IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijbmjn/v17y2023i10p34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Everyone Does Something Else Right: Underpinning Knowledge Sharing in Organizational Transformations

Author

Listed:
  • Jan van de Poll
  • Yang Yong
  • Li Chen

Abstract

In organizational transformations, it’s usually the entire organization that has to change. Employee polls can be used to get an objective view of the state of the organization and help give managers and employees something back. Employee polls garner the crowd's wisdom, gauge the present energy, and help with strategic decision-making. Only a few studies have analyzed the translation of the overall organizational strategy into personalized advice for every manager and employee- What to improve, how to do it (best practices), and who can help (knowledge sharing). This article aims to address this research gap by using some latest developments in artificial intelligence. We quantified the possibilities for knowledge sharing in 325 organizational transformations covering close to 2,000 teams and over 20,000 employees. Roughly 96% of employees scored at least average on one or more parts of the transformation ‘measuring rod.’ And for 99% of these parts, it made sense to share knowledge among the employee polls’ respondents. Potentially, an organization might score close to 10 out of 10; it’s just a matter of connecting the dots. In summary- everyone does something else right.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan van de Poll & Yang Yong & Li Chen, 2023. "Everyone Does Something Else Right: Underpinning Knowledge Sharing in Organizational Transformations," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(10), pages 1-34, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:17:y:2023:i:10:p:34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/download/0/0/47735/51215
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/view/0/47735
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahrens, Thomas & Chapman, Christopher S., 2006. "Doing qualitative field research in management accounting: Positioning data to contribute to theory," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 819-841, November.
    2. Ian Diamond & John McDonald & Iqbal Shah, 1986. "Proportional hazards models for current status data: Application to the study of differentials in age at weaning in Pakistan," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 23(4), pages 607-620, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ilse Svensson de Jong, 2021. "When Wrong Is Right: Leaving Room for Error in Innovation Measurement," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Dambrin, Claire & Lambert, Caroline, 2012. "Who is she and who are we? A reflexive journey in research into the rarity of women in the highest ranks of accountancy," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 1-16.
    3. Lorino, Philippe & Mourey, Damien & Schmidt, Géraldine, 2017. "Goffman's theory of frames and situated meaning-making in performance reviews. The case of a category management approach in the French retail sector," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 32-49.
    4. Walid Cheffi, 2008. "Etude Des Roles De La Comptabilite De Gestion Pour Les Managers : Le Cas D'Un Grand Groupe Automobile," Post-Print halshs-00522472, HAL.
    5. Matthew Egan, 2015. "Driving Water Management Change Where Economic Incentive is Limited," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(1), pages 73-90, November.
    6. Gérald Naro & Denis Travaillé, 2010. "Construire les stratégies avec le Balanced Scorecard:vers une approche interactive du modèle de Kaplan et Norton," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 13(2), pages 33-66., June.
    7. Graaf, Johan & Kraus, Kalle & Strömsten, Torkel, 2022. "The problematics of financialization – On the important (but neglected) horizontal axis of organizational action," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    8. Chapman, Christopher S., 2018. "Interpretive methodological expertise and editorial board composition," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 47-51.
    9. Giuliani, Marco & Skoog, Matti, 2020. "Making sense of the temporal dimension of intellectual capital: A critical case study," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    10. Lai Ken Tan & Matthew Egan, 2018. "The Public Accountability Value of a Triple Bottom Line Approach to Performance Reporting in the Water Sector," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(2), pages 235-250, June.
    11. Allan Hansen, 2011. "Relating performative and ostensive management accounting research," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(2), pages 108-138, June.
    12. Vassili Joannides & Danture Wickramasinghe & Nicolas Berland, 2012. "Critiques On Gray-Hofstede'S Model: What Impact On Cross-Cultural Accounting Research?," Post-Print hal-00690933, HAL.
    13. Vassili Joannides & Danture Wickramasinghe & Nicolas Berland, 2012. "Critiques on gray-hofstede’s model: what impact on cross-cultural accounting research?," Post-Print hal-01661667, HAL.
    14. Sarah Lauwo, 2018. "Challenging Masculinity in CSR Disclosures: Silencing of Women’s Voices in Tanzania’s Mining Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 689-706, May.
    15. Goretzki, Lukas & Messner, Martin, 2019. "Backstage and frontstage interactions in management accountants' identity work," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1-20.
    16. Vassili Joannides & Danture Wickramasinghe & Nicolas Berland, 2012. "Critiques on gray-hofstede’s model: what impact on cross-cultural accounting research?," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-01661667, HAL.
    17. Jørgensen, Brian & Messner, Martin, 2010. "Accounting and strategising: A case study from new product development," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 184-204, February.
    18. Ali M. Elharidy & Brian Nicholson & Robert W. Scapens, 2008. "Using grounded theory in interpretive management accounting research," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(2), pages 139-155, June.
    19. Carr, Michelle & Beck, Matthias, 2022. "Accounting practices and professional power dynamics during a crisis," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(3).
    20. Fiona Steele & Ian Diamond & Duolao Wang, 1996. "The determinants of the duration of contraceptive use in China: A multilevel multinomial discrete-hazards mdeling approach," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 33(1), pages 12-23, February.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:17:y:2023:i:10:p:34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.