IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijds/v3y2024i1p68-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adaptive Exploration and Optimization of Materials Crystal Structures

Author

Listed:
  • Arvind Krishna

    (Department of Statistics and Data Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208)

  • Huan Tran

    (School of Material Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332)

  • Chaofan Huang

    (H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332)

  • Rampi Ramprasad

    (School of Material Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332)

  • V. Roshan Joseph

    (H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332)

Abstract

A central problem of materials science is to determine whether a hypothetical material is stable without being synthesized, which is mathematically equivalent to a global optimization problem on a highly nonlinear and multimodal potential energy surface (PES). This optimization problem poses multiple outstanding challenges, including the exceedingly high dimensionality of the PES, and that PES must be constructed from a reliable, sophisticated, parameters-free, and thus very expensive computational method, for which density functional theory (DFT) is an example. DFT is a quantum mechanics-based method that can predict, among other things, the total potential energy of a given configuration of atoms. DFT, although accurate, is computationally expensive. In this work, we propose a novel expansion-exploration-exploitation framework to find the global minimum of the PES. Starting from a few atomic configurations, this “known” space is expanded to construct a big candidate set. The expansion begins in a nonadaptive manner, where new configurations are added without their potential energy being considered. A novel feature of this step is that it tends to generate a space-filling design without the knowledge of the boundaries of the domain space. If needed, the nonadaptive expansion of the space of configurations is followed by adaptive expansion, where “promising regions” of the domain space (those with low-energy configurations) are further expanded. Once a candidate set of configurations is obtained, it is simultaneously explored and exploited using Bayesian optimization to find the global minimum. The methodology is demonstrated using a problem of finding the most stable crystal structure of aluminum.

Suggested Citation

  • Arvind Krishna & Huan Tran & Chaofan Huang & Rampi Ramprasad & V. Roshan Joseph, 2024. "Adaptive Exploration and Optimization of Materials Crystal Structures," INFORMS Joural on Data Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 68-83, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijds:v:3:y:2024:i:1:p:68-83
    DOI: 10.1287/ijds.2023.0028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijds.2023.0028
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijds.2023.0028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. V. Roshan Joseph & Evren Gul & Shan Ba, 2015. "Maximum projection designs for computer experiments," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 102(2), pages 371-380.
    2. Roustant, Olivier & Ginsbourger, David & Deville, Yves, 2012. "DiceKriging, DiceOptim: Two R Packages for the Analysis of Computer Experiments by Kriging-Based Metamodeling and Optimization," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 51(i01).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ehsan Mehdad & Jack P. C. Kleijnen, 2018. "Efficient global optimisation for black-box simulation via sequential intrinsic Kriging," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(11), pages 1725-1737, November.
    2. Leurent, Martin & Jasserand, Frédéric & Locatelli, Giorgio & Palm, Jenny & Rämä, Miika & Trianni, Andrea, 2017. "Driving forces and obstacles to nuclear cogeneration in Europe: Lessons learnt from Finland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 138-150.
    3. Diariétou Sambakhé & Lauriane Rouan & Jean-Noël Bacro & Eric Gozé, 2019. "Conditional optimization of a noisy function using a kriging metamodel," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 615-636, March.
    4. Biewen, Martin & Kugler, Philipp, 2021. "Two-stage least squares random forests with an application to Angrist and Evans (1998)," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    5. Xuefei Lu & Alessandro Rudi & Emanuele Borgonovo & Lorenzo Rosasco, 2020. "Faster Kriging: Facing High-Dimensional Simulators," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 233-249, January.
    6. Olgun Aydin & Bartłomiej Igliński & Krzysztof Krukowski & Marek Siemiński, 2022. "Analyzing Wind Energy Potential Using Efficient Global Optimization: A Case Study for the City Gdańsk in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    7. Francisco Castillo-Zunino & Pinar Keskinocak, 2021. "Bi-criteria multiple knapsack problem with grouped items," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 747-789, October.
    8. Kleijnen, Jack P.C. & Mehdad, Ehsan, 2014. "Multivariate versus univariate Kriging metamodels for multi-response simulation models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(2), pages 573-582.
    9. Erickson, Collin B. & Ankenman, Bruce E. & Sanchez, Susan M., 2018. "Comparison of Gaussian process modeling software," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 179-192.
    10. Song-Nan Liu & Min-Qian Liu & Jin-Yu Yang, 2023. "Construction of Column-Orthogonal Designs with Two-Dimensional Stratifications," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-27, March.
    11. Mehdad, E. & Kleijnen, Jack P.C., 2014. "Global Optimization for Black-box Simulation via Sequential Intrinsic Kriging," Other publications TiSEM 8fa8d96f-a086-4c4b-88ab-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    12. Leonardo Bargigli & Luca Riccetti & Alberto Russo & Mauro Gallegati, 2020. "Network calibration and metamodeling of a financial accelerator agent based model," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 15(2), pages 413-440, April.
    13. Victor Picheny & Mickael Binois & Abderrahmane Habbal, 2019. "A Bayesian optimization approach to find Nash equilibria," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 171-192, January.
    14. Torossian, Léonard & Picheny, Victor & Faivre, Robert & Garivier, Aurélien, 2020. "A review on quantile regression for stochastic computer experiments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    15. Yue Huan & Yubin Tian & Dianpeng Wang, 2022. "A Weighted Surrogate Model for Spatio-Temporal Dynamics with Multiple Time Spans: Applications for the Pollutant Concentration of the Bai River," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-16, October.
    16. Binois, M. & Ginsbourger, D. & Roustant, O., 2015. "Quantifying uncertainty on Pareto fronts with Gaussian process conditional simulations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(2), pages 386-394.
    17. Kleijnen, Jack P.C. & Mehdad, E. & van Beers, W.C.M., 2012. "Convex and monotonic bootstrapped kriging," Other publications TiSEM 972e079d-0209-45bf-b25e-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Kamiński, Bogumił, 2015. "A method for the updating of stochastic kriging metamodels," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 859-866.
    19. Krityakierne, Tipaluck & Baowan, Duangkamon, 2020. "Aggregated GP-based Optimization for Contaminant Source Localization," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    20. Li, Peiping & Wang, Yu, 2022. "An active learning reliability analysis method using adaptive Bayesian compressive sensing and Monte Carlo simulation (ABCS-MCS)," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijds:v:3:y:2024:i:1:p:68-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.