IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v16y2024i9p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accuracy and Trade-Offs of Yield Estimation Techniques in Smallholder Farms in Sub-Saharan Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Mabel Nabateregga
  • Svein Øivind Sølberg

Abstract

Accurate measurement of crop yields in smallholder farming systems, especially in sub-Saharan Africa, is a pressing issue for agricultural research. Despite the widespread use of crop yield data in farm research and policymaking, there are significant challenges in generating valuable and accurate data regarding quality, quantity, and reliability, particularly in sub-Saharan African agriculture. The methodological choice of different yield estimation approaches and their suitability for context-specific settings is also not well understood. This review addresses these gaps by providing a comprehensive and qualitative overview of widely applied yield estimation approaches for grains in smallholder agriculture and analysing their trade-offs and suitability for context-specific farming systems. Additionally, key factors influencing the accuracy and variability of yield estimates in smallholder farms are discussed. By analysing these factors, this paper provides valuable insights for establishing benchmarks in crop production within smallholder farming systems, which is essential for making informed recommendations and decisions in agricultural research. The findings of this review are crucial for informing agricultural research and guiding decision-making, thereby contributing to the improvement of smallholder farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa.

Suggested Citation

  • Mabel Nabateregga & Svein Øivind Sølberg, 2024. "Accuracy and Trade-Offs of Yield Estimation Techniques in Smallholder Farms in Sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(9), pages 1-1, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/0/0/50517/54720
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/0/50517
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Calogero Carletto & Dean Jolliffe & Raka Banerjee, 2015. "From Tragedy to Renaissance: Improving Agricultural Data for Better Policies," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(2), pages 133-148, February.
    2. Justin Sandefur & Amanda Glassman, 2015. "The Political Economy of Bad Data: Evidence from African Survey and Administrative Statistics," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(2), pages 116-132, February.
    3. Ochieng, Hannington Odido & Ojiem, John & Otieno, Joyce, 2019. "Farmer versus Researcher data collection methodologies: Understanding variations and associated trade-offs," AfricArxiv ncw8a, Center for Open Science.
    4. Beegle, Kathleen & De Weerdt, Joachim & Friedman, Jed & Gibson, John, 2012. "Methods of household consumption measurement through surveys: Experimental results from Tanzania," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 3-18.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sam Desiere & Lotte Staelens & Marijke D’Haese, 2016. "When the Data Source Writes the Conclusion: Evaluating Agricultural Policies," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(9), pages 1372-1387, September.
    2. Dang, Hai-Anh H & Carletto, Calogero, 2022. "Recall Bias Revisited: Measure Farm Labor Using Mixed-Mode Surveys and Multiple Imputation," IZA Discussion Papers 14997, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Wollburg, Philip & Tiberti, Marco & Zezza, Alberto, 2021. "Recall length and measurement error in agricultural surveys," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    4. Jules Gazeaud & Victor Stephane, 2023. "Productive Workfare? Evidence from Ethiopia's Productive Safety Net Program," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(1), pages 265-290, January.
    5. Sebastian Heinen, 2022. "Rwanda’s Agricultural Transformation Revisited: Stagnating Food Production, Systematic Overestimation, and a Flawed Performance Contract System," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(10), pages 2044-2064, October.
    6. Conforti, Piero & Grünberger, Klaus & Troubat, Nathalie, 2017. "The impact of survey characteristics on the measurement of food consumption," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 43-52.
    7. Desiere, Sam, 2016. "The inverse productivity size relationship: can it be explained by systematic measurement error in self-reported production?," 2016 Fifth International Conference, September 23-26, 2016, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 246971, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    8. John L. Fiedler & Keith Lividini, 2017. "Monitoring population diet quality and nutrition status with household consumption and expenditure surveys: suggestions for a Bangladesh baseline," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(1), pages 63-88, February.
    9. Hammond, James & Fraval, Simon & van Etten, Jacob & Suchini, Jose Gabriel & Mercado, Leida & Pagella, Tim & Frelat, Romain & Lannerstad, Mats & Douxchamps, Sabine & Teufel, Nils & Valbuena, Diego & va, 2017. "The Rural Household Multi-Indicator Survey (RHoMIS) for rapid characterisation of households to inform climate smart agriculture interventions: Description and applications in East Africa and Central ," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 225-233.
    10. Fiedler, John L. & Mwangi, Dena M., 2016. "Improving household consumption and expenditure surveys’ food consumption metrics: Developing a strategic approach to the unfinished agenda:," IFPRI discussion papers 1570, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    11. Logan Cochrane & Yeshtila W. Bekele, 2018. "Contextualizing Narratives of Economic Growth and Navigating Problematic Data: Economic Trends in Ethiopia (1999–2017)," Economies, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Ameye, Hannah & De Weerdt, Joachim & Gibson, John, 2021. "Measuring macro- and micronutrient consumption in multi-purpose surveys: Evidence from a survey experiment in Tanzania," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    13. Jean-François Maystadt & Philip Verwimp, 2014. "Winners and Losers among a Refugee-Hosting Population," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 62(4), pages 769-809.
    14. Janz, Teresa & Augsburg, Britta & Gassmann, Franziska & Nimeh, Zina, 2023. "Leaving no one behind: Urban poverty traps in Sub-Saharan Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    15. Dang, Hai-Anh & Carletto, Calogero & Gourlay, Sydney & Abanokova, Kseniya, 2024. "Addressing Soil Quality Data Gaps with Imputation: Evidence from Ethiopia and Uganda," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1445, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    16. Bernard, Tanguy & Dercon, Stefan & Orkin, Kate & Schinaia, Giulio & Seyoum Taffesse, Alemayehu, 2023. "The Future in Mind: Aspirations and Long-term Outcomes in Rural Ethiopia," CEPR Discussion Papers 18492, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    17. Botchuin, Wilfred Catin, 2023. "Inclusive Growth Analysis: Evidence from Côte d’Ivoire," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 76(1), pages 91-134.
    18. Leandro De Magalhães & Dongya Koh & Raül Santaeulàlia-Llopis, 2016. "Consumption and Expenditure in Sub-Saharan Africa," Bristol Economics Discussion Papers 16/677, School of Economics, University of Bristol, UK, revised 07 Oct 2016.
    19. Dean Jolliffe & Espen Beer Prydz, 2016. "Estimating international poverty lines from comparable national thresholds," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 14(2), pages 185-198, June.
    20. Leandro DE MAGALHÃES & Dongya KOH & Räul SANTAEULILA-LLOPIS, 2019. "The Cost of Consumption Smoothing: Less Schooling and less Nutrition," JODE - Journal of Demographic Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 85(3), pages 181-208, September.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.