IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v7y2015i2p106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competitiveness in Michoacán: A Proposal for an International Positions in Agroindustrial Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Odette Delfin-Ortega
  • Joel Valencia

Abstract

The present research has as aim, to determine the ways in which are affected the quality, the price, the technological innovation, the environmental management, the market and the public agro industrial policies in the international competitiveness of the agro industrial sector of Michoacan. It was located 51 agroindustrial companies that are exporting. It was used as instrument of compilation of information a questionnaire composed of 80 items. Once the information was processed, it was determined the correlational analysis, linear regression and attempts at hypothesis. We can see with the results that the state is competitive in this sector and that the variables explain 97% of the competitiveness. The variable that determined the competitiveness with greater proportion was the technological innovation, so it requires public policies that strengthen this indicator and the sector can be even more competitive. In the other hand public polices in agro business got the lowest score and there is a gap in the implementation of programs and modernization in the sector that causes both nationally and internationally doesn´t be strong in the area of agribusiness Michoacan, so it must strengthen these policies from the national development plan.

Suggested Citation

  • Odette Delfin-Ortega & Joel Valencia, 2015. "Competitiveness in Michoacán: A Proposal for an International Positions in Agroindustrial Sector," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(2), pages 106-106, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:7:y:2015:i:2:p:106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/41976/24018
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/41976
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Qineti & M. Rajcaniova & E. Matejkova, 2009. "The competitiveness and comparative advantage of the Slovak and the EU agri-food trade with Russia and Ukraine," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(8), pages 375-383.
    2. Stefan Bojnec & Laure Latruffe, 2009. "Determinants of technical efficiency of Slovenian farms," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 117-124.
    3. Dini, Marco, 2010. "Competitividad, redes de empresas y cooperación empresarial," Gestión Pública 7328, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nyga-Łukaszewska Honorata & Napiórkowski Tomasz M., 2023. "Energy security as a source of international competitiveness in new EU member states," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 59(3), pages 209-224, September.
    2. Larue, Solène & Latruffe, Laure, 2009. "Agglomeration externalities and technical efficiency in French pig production," Working Papers 210403, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    3. Fogarasi, Jozsef & Latruffe, Laure, 2009. "Farm performance and support in Central and Western Europe: a comparison of Hungary and France," 83rd Annual Conference, March 30 - April 1, 2009, Dublin, Ireland 51053, Agricultural Economics Society.
    4. Laure Latruffe & Yann Desjeux, 2016. "Common Agricultural Policy support, technical efficiencyand productivity change in French agriculture," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 97(1), pages 15-28.
    5. Łukasz Kryszak & Marta Guth & Bazyli Czyżewski, 2021. "Determinants of farm profitability in the EU regions. Does farm size matter?," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(3), pages 90-100.
    6. Lajos Baráth & Imre Fertő & Štefan Bojnec, 2018. "Are farms in less favored areas less efficient?," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(1), pages 3-12, January.
    7. Karin Larsén, 2010. "Effects of machinery‐sharing arrangements on farm efficiency: evidence from Sweden," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(5), pages 497-506, September.
    8. Frýd, Lukáš & Sokol, Ondřej, 2021. "Relationships between technical efficiency and subsidies for Czech farms: A two-stage robust approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    9. Jerzy Marzec & Andrzej Pisulewski, 2021. "Measurement of technical efficiency in the case of heterogeneity of technologies used between firms - Based on evidence from Polish crop farms," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(4), pages 152-161.
    10. Minviel, Jean Joseph & De Witte, Kristof, 2017. "The influence of public subsidies on farm technical efficiency: A robust conditional nonparametric approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 1112-1120.
    11. Latruffe, Laure & Bravo-Ureta, Boris E. & Moreira, Victor H. & Desjeux, Yann & Dupraz, Pierre, 2011. "Productivity and Subsidies in European Union Countries: An Analysis for Dairy Farms Using Input Distance Frontiers," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114396, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Phatima MAMARDASHVILI & Dierk SCHMID, 2013. "Performance of Swiss dairy farms under provision of public goods," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(7), pages 300-314.
    13. Bright O. Asante & Renato A. Villano & Omphile Temoso, 2024. "Drivers of integrated crop–livestock farming system’s efficiency for smallholder farmers in the forest-savanna transition agro-ecological zone of Ghana," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 29429-29451, November.
    14. Bojnec, Stefan & Ferto, Imre, 2011. "Impact of Off-farm Income on Farm Efficiency in Slovenia," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114258, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Zhu, Xueqin & Demeter, Robert Milan & Oude Lansink, Alfons G.J.M., 2008. "Competitiveness of dairy farms in three countries: the role of CAP subsidies," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44143, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Kuhle Prudence Mnisi & Abdul Latif Alhassan, 2021. "Financial structure and cooperative efficiency: A pecking‐order evidence from sugarcane farmers in Eswatini," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(2), pages 261-281, June.
    17. Fertö, Imre, 2014. "The Structural Transformation in Central and Eastern European Agriculture," CEI Working Paper Series 2014-9, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    18. Tomislav Herceg & Iva Vuksanovic, 2017. "Technological progress in Croatian perennial agriculture," International Journal of Economic Sciences, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 6(1), pages 18-32, May.
    19. Bojnec, Stefan & Latruffe, Laure, 2007. "Farm Size and Efficiency: The Case of Slovenia," 100th Seminar, June 21-23, 2007, Novi Sad, Serbia and Montenegro 162391, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Jakub Staniszewski & Łukasz Kryszak, 2022. "Do Structures Matter in the Process of Sustainable Intensification? A Case Study of Agriculture in the European Union Countries," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, February.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:7:y:2015:i:2:p:106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.