IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/eujine/v10y2016i3p385-405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust efficiency measurement with common set of weights under varying degrees of conservatism and data uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Nazila Aghayi
  • Madjid Tavana
  • Mohammad Ali Raayatpanah

Abstract

The conventional paradigm in data envelopment analysis (DEA) is to develop an efficiency measurement model that assumes the input and output data are precise and equal to some nominal values. However, this paradigm does not take into consideration the inherent uncertainties in real-life performance measurement problems. As a result of these uncertainties, the input and output data may take non-nominal values and violate the basic assumptions in DEA. This phenomenon has motivated us to design a DEA model that is 'robust' and immune to uncertain data. We present a robust DEA model with a common set of weights (CSWs) under varying degrees of conservatism and data uncertainty. We use goal programming (GP) and compute the relative efficiencies of the decision making units (DMUs) by producing CSWs in one run. The proposed model uses a confidence criterion to produce a ranking of the DMUs and determine a set of efficient DMUs. We present a numerical example and a case study to exhibit the efficacy of the procedures and to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed method to a performance measurement problem in the banking industry. [Received 13 December 2014; Revised 13 August 2015; Accepted 19 January 2016]

Suggested Citation

  • Nazila Aghayi & Madjid Tavana & Mohammad Ali Raayatpanah, 2016. "Robust efficiency measurement with common set of weights under varying degrees of conservatism and data uncertainty," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(3), pages 385-405.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:10:y:2016:i:3:p:385-405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=76386
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Goto, Mika, 2001. "Slack-adjusted DEA for time series analysis: Performance measurement of Japanese electric power generation industry in 1984-1993," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 232-259, January.
    2. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    3. Avkiran, Necmi Kemal, 2015. "An illustration of dynamic network DEA in commercial banking including robustness tests," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 141-150.
    4. Cook, Wade D. & Seiford, Larry M., 2009. "Data envelopment analysis (DEA) - Thirty years on," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 1-17, January.
    5. ,, 2000. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(2), pages 287-299, April.
    6. Thompson, Russell G. & Langemeier, Larry N. & Lee, Chih-Tah & Lee, Euntaik & Thrall, Robert M., 1990. "The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1-2), pages 93-108.
    7. Lawrence M. Seiford & Joe Zhu, 1999. "Profitability and Marketability of the Top 55 U.S. Commercial Banks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(9), pages 1270-1288, September.
    8. Despotis, Dimitris K. & Smirlis, Yiannis G., 2002. "Data envelopment analysis with imprecise data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 24-36, July.
    9. Lawrence Seiford, 1997. "A bibliography for Data Envelopment Analysis (1978-1996)," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 73(0), pages 393-438, October.
    10. Fallahi, Alireza & Ebrahimi, Reza & Ghaderi, S.F., 2011. "Measuring efficiency and productivity change in power electric generation management companies by using data envelopment analysis: A case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6398-6405.
    11. K S Park, 2007. "Efficiency bounds and efficiency classifications in DEA with imprecise data," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(4), pages 533-540, April.
    12. Schaffnit, Claire & Rosen, Dan & Paradi, Joseph C., 1997. "Best practice analysis of bank branches: An application of DEA in a large Canadian bank," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 269-289, April.
    13. Cook, Wade D. & Kress, Moshe, 1991. "A multiple criteria decision model with ordinal preference data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 191-198, September.
    14. Wade D. Cook & Moshe Kress, 1990. "A Data Envelopment Model for Aggregating Preference Rankings," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(11), pages 1302-1310, November.
    15. Ghahtarani, Alireza & Najafi, Amir Abbas, 2013. "Robust goal programming for multi-objective portfolio selection problem," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 588-592.
    16. Sadjadi, S.J. & Omrani, H., 2008. "Data envelopment analysis with uncertain data: An application for Iranian electricity distribution companies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 4247-4254, November.
    17. C Kao & H-T Hung, 2005. "Data envelopment analysis with common weights: the compromise solution approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(10), pages 1196-1203, October.
    18. SHOKOUHI, Amir H. & HATAMI-MARBINI, Adel & TAVANA, Madjid & SAATI, Saber, 2010. "A robust optimization approach for imprecise data envelopment analysis," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2215, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aghayi, Nazila & Maleki, Bentolhoda, 2016. "Efficiency measurement of DMUs with undesirable outputs under uncertainty based on the directional distance function: Application on bank industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 376-387.
    2. Pejman Peykani & Jafar Gheidar-Kheljani & Reza Farzipoor Saen & Emran Mohammadi, 2022. "Generalized robust window data envelopment analysis approach for dynamic performance measurement under uncertain panel data," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 5529-5567, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hatami-Marbini, Adel & Arabmaldar, Aliasghar, 2021. "Robustness of Farrell cost efficiency measurement under data perturbations: Evidence from a US manufacturing application," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(2), pages 604-620.
    2. Toloo, Mehdi & Mensah, Emmanuel Kwasi & Salahi, Maziar, 2022. "Robust optimization and its duality in data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    3. HATAMI-MARBINI, Adel & AGRELL, Per & AGHAYI, Nazila, 2013. "Imprecise data envelopment analysis for the two-stage process," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2013004, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    4. Shabani, Amir & Visani, Franco & Barbieri, Paolo & Dullaert, Wout & Vigo, Daniele, 2019. "Reliable estimation of suppliers’ total cost of ownership: An imprecise data envelopment analysis model with common weights," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 57-70.
    5. Emmanuel Kwasi Mensah, 2020. "Robust data envelopment analysis via ellipsoidal uncertainty sets with application to the Italian banking industry," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 43(2), pages 491-518, December.
    6. Omrani, Hashem & Valipour, Mahsa & Emrouznejad, Ali, 2021. "A novel best worst method robust data envelopment analysis: Incorporating decision makers’ preferences in an uncertain environment," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 8(C).
    7. Qing Wang & Zhaojun Liu & Yang Zhang, 2017. "A Novel Weighting Method for Finding Common Weights in DEA," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(05), pages 1-21, October.
    8. Anna Labijak-Kowalska & Miłosz Kadziński, 2023. "Exact and stochastic methods for robustness analysis in the context of Imprecise Data Envelopment Analysis," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-34, March.
    9. Adler, Nicole & Friedman, Lea & Sinuany-Stern, Zilla, 2002. "Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 249-265, July.
    10. Xianmei Wang & Hanhui Hu, 2017. "Sustainability in Chinese Higher Educational Institutions’ Social Science Research: A Performance Interface toward Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Bi, Gong-Bing & Song, Wen & Zhou, P. & Liang, Liang, 2014. "Does environmental regulation affect energy efficiency in China's thermal power generation? Empirical evidence from a slacks-based DEA model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 537-546.
    12. Tatiana Bencova & Andrea Bohacikova, 2022. "DEA in Performance Measurement of Two-Stage Processes: Comparative Overview of the Literature," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 111-129.
    13. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2015. "Efficiency of the banking system in Vietnam under financial liberalization," OSF Preprints qsf6d, Center for Open Science.
    14. Friedman, Lea & Sinuany-Stern, Zilla, 1997. "Scaling units via the canonical correlation analysis in the DEA context," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(3), pages 629-637, August.
    15. Oliveira, Renata & Zanella, Andreia & Camanho, Ana S., 2019. "The assessment of corporate social responsibility: The construction of an industry ranking and identification of potential for improvement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 498-513.
    16. Park, K. Sam, 2010. "Duality, efficiency computations and interpretations in imprecise DEA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 289-296, January.
    17. Afsharian, Mohsen & Ahn, Heinz & Harms, Sören Guntram, 2021. "A review of DEA approaches applying a common set of weights: The perspective of centralized management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 3-15.
    18. Sinuany-Stern, Zilla & Friedman, Lea, 1998. "DEA and the discriminant analysis of ratios for ranking units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(3), pages 470-478, December.
    19. Adel Hatami-Marbini & Zahra Ghelej Beigi & Hirofumi Fukuyama & Kobra Gholami, 2015. "Modeling Centralized Resources Allocation and Target Setting in Imprecise Data Envelopment Analysis," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(06), pages 1189-1213, November.
    20. I. Contreras & S. Lozano & M. A. Hinojosa, 2021. "A bargaining approach to determine common weights in DEA," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 2181-2201, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:10:y:2016:i:3:p:385-405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=210 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.