IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v34y2022i5p2443-2463.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fine-Grained Job Salary Benchmarking with a Nonparametric Dirichlet Process–Based Latent Factor Model

Author

Listed:
  • Qingxin Meng

    (University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315104, China)

  • Keli Xiao

    (Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794)

  • Dazhong Shen

    (University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230052, China)

  • Hengshu Zhu

    (Baidu Talent Intelligence Center, Baidu Inc., Haidian, Beijing 100085, China)

  • Hui Xiong

    (AI Thrust, the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong)

Abstract

As a key decision-making process in compensation and benefits (C&B) in human resource management, job salary benchmarking (JSB) plays an indispensable role in attracting, motivating, and retaining talent. Whereas the existing research mainly focuses on revealing the essential impacts of personal and organizational characteristics and economic factors on labor costs (e.g., C&B), few studies target optimizing JSB from a practical, data-driven perspective. Traditional approaches suffer from issues that result from using small and sparse data as well as from the limitations of linear statistical models in practice. Furthermore, there are also important technical issues that need to be addressed in the small number of machine learning–based JSB approaches, such as “cold start” issues when considering a brand-new type of company or job or model interpretability issues. To this end, we propose to address the JSB problem with data-driven techniques from a fine-grained perspective by modeling large-scale, real-world online recruitment data. Specifically, we develop a nonparametric Dirichlet process–based latent factor model (NDP-JSB) to jointly model the latent representations of both company and job position and then apply the model to predict salaries based on company and position information. Our model strengthens the usage of data-driven approaches in JSB optimization by addressing the aforementioned issues in existing models. For evaluation, extensive experiments are conducted on two large-scale, real-world data sets. Our results validate the effectiveness of the NDP-JSB and demonstrate its strength in providing interpretable salary benchmarking to benefit complex decision-making processes in talent management. Summary of Contribution: This paper bridges the cutting-edge machine learning techniques to their implementation in a practical operation research problem in human resources. We focus on optimizing the salary-matching work to help the companies to seek reasonable salaries for their positions by proposing a data-driven approach to capture hidden patterns from user and company profiles. The contributions of this work reside in both operation research and computing. We (1) formulate the JSB optimization problem and (2) solve it by developing a data-driven method along with an effective algorithm optimization. Moreover, the proposed methodology has strengths in addressing the issues of data sparseness and result interpretability.

Suggested Citation

  • Qingxin Meng & Keli Xiao & Dazhong Shen & Hengshu Zhu & Hui Xiong, 2022. "Fine-Grained Job Salary Benchmarking with a Nonparametric Dirichlet Process–Based Latent Factor Model," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2443-2463, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:34:y:2022:i:5:p:2443-2463
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2022.1182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2022.1182
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2022.1182?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siwei Cheng & Ruwei Dai & Weixuan Xu & Yong Shi, 2006. "Research On Data Mining And Knowledge Management And Its Applications In China'S Economic Development: Significance And Trend," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(04), pages 585-596.
    2. James Gong & Siyi Li, 2013. "CEO incentives and earnings prediction," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 647-674, May.
    3. Daniel D. Lee & H. Sebastian Seung, 1999. "Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization," Nature, Nature, vol. 401(6755), pages 788-791, October.
    4. Faulkender, Michael & Yang, Jun, 2010. "Inside the black box: The role and composition of compensation peer groups," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 257-270, May.
    5. Brick, Ivan E. & Palmon, Oded & Wald, John K., 2006. "CEO compensation, director compensation, and firm performance: Evidence of cronyism?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 403-423, June.
    6. Eric Blankmeyer & James P. LeSage & J. R. Stutzman & Kris Joseph Knox & R. Kelley Pace, 2011. "Peer‐group dependence in salary benchmarking: a statistical model," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(2), pages 91-104, March.
    7. David M. Steiger, 2010. "Decision Support as Knowledge Creation: A Business Intelligence Design Theory," International Journal of Business Intelligence Research (IJBIR), IGI Global, vol. 1(1), pages 29-47, January.
    8. Lin Peng & Ailsa Roell, 2008. "Manipulation and Equity-Based Compensation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(2), pages 285-290, May.
    9. Guo, Yue & Barnes, Stuart J. & Jia, Qiong, 2017. "Mining meaning from online ratings and reviews: Tourist satisfaction analysis using latent dirichlet allocation," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 467-483.
    10. John Jerrim, 2015. "Do college students make better predictions of their future income than young adults in the labor force?," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 162-179, April.
    11. Zoubin Ghahramani, 2015. "Probabilistic machine learning and artificial intelligence," Nature, Nature, vol. 521(7553), pages 452-459, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Budsaratragoon, Pornanong & Lhaopadchan, Suntharee & Thomsen, Steen, 2020. "Community and compensation: Director remuneration in Thailand," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    2. Andres, Christian & Fernau, Erik & Theissen, Erik, 2014. "Should I stay or should I go? Former CEOs as monitors," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 26-47.
    3. Zhiqiang Lu & Sarath Abeysekera & Hongyu Li, 2015. "Executive Compensation Stickiness And Peer Group Benchmarks: Evidence From Chinese Firms," The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 9(5), pages 25-36.
    4. Goh, Lisa & Gupta, Aditi, 2016. "Remuneration of non-executive directors: Evidence from the UK," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 379-399.
    5. Ann-Christine Schulz & Miriam Flickinger, 2020. "Does CEO (over)compensation influence corporate reputation?," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 903-927, August.
    6. Ferris, Stephen P. & Liao, Min-Yu (Stella) & Tamm, Chris, 2018. "The compensation of busy directors: An international analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 294-312.
    7. Zheng, Jiayi & Chowdhury, Hasibul & Hossain, Md Safayat & Gupta, Kartick, 2023. "Tournament-based incentives and media sentiment," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(2).
    8. Gao, Huasheng & Luo, Juan & Tang, Tilan, 2015. "Effects of managerial labor market on executive compensation: Evidence from job-hopping," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 203-220.
    9. Chia-Chi Lu & Carl Hsin-han Shen & Pai-Ta Shih & Wei‐Che Tsai, 2023. "Option implied riskiness and risk-taking incentives of executive compensation," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 1143-1160, April.
    10. Frye, Melissa B. & Gatchev, Vladimir A. & Pham, Duong T., 2024. "Director self-dealing: Evidence from compensation peer groups," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    11. Imran Ali & Devika Kannan, 2022. "Mapping research on healthcare operations and supply chain management: a topic modelling-based literature review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(1), pages 29-55, August.
    12. Balafas, Nikolaos & Florackis, Chris, 2014. "CEO compensation and future shareholder returns: Evidence from the London Stock Exchange," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 97-115.
    13. Röell, Ailsa & Peng, Lin & Tang, Hongfei, 2016. "CEO Incentives: Measurement, Determinants, and Impact on Performance," CEPR Discussion Papers 11417, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Rafael Teixeira & Mário Antunes & Diogo Gomes & Rui L. Aguiar, 2024. "Comparison of Semantic Similarity Models on Constrained Scenarios," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 1307-1330, August.
    15. Vasilii Erokhin & Dmitry Endovitsky & Alexey Bobryshev & Natalia Kulagina & Anna Ivolga, 2019. "Management Accounting Change as a Sustainable Economic Development Strategy during Pre-Recession and Recession Periods: Evidence from Russia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, June.
    16. Anup Banerjee & Mattias Nordqvist & Karin Hellerstedt, 2020. "The role of the board chair—A literature review and suggestions for future research," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 372-405, November.
    17. Del Corso, Gianna M. & Romani, Francesco, 2019. "Adaptive nonnegative matrix factorization and measure comparisons for recommender systems," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 354(C), pages 164-179.
    18. Masafumi Nakano & Akihiko Takahashi & Soichiro Takahashi, 2018. "State Space Approach to Adaptive Artificial Intelligence Modeling: Application to Financial Portfolio with Fuzzy System," CARF F-Series CARF-F-422, Center for Advanced Research in Finance, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo.
    19. P Fogel & C Geissler & P Cotte & G Luta, 2022. "Applying separative non-negative matrix factorization to extra-financial data," Working Papers hal-03689774, HAL.
    20. Wang, Binni & Wang, Pong & Tu, Yiliu, 2021. "Customer satisfaction service match and service quality-based blockchain cloud manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:34:y:2022:i:5:p:2443-2463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.