IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v12y2024i9p34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Irrigation Scheduling to Promote Corn Productivity in Central Alabama

Author

Listed:
  • Jose F. Da Cunha Leme Filho
  • Brenda V. Ortiz
  • Damianos Damianidis
  • Kipling S. Balkcom
  • Mark Dougherty
  • Thorsten Knappenberger

Abstract

Agriculture is the largest consumer of water in the United States. Results from previous studies have shown that it is possible to substantially reduce irrigation amounts and maintain corn yield. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of two irrigation scheduling methods for corn production in Alabama. Two irrigation scheduling methods evaluated were- a) Checkbook, which is one of the conventional methods used by farmers that is based on the soil water balance estimated using water lost by evapotranspiration and its replacement through rainfall or irrigation, and b) Sensor-based, which was based on soil matric potential values recorded by soil moisture tension sensors installed in the field. The experimental field was divided into two irrigation management zones (zone A and zone B) based on soil properties of each field. During the 2014 season in zone A, significant grain yield differences were observed between the two irrigation methods. The Checkbook plots exhibited greater yield than Sensor-based plots- 10181 kg ha-1 and 9696 kg ha-1, respectively. The greater yield on the Checkbook plots could be associated with higher irrigation rate applied, 148 mm more, compared with the Sensor-based plots. In zone B, there were no significant yield differences between both irrigation methods; however, Sensor-based plots out yielded Checkbook plots, with 9673 kg ha-1 and 9584 kg ha-1, respectively. Even though the irrigation amount applied in Checkbook located in zone B was higher, 102 mm more, there were no significant yield differences. Therefore, it suggests that the Sensor-based method was promissory irrigation scheduling strategy under the conditions of zone B. In 2015, there were no significant grain yield differences between zone A and zone B when the data from the Checkbook plots were analyzed. However, the Sensor-based treatment produced a statistically significant difference of grain yield of 13597 kg ha-1 in zone A and 11659 kg ha-1 in zone B, also both zones received the same amount of irrigation. Overall results of both growing seasons indicated that the use of the Sensor-based irrigation scheduling treatment resulted in similar values of total profit per hectare when compared to Checkbook method. The Sensor-based method seems a promising strategy that could result in water and financial savings, but more research is required.

Suggested Citation

  • Jose F. Da Cunha Leme Filho & Brenda V. Ortiz & Damianos Damianidis & Kipling S. Balkcom & Mark Dougherty & Thorsten Knappenberger, 2024. "Irrigation Scheduling to Promote Corn Productivity in Central Alabama," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(9), pages 1-34, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:12:y:2024:i:9:p:34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/0/0/43447/45569
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/0/43447
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Molden, D., 1997. "Accounting for water use and productivity," IWMI Books, Reports H021374, International Water Management Institute.
    2. Molden, David J., 1997. "Accounting for water use and productivity," IWMI Books, International Water Management Institute, number 113623.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mainuddin, M., 2010. "Water-use accounts in CPWF basins: simple water-use accounting of the Yellow River Basin," IWMI Working Papers H042849, International Water Management Institute.
    2. Zhao, Chuanyan & Nan, Zhongren & Cheng, Guodong, 2005. "Methods for estimating irrigation needs of spring wheat in the middle Heihe basin, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 54-70, July.
    3. Amarasinghe, Upali A. & Shah, Tushaar & Anand, B. K., 2008. "India’s water supply and demand from 2025-2050: business-as-usual scenario and issues," IWMI Conference Proceedings 235165, International Water Management Institute.
    4. Abdul Rehman & Luan Jingdong, 2017. "An econometric analysis of major Chinese food crops: An empirical study," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1323372-132, January.
    5. Huang, Feng & Li, Baoguo, 2010. "Assessing grain crop water productivity of China using a hydro-model-coupled-statistics approach: Part I: Method development and validation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(7), pages 1077-1092, July.
    6. Roost, N. & Cai, X.L. & Turral, H. & Molden, D. & Cui, Y.L., 2008. "Adapting to intersectoral transfers in the Zhanghe Irrigation System, China: Part II: Impacts of in-system storage on water balance and productivity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(6), pages 685-697, June.
    7. Bluemling, Bettina & Yang, Hong & Pahl-Wostl, Claudia, 2007. "Making water productivity operational--A concept of agricultural water productivity exemplified at a wheat-maize cropping pattern in the North China plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 91(1-3), pages 11-23, July.
    8. Fraga, H. & García de Cortázar Atauri, I. & Santos, J.A, 2018. "Viticultural irrigation demands under climate change scenarios in Portugal," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 66-74.
    9. Al-Muaini, Ahmed & Green, Steve & Dakheel, Abdullah & Abdullah, Al-Hareth & Sallam, Osama & Abou Dahr, Wasel Abdelwahid & Dixon, Steve & Kemp, Peter & Clothier, Brent, 2019. "Water requirements for irrigation with saline groundwater of three date-palm cultivars with different salt-tolerances in the hyper-arid United Arab Emirates," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 213-220.
    10. Amarasinghe, Upali A. & Sharma, Bharat R., 2009. "Water productivity of food grains in India: exploring potential improvements," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    11. Mohammad Alauddin & Upali A. Amarasinghe & Bharat R. Sharma, 2014. "Four decades of rice water productivity in Bangladesh: A spatio-temporal analysis of district level panel data," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 51-64.
    12. Eliav Shtull-Trauring & Asher Azenkot & Nirit Bernstein, 2022. "Translational Platform for Increasing Water Use Efficiency in Agriculture: Comparative Analysis of Plantation Crops," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(2), pages 571-587, January.
    13. Lee, Teang Shui & Haque, M. Aminul & Najim, M.M.M., 2005. "Scheduling the cropping calendar in wet-seeded rice schemes in Malaysia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 71-84, January.
    14. Barros, R. & Isidoro, D. & Aragüés, R., 2011. "Long-term water balances in La Violada irrigation district (Spain): I. Sequential assessment and minimization of closing errors," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 35-45.
    15. Kirby, M., 2010. "Water-use accounts in CPWF basins: simple water-use accounting of the Karkheh Basin," IWMI Working Papers H042846, International Water Management Institute.
    16. Zamani, Omid & Azadi, Hossein & Mortazavi, Seyed Abolghasem & Balali, Hamid & Moghaddam, Saghi Movahhed & Jurik, Lubos, 2021. "The impact of water-pricing policies on water productivity: Evidence of agriculture sector in Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    17. Palanisami, Kuppannan & Senthilvel, S. & Ramesh, T., 2009. "Water productivity at different scales under canal, tank and well irrigation systems," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    18. Yau, Sui-Kwong & Nimah, Musa & Farran, Mohamad, 2011. "Early sowing and irrigation to increase barley yields and water use efficiency in Mediterranean conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(12), pages 1776-1781, October.
    19. Kirby, M., 2010. "Water-use accounts in CPWF basins: simple water-use accounting of the Mekong Basin," IWMI Working Papers H042840, International Water Management Institute.
    20. Vyshpolsky, F. & Mukhamedjanov, K. & Bekbaev, U. & Ibatullin, S. & Yuldashev, T. & Noble, A.D. & Mirzabaev, A. & Aw-Hassan, A. & Qadir, M., 2010. "Optimizing the rate and timing of phosphogypsum application to magnesium-affected soils for crop yield and water productivity enhancement," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(9), pages 1277-1286, September.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:12:y:2024:i:9:p:34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.