IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jsd123/v9y2016i6p58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Passing the Scepter, not the Buck Long Arms in EU Climate Politics

Author

Listed:
  • Doris Fuchs
  • Berenike Feldhoff

Abstract

This paper investigates power dynamics between and within the core institutions of the European Union (EU) in the development of the 2030 EU climate & energy framework. Starting from the widely studied change in the EU’s climate policy from “leadership by example” to “slow motion”, it integrates a specific focus on power dynamics between the core EU institutions and non-state actors. Interestingly, perspectives on power relations between and within EU institutions and the power of non-state actors in EU governance are rarely integrated explicitly in analyses of the EU’s shift in its stance on climate policy. In this article, we aim to draw together the analyses of institutional power dynamics in EU climate policy with analyses of the exercise of power by non-state actors to explain the dynamics leading to the change in EU climate politics. Using data from document research, secondary literature and interviews conducted with members of EU institutions as well as non-state actors, we show that an absence of clear leadership from the European Council in the end furthered an extended influence of business actors via the strengthening of the Commission as well as particular DGs. The results show how inadequate guidance from the Council and divisions within the Commission facilitated the informal passing of the scepter of EU climate policy to business, even as EU institutions retained formal responsibility, thus not passing the buck in a corresponding manner. The analysis further reveals strong reasons for doubt towards future EU ambitions in global climate change politics.

Suggested Citation

  • Doris Fuchs & Berenike Feldhoff, 2016. "Passing the Scepter, not the Buck Long Arms in EU Climate Politics," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(6), pages 1-58, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:9:y:2016:i:6:p:58
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/download/61852/34975
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/view/61852
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bastiaan Apeldoorn, 2002. "The European Round Table of Industrialists: Still a Unique Player?," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Justin Greenwood (ed.), The Effectiveness of EU Business Associations, chapter 19, pages 194-205, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Edgar Grande, 2003. "How the Architecture of the EU Political System Influences Business Associations," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Justin Greenwood (ed.), The Challenge of Change in EU Business Associations, chapter 3, pages 45-59, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Ian Manners, 2002. "Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 235-258, June.
    4. Barnett, Michael N. & Finnemore, Martha, 1999. "The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(4), pages 699-732, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vanhoonacker, Sophie & Dijkstra, Hylke & Maurer Heidi, 2010. "Understanding the Role of Bureaucracy in the European Security and Defence Policy: The State of the Art," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 14, August.
    2. Peter Viggo Jakobsen, 2009. "Small States, Big Influence: The Overlooked Nordic Influence on the Civilian ESDP," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 81-102, January.
    3. Cynthia Couette, 2024. "Epistemic competition in global governance: The case of pharmaceutical patents," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(3), pages 516-527, June.
    4. Adler, Emanuel & Crawford, Beverly, 2004. "Normative Power: The European Practice of Region Building and the Case of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership (EMP)," Institute of European Studies, Working Paper Series qt6xx6n5p4, Institute of European Studies, UC Berkeley.
    5. Christopher Pallas & Johannes Urpelainen, 2012. "NGO monitoring and the legitimacy of international cooperation: A strategic analysis," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-32, March.
    6. J. C. Sharman, 2007. "Rationalist and Constructivist Perspectives on Reputation," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55(1), pages 20-37, March.
    7. Sigrid Quack & Marie-Laure Salles-Djelic, 2005. "Adaptation, Recombination and Reinforcement," Post-Print hal-01892003, HAL.
    8. repec:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i:s4:p:85-93 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Anna Michalski, 2013. "Europeanization of National Foreign Policy: The Case of Denmark's and Sweden's Relations with China," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 884-900, September.
    10. Armin Ibitz, 2015. "Towards a global scheme for carbon emissions reduction in aviation: China’s role in blocking the extension of the European Union’s Emissions Trading Scheme," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 113-130, June.
    11. Mehdi Abbas & Catherine Locatelli, 2019. "Interdependence as a lever for national hybridization: The EU-Russia gas trade [L’hybridation des systèmes institutionnels nationaux dans l’interdépendance. Les échanges gaziers UE-Russie]," Post-Print hal-02472141, HAL.
    12. Chris J. Bickerton & Bastien Irondelle & Anand Menon, 2011. "Security Co‐operation beyond the Nation‐State: The EU's Common Security and Defence Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 1-21, January.
    13. Aline Burni & Benedikt Erforth & Ina Friesen & Christine Hackenesch & Maximilian Hoegl & Niels Keijzer, 2022. "Who Called Team Europe? The European Union’s Development Policy Response During the First Wave of COVID-19," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(1), pages 524-539, February.
    14. Wolfgang Wagner, 2017. "Liberal Power Europe," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(6), pages 1398-1414, November.
    15. Böhling, Kathrin, 2009. "Symbolic knowledge at work: Comitology and learning from experts in European technology policy [Symbolisches Wissen in der europäischen Technologiepolitik: Experten, Lernen und das Ausschusswesen]," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2009-301, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    16. Merran Hulse, 2014. "Actorness beyond the European Union: Comparing the International Trade Actorness of SADC and ECOWAS," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 547-565, May.
    17. Maria J. Debre & Hylke Dijkstra, 2023. "Are international organisations in decline? An absolute and relative perspective on institutional change," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(1), pages 16-30, February.
    18. Frolov, Daniil, 2019. "From institutions to extitutions to the post-institutional theory of institutional anomalies," MPRA Paper 95960, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Sep 2019.
    19. Manuela Moschella, 2007. "An International Political Economy Approach to the Neighbourhood Policy. The ENP from the Enlargement and the Mediterranean Perspectives," European Political Economy Review, European Political Economy Infrastructure Consortium, vol. 7(Summer), pages 156-180.
    20. Naseemullah, Adnan, 2023. "The political economy of national development: A research agenda after neoliberal reform?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    21. Roter Petra, 2015. "International-local Linkages in Multistakeholder Partnerships Involved in Reconciliation, Inter-communal Bridgebuilding and Confidence-building," Croatian International Relations Review, Sciendo, vol. 21(72), pages 139-166, February.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:9:y:2016:i:6:p:58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.