IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v30y2018i3p438-453.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

T -Closeness Slicing: A New Privacy-Preserving Approach for Transactional Data Publishing

Author

Listed:
  • Mingzheng Wang

    (School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310058, China)

  • Zhengrui Jiang

    (College of Business, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011)

  • Haifang Yang
  • Yu Zhang

    (School of Management Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China
    School of Management Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China)

Abstract

Privacy-preserving data publishing has received much attention in recent years. Prior studies have developed various algorithms such as generalization , anatomy , and L-diversity slicing to protect individuals’ privacy when transactional data are published for public use. These existing algorithms, however, all have certain limitations. For instance, generalization protects identity privacy well but loses a considerable amount of information. Anatomy prevents attribute disclosure and lowers information loss, but fails to protect membership privacy. The more recent probability L-diversity slicing algorithm overcomes some shortcomings of generalization and anatomy, but cannot shield data from more subtle types of attacks such as skewness attack and similarity attack. To meet the demand of data owners with high privacy-preserving requirement, this study develops a novel method named t-closeness slicing (TCS) to better protect transactional data against various attacks. The time complexity of TCS is log-linear, hence the algorithm scales well with large data. We conduct experiments using three transactional data sets and find that TCS not only effectively protects membership privacy, identity privacy, and attribute privacy, but also preserves better data utility than benchmarking algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingzheng Wang & Zhengrui Jiang & Haifang Yang & Yu Zhang, 2018. "T -Closeness Slicing: A New Privacy-Preserving Approach for Transactional Data Publishing," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 438-453, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:30:y:2018:i:3:p:438-453
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2017.0791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2017.0791
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2017.0791?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Syam Menon & Sumit Sarkar & Shibnath Mukherjee, 2005. "Maximizing Accuracy of Shared Databases when Concealing Sensitive Patterns," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 256-270, September.
    2. Li, Xiao-Bai & Jacob, Varghese S., 2008. "Adaptive data reduction for large-scale transaction data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(3), pages 910-924, August.
    3. Xiao-Bai Li & Sumit Sarkar, 2009. "Against Classification Attacks: A Decision Tree Pruning Approach to Privacy Protection in Data Mining," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1496-1509, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiao-Bai Li & Jialun Qin, 2017. "Anonymizing and Sharing Medical Text Records," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 332-352, June.
    2. Manole VELICANU & Daniela LITAN & Aura-Mihaela MOCANU (VIRGOLICI), 2010. "Some Considerations about Modern Database Machines," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(2), pages 37-44.
    3. Urbinati, Andrea & Bogers, Marcel & Chiesa, Vittorio & Frattini, Federico, 2019. "Creating and capturing value from Big Data: A multiple-case study analysis of provider companies," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 84, pages 21-36.
    4. Syam Menon & Abhijeet Ghoshal & Sumit Sarkar, 2022. "Modifying Transactional Databases to Hide Sensitive Association Rules," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 152-178, March.
    5. Syam Menon & Sumit Sarkar, 2007. "Minimizing Information Loss and Preserving Privacy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 101-116, January.
    6. Abhijeet Ghoshal & Jing Hao & Syam Menon & Sumit Sarkar, 2020. "Hiding Sensitive Information when Sharing Distributed Transactional Data," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 473-490, June.
    7. Peng Cheng & Chun-Wei Lin & Jeng-Shyang Pan, 2015. "Use HypE to Hide Association Rules by Adding Items," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Nigel Melville & Michael McQuaid, 2012. "Research Note ---Generating Shareable Statistical Databases for Business Value: Multiple Imputation with Multimodal Perturbation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 559-574, June.
    9. Robert Garfinkel & Ram Gopal & Steven Thompson, 2007. "Releasing Individually Identifiable Microdata with Privacy Protection Against Stochastic Threat: An Application to Health Information," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 23-41, March.
    10. Meisel, Stephan & Mattfeld, Dirk, 2010. "Synergies of Operations Research and Data Mining," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 1-10, October.
    11. Zhang, Juheng & Aytug, Haldun, 2016. "Comparison of imputation methods for discriminant analysis with strategically hidden data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(2), pages 522-530.
    12. Damangir, Sina & Du, Rex Yuxing & Hu, Ye, 2018. "Uncovering Patterns of Product Co-consideration: A Case Study of Online Vehicle Price Quote Request Data," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1-17.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:30:y:2018:i:3:p:438-453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.