IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijefaa/v12y2021i12p14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Prediction Error of the Chain Ladder Method (With Application to Real Data)

Author

Listed:
  • Afaf Antar Zohry
  • Mostafa Abdelghany Ahmed

Abstract

The chain ladder method is the most widely used method of estimating claims reserves due to its simplicity and ease of application. It is very important to know the accuracy of the resulting estimates. Murphy presented a recursive model to estimate the standard error of claims reserves estimates, in line with the solvency ii requirements as a new regulatory framework adjusted according to risk, which requires the necessity to estimate the error and uncertainty of the claims reserving estimates. In Murphy's model, the mean square error (MSE) is analyzed into its components- variance and bias. In this paper, the recursive model of Murphy was used to estimate the prediction error in claims reserves estimates of General Accident & Miscellaneous Insurance in one of the Egyptian insurance companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Afaf Antar Zohry & Mostafa Abdelghany Ahmed, 2021. "The Prediction Error of the Chain Ladder Method (With Application to Real Data)," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:12:y:2021:i:12:p:14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/download/0/0/44126/46460
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/view/0/44126
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mario V. Wuthrich & Michael Merz, 2015. "Stochastic Claims Reserving Manual: Advances in Dynamic Modeling," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 15-34, Swiss Finance Institute.
    2. Paulo J. R. Pinheiro & João Manuel Andrade e Silva & Maria De Lourdes Centeno, 2003. "Bootstrap Methodology in Claim Reserving," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 70(4), pages 701-714, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gian Paolo Clemente & Nino Savelli & Diego Zappa, 2019. "Modelling Outstanding Claims with Mixed Compound Processes in Insurance," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(3), pages 123-138, March.
    2. Crevecoeur, Jonas & Antonio, Katrien & Verbelen, Roel, 2019. "Modeling the number of hidden events subject to observation delay," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 930-944.
    3. Andreas Frohlich & Annegret Weng, 2016. "Parameter uncertainty and reserve risk under Solvency II," Papers 1612.03066, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2017.
    4. Álvarez-Jareño, José Antonio & Coll-Serrano, Vicente, 2012. "Estimación de reservas en una compañía aseguradora. Una aplicación en Excel del método Chain-Ladder y Bootstrap || Estimating the Reserves in Insurance Companies: An Excel Application of the Chain-Lad," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 14(1), pages 124-136, December.
    5. Steinmetz, Julia & Jentsch, Carsten, 2024. "Bootstrap consistency for the Mack bootstrap," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 83-121.
    6. Liivika Tee & Meelis Käärik & Rauno Viin, 2017. "On Comparison of Stochastic Reserving Methods with Bootstrapping," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-21, January.
    7. J. Harnau & B. Nielsen, 2017. "Over-dispersed age-period-cohort models," Economics Papers 2017-W06, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    8. Stefano Cavastracci Strascia & Agostino Tripodi, 2018. "Overdispersed-Poisson Model in Claims Reserving: Closed Tool for One-Year Volatility in GLM Framework," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-24, December.
    9. Badescu, Andrei L. & Lin, X. Sheldon & Tang, Dameng, 2016. "A marked Cox model for the number of IBNR claims: Theory," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 29-37.
    10. Richard J. Verrall & Mario V. Wüthrich, 2016. "Understanding Reporting Delay in General Insurance," Risks, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-36, July.
    11. Peters, Gareth W. & Targino, Rodrigo S. & Wüthrich, Mario V., 2017. "Full Bayesian analysis of claims reserving uncertainty," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 41-53.
    12. Crevecoeur, Jonas & Robben, Jens & Antonio, Katrien, 2022. "A hierarchical reserving model for reported non-life insurance claims," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 158-184.
    13. Gareth W. Peters & Mario V. Wuthrich & Pavel V. Shevchenko, 2010. "Chain ladder method: Bayesian bootstrap versus classical bootstrap," Papers 1004.2548, arXiv.org.
    14. Mathias Lindholm & Ronald Richman & Andreas Tsanakas & Mario V. Wuthrich, 2022. "A Discussion of Discrimination and Fairness in Insurance Pricing," Papers 2209.00858, arXiv.org.
    15. Klaus Schmidt, 2012. "Loss prediction based on run-off triangles," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 96(2), pages 265-310, June.
    16. Wahl, Felix & Lindholm, Mathias & Verrall, Richard, 2019. "The collective reserving model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 34-50.
    17. László Martinek, 2019. "Analysis of Stochastic Reserving Models By Means of NAIC Claims Data," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-27, June.
    18. Gao, Guangyuan & Meng, Shengwang & Shi, Yanlin, 2021. "Dispersion modelling of outstanding claims with double Poisson regression models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 572-586.
    19. Peters, Gareth W. & Wüthrich, Mario V. & Shevchenko, Pavel V., 2010. "Chain ladder method: Bayesian bootstrap versus classical bootstrap," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 36-51, August.
    20. Fröhlich, Andreas & Weng, Annegret, 2018. "Parameter uncertainty and reserve risk under Solvency II," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 130-141.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:12:y:2021:i:12:p:14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.