IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/gjhsjl/v12y2020i1p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health Psychological Case Study of High Intensity, Low Impact, Physical Training Program

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen D. Edwards

Abstract

This case study reports on the health psychological evaluation of an integrated, high intensity, lo impact, physical training program for a 31 year old, male accountancy teacher. High intensity components consisted of running, cycling and the Canadian Airforce 5BX program. Low impact components comprised walking and Chi-gung inspired Pilates. Squash and swimming were also occasional activities. The pre-test and post-test, process and outcome evaluative, research design included qualitative and quantitative components in the form of psychometric testing, diarizing of physical activity, experiential descriptions of the various components and program outcome evaluation. Quantitative findings indicated significant improvements in psychophysiological coherence, mood, resilience and general health. Qualitative experiential descriptions provided further evidence of health psychological growth. Integrative findings emphasize the importance of physical training programs based on client individual preferences. The client reported that he found the program to be enjoyable, flexible, invigorating and readily adaptable to suit the needs of various individuals who face time and space constraints in their daily lives. With minimal innovation for greater complexity, control and/or challenges, such programs may readily yield enjoyable flow experiences.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen D. Edwards, 2020. "Health Psychological Case Study of High Intensity, Low Impact, Physical Training Program," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(1), pages 1-1, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/download/0/0/41623/43184
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/0/41623
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hans-Gerd Ridder, 2017. "The theory contribution of case study research designs," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 10(2), pages 281-305, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katerina Gkalitsiou & Dimosthenis Kotsopoulos, 2023. "When the Going Gets Tough, Leaders Use Metaphors and Storytelling: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study on Communication in the Context of COVID-19 and Ukraine Crises," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-42, April.
    2. Christoph Friedrich & Daniel Feser, 2024. "Combining knowledge bases for small wins in peripheral regions. An analysis of the role of innovation intermediaries in sustainability transitions," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 44(2), pages 211-236, June.
    3. Robin Hogrefe & Sabine Bohnet-Joschko, 2023. "The Social Dimension of Corporate Sustainability: Review of an Evolving Research Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Markéta Supa & Lucie Römer & Vojtěch Hodboď, 2022. "Including the Experiences of Children and Youth in Media Education," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 391-399.
    5. Anastasia Christodoulou & Kevin Cullinane, 0. "Potential for, and drivers of, private voluntary initiatives for the decarbonisation of short sea shipping: evidence from a Swedish ferry line," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    6. Friedrich, Christoph & Feser, Daniel, 2021. "Combining knowledge bases for system innovation in regions: Insights from an East German case study," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 430, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    7. Zhipeng Zhou & Chaozhi Li & Chuanmin Mi & Lingfei Qian, 2019. "Exploring the Potential Use of Near-Miss Information to Improve Construction Safety Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Anastasia Christodoulou & Kevin Cullinane, 2021. "Potential for, and drivers of, private voluntary initiatives for the decarbonisation of short sea shipping: evidence from a Swedish ferry line," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(4), pages 632-654, December.
    9. repec:mgs:iojome:v:3:y:2023:i:1:p:17-48 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Katharina Spraul & Julia Thaler, 2020. "Partnering for good? An analysis of how to achieve sustainability-related outcomes in public–private partnerships," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(2), pages 485-511, July.
    11. Engwall, Mats & Kaulio, Matti & Karakaya, Emrah & Miterev, Maxim & Berlin, Daniel, 2021. "Experimental networks for business model innovation: A way for incumbents to navigate sustainability transitions?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    12. Zakayo, Rachel, 2021. "An exploration of the factors that determine the gendered adaptation to climate variability in Kilosa District, Tanzania," Tanzania Journal of Community Development (TAJOCODE), Department of Agricultural Extension and Community Development, Sokoine University of Agriculture, vol. 1(1), pages 37-51, August.
    13. Feldmann Anna, 2021. "The 5 P’s to success in intrapreneurial programs," Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen, De Gruyter, vol. 71(1), pages 5-37, March.
    14. Currie, Denise & McCracken, Martin & Venter, Katharine, 2022. "Avoiding the vicious cycle, engendering the virtuous circle: Understanding the interaction of human, social and organizational capitals in non-profit and voluntary organizations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 17-28.
    15. Wiesmeth, Hans, 2020. "Stakeholder engagement for environmental innovations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 310-320.
    16. Erik G. Hansen & Ferdinand Revellio, 2020. "Circular value creation architectures: Make, ally, buy, or laissez‐faire," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(6), pages 1250-1273, December.
    17. Boris Otto & Matthias Jarke, 2019. "Designing a multi-sided data platform: findings from the International Data Spaces case," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(4), pages 561-580, December.
    18. Anh Huu Nguyen & Thinh Gia Hoang & Vu Minh Ngo & Loan Quynh Thi Nguyen & Huan Huu Nguyen, 2023. "Sustainability-oriented supply chain finance in Vietnam: insights from multiple case studies," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 259-279, March.
    19. Krzywdzinski, Martin & Butollo, Florian, 2022. "Combining Experiential Knowledge and Artificial Intelligence. The Digital Transformation of a Traditional Machine-Building Company," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 33(2), pages 161-184.
    20. Mouzas, Stefanos, 2022. "What drives business transformation? Evidence from manufacturer-retailer networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 282-293.
    21. Elisa Martina Martinelli & Maria Cristina Farioli & Annalisa Tunisini, 2021. "New companies’ DNA: the heritage of the past industrial revolutions in digital transformation," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(4), pages 1079-1106, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.