IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijbmjn/v13y2021i12p203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of the Main ERM Frameworks: How Limitations and Weaknesses can be Overcome Implementing IT Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Michele Rubino

Abstract

The significance of the Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) is widely recognized by the academic and professional literature. Knowledge and management of business risks are an integral part of every successful business strategy and are increasingly becoming a primary factor of competitiveness. Although several risk management frameworks have been published and updated over time, these standards still have limitations. The advent of IT helped companies to better manage business risks. The rise of the IT governance has improved the management and the monitoring of business processes as well as the implementation of policies and procedures. The aim of this paper is twofold. First, a comparative analysis of the main risk management frameworks was carried out, highlighting their limits and weaknesses. Second, it was highlighted how the IT governance and the related frameworks as COBIT could contribute to a better implementation of the risk management process that allows to overcome the limitations of the examined standards.The significance of the Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) is widely recognized by the academic and professional literature. Knowledge and management of business risks are an integral part of every successful business strategy and are increasingly becoming a primary factor of competitiveness. Although several risk management frameworks have been published and updated over time, these standards still have limitations. The advent of IT helped companies to better manage business risks. The rise of the IT governance has improved the management and the monitoring of business processes as well as the implementation of policies and procedures. The aim of this paper is twofold. First, a comparative analysis of the main risk management frameworks was carried out, highlighting their limits and weaknesses. Second, it was highlighted how the IT governance and the related frameworks as COBIT could contribute to a better implementation of the risk management process that allows to overcome the limitations of the examined standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Michele Rubino, 2021. "A Comparison of the Main ERM Frameworks: How Limitations and Weaknesses can be Overcome Implementing IT Governance," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(12), pages 203-203, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/download/0/0/37498/37820
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/view/0/37498
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Granlund, Markus, 2011. "Extending AIS research to management accounting and control issues: A research note," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 3-19.
    2. Chapman, Christopher S., 2005. "Not because they are new: Developing the contribution of enterprise resource planning systems to management control research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(7-8), pages 685-689.
    3. Power, Michael, 2009. "The risk management of nothing," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(6-7), pages 849-855, August.
    4. Michele Rubino & Filippo Vitolla, 2014. "Internal control over financial reporting: opportunities using the COBIT framework," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 29(8), pages 736-771, August.
    5. Michele Rubino & Filippo Vitolla & Antonello Garzoni, 2017. "How IT controls improve the control environment," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 40(2), pages 218-234, February.
    6. Hirshleifer, David & Teoh, Siew Hong, 2003. "Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1-3), pages 337-386, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lauri Lepistö, 2014. "Taking information technology seriously: on the legitimating discourses of enterprise resource planning system adoption," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 25(3), pages 193-219, December.
    2. Taipaleenmäki, Jani & Ikäheimo, Seppo, 2013. "On the convergence of management accounting and financial accounting – the role of information technology in accounting change," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 321-348.
    3. Ruivo, Pedro & Oliveira, Tiago & Neto, Miguel, 2014. "Examine ERP post-implementation stages of use and value: Empirical evidence from Portuguese SMEs," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 166-184.
    4. Teittinen, Henri & Pellinen, Jukka & Järvenpää, Marko, 2013. "ERP in action — Challenges and benefits for management control in SME context," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 278-296.
    5. Hemling, Lars & Plesner Rossing, Jacob Christian & Hoffjan, Andreas, 2022. "The use of information technology for international transfer pricing in multinational enterprises," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    6. Reinking, Jeff & Arnold, Vicky & Sutton, Steve G., 2020. "Synthesizing enterprise data to strategically align performance: The intentionality of strategy surrogation," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    7. Liew, Angela, 2015. "The use of technology-structured management controls: changes in senior management’s decision-making behaviours," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 37-64.
    8. Guénin-Paracini, Henri & Malsch, Bertrand & Paillé, Anne Marché, 2014. "Fear and risk in the audit process," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 264-288.
    9. Stephen A. Hillegeist & James P. Kavourakis & Matthew Pinnuck, 2023. "The association between quarter length, forecast errors, and firms’ voluntary disclosures," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(2), pages 1885-1918, June.
    10. Florian Meier, 2020. "The Age of Cheap Money and Passive Investing: Are Pro Forma Earnings Value Relevant?," Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 9(2), pages 1-1.
    11. Sylvie Héroux & Mélanie Roussy, 2020. "Three cases of compliance with governance regulation: an organizational learning perspective," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(2), pages 449-479, June.
    12. Pinto, Inês & Morais, Ana Isabel & Quick, Reiner, 2020. "The impact of the precision of accounting standards on the expanded auditor’s report in the European Union," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    13. Turan G. Bali & Robert F. Engle & Yi Tang, 2017. "Dynamic Conditional Beta Is Alive and Well in the Cross Section of Daily Stock Returns," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(11), pages 3760-3779, November.
    14. Mei Luo & Shuai Shao & Frank Zhang, 2018. "Does financial reporting above or below operating income matter to firms and investors? The case of investment income in China," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1754-1790, December.
    15. Bertrand, Jérémie & Burietz, Aurore, 2023. "(Loan) price and (loan officer) prejudice," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 26-42.
    16. Umar, Tarik, 2022. "Complexity aversion when SeekingAlpha," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(2).
    17. Po-Hsuan Hsu & Dongmei Li & Qin Li & Siew Hong Teoh & Kevin Tseng, 2022. "Valuation of New Trademarks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 257-279, January.
    18. Fischer, Michael Daniel & Ferlie, Ewan, 2013. "Resisting hybridisation between modes of clinical risk management: Contradiction, contest, and the production of intractable conflict," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 30-49.
    19. Wang, Weimin & (Frank) Wang, Xu, 2014. "Predicting earnings in a poor information environment," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 46-58.
    20. Narongdech Thakerngkiat & Hung T. Nguyen & Nhut H. Nguyen & Nuttawat Visaltanachoti, 2021. "Do accounting information and market environment matter for cross‐asset predictability?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(3), pages 4389-4434, September.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.