IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v35y2005i5p353-369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Merrill Lynch Improves Liquidity Risk Management for Revolving Credit Lines

Author

Listed:
  • Tom Duffy

    (Merrill Lynch Global Bank Group, 34th Floor, 250 Vesey Street, New York, New York 10080)

  • Manos Hatzakis

    (Merrill Lynch Management Science Group, PO Box 9065, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-9065)

  • Wenyue Hsu

    (Merrill Lynch Bank USA, PO Box 9018, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-9018)

  • Russ Labe

    (Merrill Lynch Management Science Group, PO Box 9065, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-9065)

  • Bonnie Liao

    (Merrill Lynch Management Science Group, PO Box 9065, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-9065)

  • Xiangdong (Sheldon) Luo

    (Merrill Lynch Bank USA, PO Box 9018, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-9018)

  • Je Oh

    (Merrill Lynch Management Science Group, PO Box 9065, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-9065)

  • Adeesh Setya

    (Merrill Lynch Bank USA, PO Box 9018, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-9018)

  • Lihua Yang

    (Merrill Lynch Management Science Group, PO Box 9065, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-9065)

Abstract

Merrill Lynch Bank USA has a multibillion dollar portfolio of revolving credit-line commitments with over 100 institutions. These credit lines give corporations access to a specified amount of cash for short-term funding needs. A key risk associated with credit lines is liquidity risk, or the risk that the bank will need to provide significant assets to the borrowers on short notice. We developed a Monte Carlo simulation to analyze liquidity risk of a revolving credit portfolio. The model incorporates a mix of OR/MS techniques, including a Markov transition process, expert-system rules, and correlated random variables to capture the impact of industry correlations among the borrowers. Results from the model enabled the bank to free up about $4 billion of liquidity. Over the 21 months since the bank implemented the model, the portfolio has expanded by 60 percent to over $13 billion. The model has become part of the bank’s tool kit for managing liquidity risk and continues to be used every month.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom Duffy & Manos Hatzakis & Wenyue Hsu & Russ Labe & Bonnie Liao & Xiangdong (Sheldon) Luo & Je Oh & Adeesh Setya & Lihua Yang, 2005. "Merrill Lynch Improves Liquidity Risk Management for Revolving Credit Lines," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 353-369, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:35:y:2005:i:5:p:353-369
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.1050.0157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.1050.0157
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.1050.0157?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anil K. Kashyap & Raghuram Rajan & Jeremy C. Stein, 2002. "Banks as Liquidity Providers: An Explanation for the Coexistence of Lending and Deposit‐taking," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 57(1), pages 33-73, February.
    2. Jafry, Yusuf & Schuermann, Til, 2004. "Measurement, estimation and comparison of credit migration matrices," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(11), pages 2603-2639, November.
    3. Kanatas, George, 1987. "Commercial paper, bank reserve requirements, and the informational role of loan commitments," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 425-448, September.
    4. Beverly Hirtle & Mark E. Levonian & Marc R. Saidenberg & Stefan Walter & David M. Wright, 2001. "Using credit risk models for regulatory capital: issues and options," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, issue Mar, pages 19-36.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Grundke, Peter & Kühn, André, 2020. "The impact of the Basel III liquidity ratios on banks: Evidence from a simulation study," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 167-190.
    2. Raj Nigam, 2008. "Structuring and Sustaining Excellence in Management Science at Merrill Lynch," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 202-209, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evan Gatev & Philip E. Strahan, 2003. "Banks' Advantage in Hedging Liquidity Risk: Theory and Evidence from the Commercial Paper Market," Center for Financial Institutions Working Papers 03-01, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.
    2. Evan Gatev & Philip E. Strahan, 2003. "Banks' Advantage in Hedging Liquidity Risk: Theory and Evidence from the Commercial Paper Market," NBER Working Papers 9956, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Deep, Akash & Schaefer, Guido, 2004. "Are Banks Liquidity Transformers?," Working Paper Series rwp04-022, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    4. O. Emre Ergungor, 2000. "Relationship loans and information exploitability in a competitive market: loan commitments vs. spot loans," Working Papers (Old Series) 0013, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
    5. María Hierro & Adolfo Maza, 2015. "From Discrete To Continuous-Time Transition Matrices In Intra-Distribution Dynamics Analysis: An Application To Per Capita Wealth In Europe," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(3), pages 227-235, July.
    6. Andrea Orame, 2020. "The role of bank supply in the Italian credit market: evidence from a new regional survey," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1279, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    7. Kapoor, Supriya & Peia, Oana, 2021. "The impact of quantitative easing on liquidity creation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    8. Paul Pelzl & María Teresa Valderrama, 2019. "Capital regulations and the management of credit commitments during crisis times," DNB Working Papers 661, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department.
    9. Wajeeh Mustafa Sarsour & Shamsul Rijal Muhammad Sabri, 2020. "A Simulation Study: Obtaining a Sufficient Sample Size of Discrete-Time Markov Chains of Investment in a Short Frequency of Time," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(8), pages 906-919, August.
    10. Kevin F. Kiernan & Vladimir Yankov & Filip Zikes, 2021. "Liquidity Provision and Co-insurance in Bank Syndicates," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2021-060, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    11. Goetz, Martin R. & Laeven, Luc & Levine, Ross, 2016. "Does the geographic expansion of banks reduce risk?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 346-362.
    12. Berger, Allen N. & Boot, Arnoud W.A., 2024. "Financial intermediation services and competition analyses: Review and paths forward for improvement," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    13. Felipe Restrepo & Lina Cardona‐Sosa & Philip E. Strahan, 2019. "Funding Liquidity without Banks: Evidence from a Shock to the Cost of Very Short‐Term Debt," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 74(6), pages 2875-2914, December.
    14. Ildiko Orban & Oday Tamimi, 2020. "Accounting Model for Impairment under IFRS 9 and its Impact on Loss Allowance," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 1259-1277.
    15. Gabriel Jiménez & Jose A. Lopez & Jesus Saurina, 2009. "Empirical Analysis of Corporate Credit Lines," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(12), pages 5069-5098, December.
    16. Heitor Almeida & Murillo Campello & Igor Cunha & Michael S. Weisbach, 2014. "Corporate Liquidity Management: A Conceptual Framework and Survey," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 6(1), pages 135-162, December.
    17. Mark A. Carlson & Burcu Duygan-Bump & William R. Nelson, 2015. "Why Do We Need Both Liquidity Regulations and a Lender of Last Resort? A Perspective from Federal Reserve Lending during the 2007-09 U.S. Financial Crisis," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2015-11, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    18. Kanga, Désiré & Murinde, Victor & Soumaré, Issouf, 2020. "Capital, risk and profitability of WAEMU banks: Does bank ownership matter?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    19. Bok Baik & Wooseok Choi, 2010. "Managing Earnings Surprises in Japan: Perspectives from Main Bank Relationships and Institutional Ownership," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5‐6), pages 495-517, June.
    20. Cappelletti, Giuseppe & Mistrulli, Paolo Emilio, 2023. "The role of credit lines and multiple lending in financial contagion and systemic events," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:35:y:2005:i:5:p:353-369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.