IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jebr00/v20y2024i1p1-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Online Review Influence on the Retail Industry: Theoretical Extension and Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Pooja Misra

    (Birla Institute of Management Technology, India)

  • Swarnava Dutta

    (Birla Institute of Management Technology, India)

  • Debajit Kumar Bhatta

    (Birla Institute of Management Technology, India)

Abstract

The research undertaken investigates the effect of online reviews on purchase emotions of young consumers with reference to National Capital Region of India. Quantitative aspects of online reviews, like reviewer quality, reviewer exposure, product attributes, and temporal effects have been considered. Based on literature review, the S-O-R model has been further built on and constructs of A.I.S.A.S. model, i.e., attention and trust, action and share have been incorporated to evaluate buying pattern and behaviour they follow related to online review. Interestingly, when consumers read online reviews, they concentrate not only on review scores but also refer to other textual information like a reviewer's trust and the content associated with it such as various pictures and videos. It is also seen that the market responds more favourably to reviews written by reviewers with better reputations and better exposure, i.e., the influencers. The study also aims to explore the strength of the relationship between the identified independent constructs of online reviews and buying behaviour of an individual.

Suggested Citation

  • Pooja Misra & Swarnava Dutta & Debajit Kumar Bhatta, 2024. "Online Review Influence on the Retail Industry: Theoretical Extension and Analysis," International Journal of E-Business Research (IJEBR), IGI Global, vol. 20(1), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jebr00:v:20:y:2024:i:1:p:1-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJEBR.338278
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thakur, Rakhi, 2018. "Customer engagement and online reviews," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 48-59.
    2. Tata, Sai Vijay & Prashar, Sanjeev & Gupta, Sumeet, 2020. "An examination of the role of review valence and review source in varying consumption contexts on purchase decision," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    3. Rese, Alexandra & Schreiber, Stefanie & Baier, Daniel, 2014. "Technology acceptance modeling of augmented reality at the point of sale: Can surveys be replaced by an analysis of online reviews?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 869-876.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. Narciso, 2022. "The Unreliability of Online Review Mechanisms," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 349-368, September.
    2. Joerß, Tom & Hoffmann, Stefan & Mai, Robert & Akbar, Payam, 2021. "Digitalization as solution to environmental problems? When users rely on augmented reality-recommendation agents," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 510-523.
    3. Pantano, Eleonora, 2016. "Engaging consumer through the storefront: Evidences from integrating interactive technologies," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 149-154.
    4. Stefan Hoffmann & Tom Joerß & Robert Mai & Payam Akbar, 2022. "Augmented reality-delivered product information at the point of sale: when information controllability backfires," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 743-776, July.
    5. Yongrong Xin & Muhammad Irfan & Bilal Ahmad & Madad Ali & Lanqi Xia, 2023. "Identifying How E-Service Quality Affects Perceived Usefulness of Online Reviews in Post-COVID-19 Context: A Sustainable Food Consumption Behavior Paradigm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Gao, Mengjia & Huang, Lin, 2021. "Quality of channel integration and customer loyalty in omnichannel retailing: The mediating role of customer engagement and relationship program receptiveness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    7. Agrawal, Shiv Ratan & Mittal, Divya, 2022. "Optimizing customer engagement content strategy in retail and E-tail: Available on online product review videos," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    8. Raoofpanah, Iman & Zamudio, César & Groening, Christopher, 2023. "Review reader segmentation based on the heterogeneous impacts of review and reviewer attributes on review helpfulness: A study involving ZIP code data," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    9. Savastano Marco & Anagnoste Sorin, 2020. "Pioneering Strategies in Retail Settings: An Empirical Study of Successful Practices," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 15(4), pages 643-663, December.
    10. S. Ananda & Raghavendra Prasanna Kumar & Dharmendra Singh, 2023. "A mediation analysis of perceived service quality, customer satisfaction and customer engagement in the banking sector," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(3), pages 570-584, September.
    11. Cohen, Justin & Sands, Sean & Campbell, Colin & Mavrommatis, Alexis, 2024. "Sonic sensations: Navigating the mixed outcomes of ASMR in retail advertising," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    12. Vieira, Valter Afonso & Rafael, Diego Nogueira & Agnihotri, Raj, 2022. "Augmented reality generalizations: A meta-analytical review on consumer-related outcomes and the mediating role of hedonic and utilitarian values," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 170-184.
    13. Li-Chen Yu & Chia-Lin Hsu, 2022. "Understanding Users’ Urge to Post Online Reviews: A Study Based on Existence, Relatedness, and Growth Theory," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    14. Eslami, Seyed Pouyan & Ghasemaghaei, Maryam, 2018. "Effects of online review positiveness and review score inconsistency on sales: A comparison by product involvement," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 74-80.
    15. Nannan Xi & Juan Chen & Filipe Gama & Marc Riar & Juho Hamari, 2023. "The challenges of entering the metaverse: An experiment on the effect of extended reality on workload," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 659-680, April.
    16. Lien Lamey & Els Breugelmans & Maya Vuegen & Anne ter Braak, 2021. "Retail service innovations and their impact on retailer shareholder value: evidence from an event study," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 811-833, July.
    17. Fernandes, Semila & Venkatesh, V.G. & Panda, Rajesh & Shi, Yangyan, 2021. "Measurement of factors influencing online shopper buying decisions: A scale development and validation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    18. Tim Hilken & Ko de Ruyter & Mathew Chylinski & Dominik Mahr & Debbie I. Keeling, 2017. "Augmenting the eye of the beholder: exploring the strategic potential of augmented reality to enhance online service experiences," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 884-905, November.
    19. Arghashi, Vahideh & Yuksel, Cenk Arsun, 2022. "Interactivity, Inspiration, and Perceived Usefulness! How retailers’ AR-apps improve consumer engagement through flow," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    20. Le, Loc Tuan & Ly, Pham Thi Minh & Nguyen, Nhan Thanh & Tran, Lobel Trong Thuy, 2022. "Online reviews as a pacifying decision-making assistant," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jebr00:v:20:y:2024:i:1:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.