IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijbmjn/v14y2021i9p150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing and Validating an Organizational Forgiveness Measure: An Exploratory Factor Analysis Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Parizad Khezri

Abstract

The purpose of this validation study was to develop and validate an organizational forgiveness measure. Convenient sampling was employed to recruit 148 participants from among the staff of Iran Rehabilitation Organization. A Likert scale questionnaire consisting of 21 statements on five subscales, namely, ‘emotional composure’, ‘empathy with the perpetrator’, ‘rebuilding the broken relationship’, ‘willingness to forgive’, ‘satisfaction from forgiving’, and ‘better understanding’ was developed by the researcher. The questionnaire was completed by the participants after they were instructed as to how to do it. Exploratory factor analysis was used to validate the questionnaire. The results showed that the questionnaire was a valid instrument to measure degree of organizational forgiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Parizad Khezri, 2021. "Developing and Validating an Organizational Forgiveness Measure: An Exploratory Factor Analysis Approach," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(9), pages 150-150, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/download/0/0/40349/41507
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/view/0/40349
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johannes G. Reiter & Christian Hilbe & David G. Rand & Krishnendu Chatterjee & Martin A. Nowak, 2018. "Crosstalk in concurrent repeated games impedes direct reciprocity and requires stronger levels of forgiveness," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-8, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Quan, Ji & Chen, Xinyue & Wang, Xianjia, 2024. "Repeated prisoner's dilemma games in multi-player structured populations with crosstalk," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 473(C).
    2. Deming Mao & Xiaoyu Li & Dejun Mu & Dujuan Liu & Chen Chu, 2021. "Separated interactive behaviors promote cooperation in the spatial prisoner’s dilemma game," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 94(7), pages 1-9, July.
    3. Cameron Harwick, 2020. "Inside and Outside Perspectives on Institutions: An Economic Theory of the Noble Lie," Journal of Contextual Economics (JCE) – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 140(1), pages 3-30.
    4. Li, Wen-Jing & Chen, Zhi & Jin, Ke-Zhong & Wang, Jun & Yuan, Lin & Gu, Changgui & Jiang, Luo-Luo & Perc, Matjaž, 2022. "Options for mobility and network reciprocity to jointly yield robust cooperation in social dilemmas," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 435(C).
    5. Ma, Xiaojian & Quan, Ji & Wang, Xianjia, 2023. "Evolution of cooperation with nonlinear environment feedback in repeated public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 452(C).
    6. Sun, Chengbin & Luo, Chao, 2020. "Co-evolution of influence-based preferential selection and limited resource with multi-games on interdependent networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 374(C).
    7. Peter S. Park & Martin A. Nowak & Christian Hilbe, 2022. "Cooperation in alternating interactions with memory constraints," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.