IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v40y2010i3p208-221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kaizen and Stochastic Networks Support the Investigation of Aircraft Failures

Author

Listed:
  • Izack Cohen

    (Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion, Technion City, Haifa 32000, Israel)

Abstract

Investigating the causes of aircraft failures and preventing their reoccurrence are crucial to achieving and maintaining a high flight safety level; technical failure-analysis teams usually perform these functions. We developed and applied a dual-phased process to improve the investigative procedures that these teams use. In the first phase we used a Kaizen method to reconstruct the investigation process. In the second phase we created a simulation model of the resulting stochastic processing network to evaluate alternative configurations. The results indicated a significant improvement in throughput time and investigation quality. In addition, this unique improvement process could be adapted for use by the many organizations that concurrently run several types of jobs (or projects) in a stochastic and dynamic environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Izack Cohen, 2010. "Kaizen and Stochastic Networks Support the Investigation of Aircraft Failures," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 208-221, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:40:y:2010:i:3:p:208-221
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.1090.0488
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.1090.0488
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.1090.0488?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James R. Bradley & Jim Willett, 2004. "Cornell Students Participate in Lord Corporation's Kaizen Projects," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 451-459, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Furlan & Ambra Galeazzo & Adriano Paggiaro, 2019. "Organizational and Perceived Learning in the Workplace: A Multilevel Perspective on Employees’ Problem Solving," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 280-297, March.
    2. Robert B. Handfield & Steven A. Edwards & Jeffrey S. Stonebraker, 2011. "NC State's Supply Chain Resource Cooperative Educates in the Real World," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 41(6), pages 548-563, December.
    3. Michael F. Gorman, 2010. "The University of Dayton Operations Management Capstone Course: Undergraduate Student Field Consulting Applies Theory to Practice," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 40(6), pages 432-443, December.
    4. Michael F. Gorman, 2018. "A Survey of Research in Field-Based Education: A Summary of Process, Best Practices, and Lessons Learned," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 145-161, May.
    5. Janine Sanders Jones & John R. Olson & Peter Southard, 2021. "Kaizen Events at the University of St. Thomas: Experiential Learning for Students," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 115-129, September.
    6. Farris, Jennifer A. & Van Aken, Eileen M. & Doolen, Toni L. & Worley, June, 2009. "Critical success factors for human resource outcomes in Kaizen events: An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 42-65, January.
    7. Glover, Wiljeana J. & Farris, Jennifer A. & Van Aken, Eileen M. & Doolen, Toni L., 2011. "Critical success factors for the sustainability of Kaizen event human resource outcomes: An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 197-213, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:40:y:2010:i:3:p:208-221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.