IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmdma/v13y2014i4p403-421.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensitivity analysis on PROMETHEE and TOPSIS weights

Author

Listed:
  • Tolga Genc

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to determine the changes of the outrankings of alternatives due to the changes of weights. It is analysed that the altering of weights of PROMETHEE is how affecting the outrankings by using stability intervals. It is also tested that when the changes of weights in PROMETHEE are applied to TOPSIS weights at the same level, how the TOPSIS outranking alters. Weights are subjective factors in multi criteria decision making methods for that reason they vary in determination. When you change the weights, the outrankings of the methods alter. It will be interesting to discuss in this paper how the influence they have on the outrankings of the methods. Sensitivity analysis is performed over PROMETHEE and TOPSIS weights by using stability intervals. In this study the main focus will be stability intervals of weights and the altering of outrankings due to changing of weights. Stability intervals allow seeing at a glance in which ranges the weights of the different criteria could move without affecting the best solution.

Suggested Citation

  • Tolga Genc, 2014. "Sensitivity analysis on PROMETHEE and TOPSIS weights," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(4), pages 403-421.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:13:y:2014:i:4:p:403-421
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=65359
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khaled Alshehri & Mohadese Basirati & Devin Sapsford & Michael Harbottle & Peter Cleall, 2024. "Nature-Based Secondary Resource Recovery under Climate Change Uncertainty: A Robust Multi-Objective Optimisation Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-27, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:13:y:2014:i:4:p:403-421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=19 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.