in latent class models," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 10(2), pages 209-224, June.
    2. Linda Edelman & Helena Yli–Renko, 2010. "The Impact of Environment and Entrepreneurial Perceptions on Venture-Creation Efforts: Bridging the Discovery and Creation Views of Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(5), pages 833-856, September.
    3. Luengo, María Jesús & Obeso, María, 2013. "Efeito da hélice tríplice em desempenho de inovação," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 53(4), July.
    4. Randi Hammervold & Ulf Olsson, 2012. "Testing structural equation models: the impact of error variances in the data generating process," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1547-1570, August.
    5. Yli-Renko, H. & Autio, E. & Tontti, V., 2002. "Social capital, knowledge, and the international growth of technology-based new firms," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 279-304, June.
    6. Dirk Lubbe, 2023. "Advantages of Using Unweighted Approximation Error Measures for Model Fit Assessment," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(2), pages 413-433, June.
    7. Jinshu Cui & Heather Rosoff & Richard S. John, 2018. "Public Response to a Near‐Miss Nuclear Accident Scenario Varying in Causal Attributions and Outcome Uncertainty," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(5), pages 947-961, May.
    8. Hugo Horta & João M. Santos, 2016. "An instrument to measure individuals’ research agenda setting: the multi-dimensional research agendas inventory," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(3), pages 1243-1265, September.
    9. Ke-Hai Yuan & Peter Bentler, 2006. "Mean Comparison: Manifest Variable Versus Latent Variable," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(1), pages 139-159, March.
    10. Albert Satorra, 1989. "Alternative test criteria in covariance structure analysis: A unified approach," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 54(1), pages 131-151, March.
    11. Ogasawara, Haruhiko, 2015. "Asymptotic cumulants of some information criteria," ビジネス創造センターディスカッション・ペーパー (Discussion papers of the Center for Business Creation) 10252/5446, Otaru University of Commerce.
    12. Ke-Hai Yuan & Peter M. Bentler & Wei Zhang, 2005. "The Effect of Skewness and Kurtosis on Mean and Covariance Structure Analysis," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 34(2), pages 240-258, November.
    13. Claes Fornell & Youjae Yi, 1992. "Assumptions of the Two-Step Approach," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 20(3), pages 334-339, February.
    14. Ingo Balderjahn, 1988. "A note to Bollen's alternative fit measure," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 53(2), pages 283-285, June.
    15. Yuan, Ke-Hai & Hayashi, Kentaro & Bentler, Peter M., 2007. "Normal theory likelihood ratio statistic for mean and covariance structure analysis under alternative hypotheses," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(6), pages 1262-1282, July.
    16. Claudia Klüppelberg & Gabriel Kuhn, 2009. "Copula structure analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(3), pages 737-753, June.
    17. P. M. Bentler & Chih-Ping Chou, 1990. "Model Search With TETRAD II and EQS," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 19(1), pages 67-79, August.
    18. Ogasawara, Haruhiko, 2015. "Asymptotic cumulants of some information criteria (2nd version)," ビジネス創造センターディスカッション・ペーパー (Discussion papers of the Center for Business Creation) 10252/5497, Otaru University of Commerce.
    19. Ulf Henning Olsson & Tron Foss & Einar Breivik, 2004. "Two Equivalent Discrepancy Functions for Maximum Likelihood Estimation: Do Their Test Statistics Follow a Non-Central Chi-Square Distribution under Model Misspecification?," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 32(4), pages 453-500, May.
    20. Chou, Chih-Ping & Bentler, P. M., 2002. "Model modification in structural equation modeling by imposing constraints," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 271-287, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:21:y:2010:i:4:p:941-959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.