IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ibrjnl/v14y2021i2p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Organizational Politics, Leadership Style and Resilience: How Do They Relate to OCB, If at All?

Author

Listed:
  • Aharon Tziner
  • Amos Drory
  • Nir Shilan

Abstract

The present study examines the relationship between Perceived Organizational Politics (POP) and self-reported Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) focusing on three mediating variables, transactional leadership, transformational leadership, and resilience. 210 employees from a variety of organizations and backgrounds completed a questionnaire containing standard measures of the study variables. Analysis of the data using Amos statistical package shows that OCB is significantly associated with POP, and that leadership styles and resilience significantly mediate this association. The results are discussed in terms of employees’ motivation to react to lack of perceived clarity, justice and fairness by enhancing their self-report of OCB engagement. Further research is needed to better understand the meaning of self-reported OCB.

Suggested Citation

  • Aharon Tziner & Amos Drory & Nir Shilan, 2021. "Perceived Organizational Politics, Leadership Style and Resilience: How Do They Relate to OCB, If at All?," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(2), pages 1-1, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/download/0/0/44552/47071
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/view/0/44552
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lior Oren & Aharon Tziner & Yulia Nahshon & Gil Sharoni, 2013. "Relations between OCBs, organizational justice, work motivation and self-efficacy," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(34), pages 505-517, June.
    2. Or Shkoler & Aharon Tziner, 2020. "Leadership Styles as Predictors of Work Attitudes: A Moderated–Mediation Link," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(53), pages 164-164, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Onete Cristian Bogdan & Chiţa Sandra Diana & Albăstroiu Irina & Andrei Teodora Liliana, 2021. "Leading teams in virtual environment during COVID-19 crisis," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 328-337, December.
    2. Marcela-Sefora Nemteanu & Dan-Cristian Dabija, 2020. "The Influence of Heavy Work Investment on Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention in Romania," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(Special 1), pages 993-993, November.
    3. Ana Nesic & Slavica Mitrovic Veljkovic, & Maja Mesko & Tine Bertoncel, 2020. "Correlation of Trust and Work Engagement: a Modern Organizational Approach," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(Special 1), pages 1283-1283, November.
    4. David Sloan & Alan C. Mikkelson & Sebastian Vaduva, 2020. "The Importance of Mentorship in Diminishing Workaholism 1030 and Increasing Heavy Work Investment: Evidence from the United States," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(Special 1), pages 1030-1030, November.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.