IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v45y2015i4p363-364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

People Skills: Building Analytics Decision Models That Managers Use—A Change Management Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Robert E. Levasseur

    (Walden University, St. Augustine, Florida 32084)

Abstract

This is another in a series of articles about some of the most effective models, methods, and processes of organization development (OD), also known as change management, a discipline that offers much to professionals intent on solving real-world problems. Because it is based on a systemic view of organizations, OD includes the whole universe of fuzzy people issues that increasingly determine the success or failure of efforts to implement otherwise flawless technical solutions. This article examines the increasingly important issue of how to develop prescriptive analytical models, particularly decision support models, that managers will use; suggests that classic operations research and management science model-building principles developed by John Little in the 1960s and 1970s are still applicable today; and examines why they work, based on fundamental principles of OD/change management developed by Kurt Lewin.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert E. Levasseur, 2015. "People Skills: Building Analytics Decision Models That Managers Use—A Change Management Perspective," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 363-364, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:45:y:2015:i:4:p:363-364
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.2015.0798
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.2015.0798
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.2015.0798?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert E. Levasseur, 2010. "People Skills: Ensuring Project Success---A Change Management Perspective," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 40(2), pages 159-162, April.
    2. John D. C. Little, 1970. "Models and Managers: The Concept of a Decision Calculus," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(8), pages 466-485, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. B. Gerasimov N. & K. Gerasimov B. & Б. Герасимов Н. & К. Герасимов Б., 2018. "Инструменты обеспечения технологий решения задач управления организации // Tools for Providing Technologies to Solve Organizational Management Problems," Управленческие науки // Management Science, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 8(1), pages 82-89.
    2. Diana Sánchez-Partida & Rodolfo Rodríguez-Méndez & José Luis Martínez-Flores & Santiago-Omar Caballero-Morales, 2018. "Implementation of Continuous Flow in the Cabinet Process at the Schneider Electric Plant in Tlaxcala, Mexico," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 48(6), pages 566-577, November.
    3. Mitchell A. Millstein & James F. Campbell, 2018. "Total Hockey Optimizes Omnichannel Facility Locations," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 48(4), pages 340-356, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. McCown, R. L., 2002. "Changing systems for supporting farmers' decisions: problems, paradigms, and prospects," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 179-220, October.
    2. Zhong, Tao & Young, Rhonda, 2010. "Multiple Choice Knapsack Problem: Example of planning choice in transportation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 128-137, May.
    3. Borgonovo, E., 2010. "Sensitivity analysis with finite changes: An application to modified EOQ models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 127-138, January.
    4. Kashan, Alireza Javanmardi & Lay, Janine & Wiewiora, Anna & Bradley, Lisa, 2022. "The innovation process in mining: Integrating insights from innovation and change management," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    5. Wiesel, Thorsten & Skiera, Bernd & Villanueva, Julian, 2011. "Customer Lifetime Value and Customer Equity Models Using Company-reported Summary Data," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 20-22.
    6. Fuglseth, A. M. & Grønhaug, K., 1997. "IT-enabled redesign of complex and dynamic business processes: the case of bank credit evaluation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 93-106, February.
    7. David A McDonald, 2016. "The weight of water: Benchmarking for public water services," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(11), pages 2181-2200, November.
    8. Stefan N. Groesser & Niklas Jovy, 2016. "Business model analysis using computational modeling: a strategy tool for exploration and decision-making," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 61-88, February.
    9. Donald G. Morrison & Jagmohan S. Raju, 2004. "50th Anniversary Article: The Marketing Department in Management Science: Its History, Contributions, and the Future," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(4), pages 425-428, April.
    10. de Brentani, Ulrike, 1995. "New industrial service development: Scenarios for success and failure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 93-103, February.
    11. McCown, R. L., 2002. "Locating agricultural decision support systems in the troubled past and socio-technical complexity of `models for management'," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 11-25, October.
    12. Albers, Sönke, 2012. "Optimizable and implementable aggregate response modeling for marketing decision support," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 111-122.
    13. Amelia Manuti & Maria Luisa Giancaspro & Monica Molino & Emanuela Ingusci & Vincenzo Russo & Fulvio Signore & Margherita Zito & Claudio Giovanni Cortese, 2020. "“Everything Will Be Fine”: A Study on the Relationship between Employees’ Perception of Sustainable HRM Practices and Positive Organizational Behavior during COVID19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, December.
    14. John H. Roberts & Charles J. Nelson & Pamela D. Morrison, 2005. "A Prelaunch Diffusion Model for Evaluating Market Defense Strategies," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 150-164, August.
    15. Marusia Ivanova, 2007. "Genesis and Evolution of Market Share Predictive Models," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 117-148.
    16. John R. Hauser & Guilherme (Gui) Liberali & Glen L. Urban, 2014. "Website Morphing 2.0: Switching Costs, Partial Exposure, Random Exit, and When to Morph," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1594-1616, June.
    17. Andris A. Zoltners & Prabhakant Sinha, 2005. "The 2004 ISMS Practice Prize Winner—Sales Territory Design: Thirty Years of Modeling and Implementation," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 313-331, September.
    18. Eva Ascarza & Scott A. Neslin & Oded Netzer & Zachery Anderson & Peter S. Fader & Sunil Gupta & Bruce G. S. Hardie & Aurélie Lemmens & Barak Libai & David Neal & Foster Provost & Rom Schrift, 2018. "In Pursuit of Enhanced Customer Retention Management: Review, Key Issues, and Future Directions," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 5(1), pages 65-81, March.
    19. Berend Wierenga & Gerrit H. Van Bruggen, 2001. "Developing a Customized Decision-Support System for Brand Managers," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 31(3_supplem), pages 128-145, June.
    20. Hensher, D. A. & Louviere, J. J. & Hansen, D. E., 2000. "The use of mixtures of market and experimental choice data in establishing guideline weights for evaluating competitive bids in a transport organisation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 279-286, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:45:y:2015:i:4:p:363-364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.