IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijbmjn/v14y2021i4p107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assets Utilization and Performance of Manufacturing Firms in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • G. T. Akinleye
  • Adesina Olufemi Dadepo

Abstract

This study examined the effect of assets utilization on performance of selected manufacturing firms in Nigeria. Secondary data were collected from the annual report and accounts of the ten selected quoted firms for a period of five years spanning from 2012 to 2016. Data collected were analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation and regression analyses. The empirical results revealed that asset turnover(ATR) has positive and significant effect on return on assets (ROA) of the selected manufacturing firms as confirmed by the coefficient and probability value of 0.235999(p=0.0000). Current assets ratio also has positive and significant effect on return on assets with the coefficient of 0.109040 (p=0.0035) while debt assets ratio has negative but insignificant effect on return on assets. The overall coefficient of determination (R2)of 0.84951showed that about 85 % of the total variation in the ROA is explained by asset turnover (ATR), current ratio (CUR) and debt-assets ratio (DAR). The study concluded that assets utilization has positive and significant effect on the performance of manufacturing firms in Nigeria and therefore recommended that attention should be purposely paid to optimum asset utilization in the manufacturing firms in Nigeria.

Suggested Citation

  • G. T. Akinleye & Adesina Olufemi Dadepo, 2021. "Assets Utilization and Performance of Manufacturing Firms in Nigeria," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(4), pages 107-107, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:14:y:2021:i:4:p:107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/download/0/0/38777/39446
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/view/0/38777
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    2. R. Edward Freeman & Andrew C. Wicks & Bidhan Parmar, 2004. "Stakeholder Theory and “The Corporate Objective Revisited”," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 364-369, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jongmoo Jay Choi & Hoje Jo & Jimi Kim & Moo Sung Kim, 2018. "Business Groups and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 931-954, December.
    2. Jianzhuang Zheng & Muhammad Usman Khurram & Lifeng Chen, 2022. "Can Green Innovation Affect ESG Ratings and Financial Performance? Evidence from Chinese GEM Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-32, July.
    3. Chakraborty, Atreya & Gao, Lucia Silva & Sheikh, Shahbaz, 2019. "Managerial risk taking incentives, corporate social responsibility and firm risk," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 58-72.
    4. Ayman Hassan Bazhair & Mohammed Naif Alshareef, 2022. "Dynamic relationship between ownership structure and financial performance: a Saudi experience," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 2098636-209, December.
    5. Udeh, Francis Nnoli & Abiahu, Mary-Fidelis Chidoziem & Tambou, Liberty Ejomafuvwe, 2017. "Impact of Corporate Governance on Firms Financial Performance: A Study of Quoted Banks in Nigeria," MPRA Paper 94923, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 07 Jul 2019.
    6. Christof Miska & Mark E. Mendenhall, 2018. "Responsible Leadership: A Mapping of Extant Research and Future Directions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 117-134, March.
    7. Nirmala Devi Mohanadas, 2019. "A Theoretical Review on Corporate Tax Avoidance: Shareholder Approach versus Stakeholder Approach," GATR Journals jfbr160, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    8. Naeem Tabassum & Satwinder Singh, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Organisational Performance," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-48527-6, January.
    9. Sheikh, Shahbaz, 2018. "Is corporate social responsibility a value-increasing investment? Evidence from antitakeover provisions," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-12.
    10. Kevin Levillain & Blanche Segrestin, 2019. "From primacy to purpose commitment: How emerging profit-with-purpose corporations open new corporate governance avenues," Post-Print hal-02290622, HAL.
    11. S. M. Kalbin Salema, 2023. "Ownership Structure, Board Characteristics and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(3), pages 1-35, March.
    12. Thomas J. Chemmanur & Dimitrios Gounopoulos & Panagiotis Koutroumpis & Yu Zhang, 2022. "CSR and Firm Survival: Evidence from the Climate and Pandemic Crises," Working Papers 935, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    13. John R. Boatright, 2006. "What's Wrong—and What's Right— with Stakeholder Management," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 22(Spring 20), pages 106-130.
    14. Victoria Hurth & Charles Ebert & Jaideep Prabhu, 2018. "Organisational purpose: the construct and its antecedents and consequences," Working Papers 201802, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    15. Michael Pirson & Mario Vázquez-Maguirre & Canan Corus & Erica Steckler & Andrew Wicks, 2019. "Dignity and the Process of Social Innovation: Lessons from Social Entrepreneurship and Transformative Services for Humanistic Management," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 125-153, December.
    16. Martin, Graeme & Farndale, Elaine & Paauwe, Jaap & Stiles, Philip G., 2016. "Corporate governance and strategic human resource management: Four archetypes and proposals for a new approach to corporate sustainability," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 22-35.
    17. Leung, Woon Sau & Song, Wei & Chen, Jie, 2019. "Does bank stakeholder orientation enhance financial stability?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 38-63.
    18. Hsueh-Li HUANG & Lien-Wen LIANG & Yi-Ching SU CHU, 2022. "The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance on Bank Efficiency. Comparative Analysis of Consolidated and Nonconsolidated Banks," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(3), pages 105-127, October.
    19. Woon Sau Leung & Wei Song & Jie Chen, 2018. "Does Bank Stakeholder Orientation Enhance Financial Stability? Evidence from a Natural Experiment," Working Papers 2018-14, Swansea University, School of Management.
    20. Buchanan, Bonnie G. & Cao, Cathy Xuying & Wang, Shuhui, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility and inside debt: The long game," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:14:y:2021:i:4:p:107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.