IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v11y2024i6p86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bee Community in Open-Field Tomato Crop and Pollination Effect by Wild Bees on the Fruit Production

Author

Listed:
  • Fernando M. Barbosa
  • José C. Zanuncio
  • Lucio Antônio de O. Campos

Abstract

Bees are important components of the pollinator community of most ecosystems, contributing to the production of crops. The knowledge on the bees’fauna associated with crops and the pollination effect performed by bees on the fruit production and quality is important to the design, planning, and execution of projects to conserve pollinator populations in agricultural systems. The objectives of this work were to identify bees visiting tomato flowers, verify the climate variable and the day period on bee forage activity, and to evaluate the fruit production with different pollination types. The study was conducted from July 2015 to September 2017 in the Norte de Minas and Zona da Mata region, Minas Gerais state, Brazil. Eleven tomato fields were sampled. Fruit set and fruit quality from different pollination methods was evaluated with the following treatments- single visit (SV), open pollination (OP), mechanical pollination (MP) and control (self-pollination) (C). A total of 1,998 individuals distributed in Andrenidae, Apidae, and Halictidae families were collected, with greater abundance and species richness for Apidae. The tomato fruit mass was higher in the OP than in the SV and MP, which differed from the C. The high abundance of Exomalopsis analis and its occurrence in all fields, allied to its sonication behavior, indicate that this species is an important pollinator of the tomato. The tomato does not depend exclusively on bee pollination, but this improves its yield and quality, especially when performed by individuals of different species.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernando M. Barbosa & José C. Zanuncio & Lucio Antônio de O. Campos, 2024. "Bee Community in Open-Field Tomato Crop and Pollination Effect by Wild Bees on the Fruit Production," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(6), pages 1-86, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:11:y:2024:i:6:p:86
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/0/0/39244/40066
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/0/39244
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gallai, Nicola & Salles, Jean-Michel & Settele, Josef & Vaissière, Bernard E., 2009. "Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 810-821, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sare Asli & Riad Abu-Alhiga & Shafea Algmal & Muhamad Hugerat, 2022. "Teaching and Learning about Bee Extinction through Project-Based Learning (PBL): Its Impact on the Classroom Climate (CL) among Eighth Grader Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Barbara Zajdel & Paweł Migdał & Agnieszka Murawska & Agata Jojczyk & Ewelina Berbeć & Kornelia Kucharska & Jakub Gąbka, 2023. "Concentration of Heavy Metals in Pollen and Bees Osmia bicornis L. in Three Different Habitats in the Łowicz District in Central Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Balzan, Mario V & Caruana, Julio & Zammit, Annrica, 2018. "Assessing the capacity and flow of ecosystem services in multifunctional landscapes: Evidence of a rural-urban gradient in a Mediterranean small island state," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 711-725.
    4. Smith, Helen F. & Sullivan, Caroline A., 2014. "Ecosystem services within agricultural landscapes—Farmers' perceptions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 72-80.
    5. Panchalingam, Thadchaigeni & Jones Ritten, Chian & Shogren, Jason F. & Ehmke, Mariah D. & Bastian, Christopher T. & Parkhurst, Gregory M., 2019. "Adding realism to the Agglomeration Bonus: How endogenous land returns affect habitat fragmentation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Kathrin Stenchly & Marc Victor Hansen & Katharina Stein & Andreas Buerkert & Wilhelm Loewenstein, 2018. "Income Vulnerability of West African Farming Households to Losses in Pollination Services: A Case Study from Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, November.
    7. Grazia Zulian & Joachim Maes & Maria Luisa Paracchini, 2013. "Linking Land Cover Data and Crop Yields for Mapping and Assessment of Pollination Services in Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-21, September.
    8. Paul L. G. Vlek & Asia Khamzina & Hossein Azadi & Anik Bhaduri & Luna Bharati & Ademola Braimoh & Christopher Martius & Terry Sunderland & Fatemeh Taheri, 2017. "Trade-Offs in Multi-Purpose Land Use under Land Degradation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, November.
    9. Vallecillo, Sara & La Notte, Alessandra & Zulian, Grazia & Ferrini, Silvia & Maes, Joachim, 2019. "Ecosystem services accounts: Valuing the actual flow of nature-based recreation from ecosystems to people," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 392(C), pages 196-211.
    10. Maria Rosa Trovato & Paolo Micalizzi & Salvatore Giuffrida, 2021. "Assessment of Landscape Co-Benefits in Natura 2000 Site Management Plans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-38, May.
    11. Akintade, Taiwo Folajimi, 2024. "Factors Influencing Beekeeping Adaptation Strategy to Climate Change in Ondo State, Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(8), pages 3321-3328, August.
    12. Hupfel, Simon & Missemer, Antoine, 2023. "Decommodifying wealth: Lauderdale and ecological economics beyond the Lauderdale paradox," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    13. Ratamäki, Outi. & Jokinen, Pekka. & Sorensen, Peter. & Breeze, Tom. & Potts, Simon., 2015. "A multilevel analysis on pollination-related policies," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 133-143.
    14. Cristiano Ziegler & Tiago Sinigaglia & Mario Eduardo Santos Martins & Adriano Mendonça Souza, 2021. "Technological Advances to Reduce Apis mellifera Mortality: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-13, July.
    15. Lippert, Christian & Feuerbacher, Arndt & Narjes, Manuel, 2021. "Revisiting the economic valuation of agricultural losses due to large-scale changes in pollinator populations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    16. Morgane Barbet-Massin & Jean-Michel Salles & Franck Courchamp, 2020. "The economic cost of control of the invasive yellow-legged Asian hornet," Post-Print hal-02548072, HAL.
    17. Kontogianni, Areti & Luck, Gary W. & Skourtos, Michalis, 2010. "Valuing ecosystem services on the basis of service-providing units: A potential approach to address the 'endpoint problem' and improve stated preference methods," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 1479-1487, May.
    18. Peter G. Kevan & Randolf Menzel, 2012. "The plight of pollination and the interface of neurobiology, ecology and food security," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 300-310, September.
    19. Rucker, Randal R. & Thurman, Walter N. & Burgett, Michael, 2016. "Colony Collapse and the Economic Consequences of Bee Disease: Adaptation to Environmental Change," CEnREP Working Papers 264976, North Carolina State University, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    20. Luciano Pilati & Vasco Boatto, 2014. "Jointness in Sites: The Case of Migratory Beekeeping," DEM Discussion Papers 2014/10, Department of Economics and Management.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:11:y:2024:i:6:p:86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.