IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibf/acttax/v6y2014i2p11-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Implications Of Project Portfolio Selection

Author

Listed:
  • Guilherme Vitolo
  • Flavio Cipparrone

Abstract

This paper evaluates the relationship between corporate strategy and quantitative financial criteria for choosing the optimal set of projects for the Capital Budget. On the basis of the competitive dynamics of the industry and the corporate strategy, different sets of projects should be selected to compose the project portfolio. The choice of the best criteria for project selection is mandatory, even though it is hard to find in both corporate and academic literature recommendation about which criteria should be selected to fit a predefined strategy. In order to evaluate that, this paper analyzed several combinations of risk and return metrics to compare the resultant set of projects and their strategic implications. The results pointed out that while Net Present Value combined with Value at Risk provided the most relevant results in terms of long term value creation, it is important to figure out how different strategies can be best implemented through portfolios selected by other criteria – e.g., fast returns on investment obtained by the Adjusted Payback Period and high profitability based on the Profitability Index or Internal Rate of Return. Such results present a relevant contribution for managers who typically face with the Capital Budget problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Guilherme Vitolo & Flavio Cipparrone, 2014. "Strategic Implications Of Project Portfolio Selection," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 6(2), pages 11-20.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibf:acttax:v:6:y:2014:i:2:p:11-20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.theibfr2.com/RePEc/ibf/acttax/at-v6n2-2014/AT-V6N2-2014-2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas J. Linsmeier & Neil D. Pearson, 1996. "Risk Measurement: An Introduction to Value at Risk," Finance 9609004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Linsmeier, Thomas J. & Pearson, Neil D., 1996. "Risk measurement: an introduction to value at risk," ACE Reports 14796, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics.
    3. Chen, Qi & Jiang, Wei, 2004. "Positive hurdle rates without asymmetric information," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 1(2), pages 106-112, June.
    4. Janne Gustafsson & Ahti Salo, 2005. "Contingent Portfolio Programming for the Management of Risky Projects," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(6), pages 946-956, December.
    5. Prokopczuk, Marcel & Rachev, Svetlozar T. & Schindlmayr, Gero & Truck, Stefan, 2007. "Quantifying risk in the electricity business: A RAROC-based approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 1033-1049, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laurent El Ghaoui & Maksim Oks & Francois Oustry, 2003. "Worst-Case Value-At-Risk and Robust Portfolio Optimization: A Conic Programming Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 543-556, August.
    2. Javier Calatrava & Alberto Garrido, 2005. "Spot water markets and risk in water supply," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 33(2), pages 131-143, September.
    3. Basak, Suleyman & Shapiro, Alexander, 2001. "Value-at-Risk-Based Risk Management: Optimal Policies and Asset Prices," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 14(2), pages 371-405.
    4. Tarek Ibrahim Eldomiaty & Mohamed Hashem Rashwan & Mohamed Bahaa El Din & Waleed Tayel, 2016. "Firm, industry and economic determinants of working capital at risk," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(04), pages 1-29, December.
    5. Mei-Ling Tang & Trung K. Do, 2019. "In search of robust methods for multi-currency portfolio construction by value at risk," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 26(1), pages 107-126, March.
    6. Sehgal, Ruchika & Sharma, Amita & Mansini, Renata, 2023. "Worst-case analysis of Omega-VaR ratio optimization model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    7. Rossignolo, Adrian F. & Fethi, Meryem Duygun & Shaban, Mohamed, 2012. "Value-at-Risk models and Basel capital charges," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 303-319.
    8. Marcello Spanò, 2013. "Theoretical explanations of corporate hedging," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 3(7), pages 84-102, July.
    9. Marcello Spanò, 2013. "Theoretical explanations of corporate hedging," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 3(7), pages 84-102, July.
    10. Kaplanski, Guy & Kroll, Yoram, 2002. "VaR Risk Measures versus Traditional Risk Measures: an Analysis and Survey," MPRA Paper 80070, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Billio, Monica & Pelizzon, Loriana, 2000. "Value-at-Risk: a multivariate switching regime approach," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 7(5), pages 531-554, December.
    12. Joel A. Shapiro & Warren B. Powell & David Bernstein, 2001. "A Flexible Java Representation for Uncertainty in Online Operations-Research Models," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 29-55, February.
    13. Marián Rimarčík, 2005. "Porovnanie prístupov na výpočet hodnoty v riziku menových portfólií [Comparison of approaches for value-at-risk estimation of foreign exchange portfolios]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2005(3), pages 323-336.
    14. Goel, Anubha & Sharma, Amita, 2020. "Mixed value-at-risk and its numerical investigation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 541(C).
    15. Su, Ender & Wong, Kai Wen, 2018. "Measuring bank downside systemic risk in Taiwan," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 172-193.
    16. Ioana Popescu, 2007. "Robust Mean-Covariance Solutions for Stochastic Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(1), pages 98-112, February.
    17. Muzaffer Akat & Cahit Memis, 2018. "Will Switching From The Var To The Expected Shortfall Provide The Efficiency In The Capital Adequacy? Evidence From The Fx Positions," Eurasian Journal of Business and Management, Eurasian Publications, vol. 6(2), pages 1-13.
    18. Chen, H. & Pau, L-F., 2007. "Individual Tariffs for Mobile Services: Analysis of Operator Business and Risk Consequences," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2007-052-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    19. Yass A. Alkafaji & Nauzer Balsara & Judith N. Aburmishan, 2006. "FASB’s Statement No. 133 on Derivatives and Barings Bank: The Case for Value at Risk (VAR)," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 19(2), pages 94-104, September.
    20. Olkhov, Victor, 2021. "To VaR, or Not to VaR, That is the Question," MPRA Paper 105458, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Capital Budget; Project Portfolio Management; Project Portfolio Strategy; Project Selection; Monte Carlo Simulation; Investment Decision Criteria;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G31 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Capital Budgeting; Fixed Investment and Inventory Studies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibf:acttax:v:6:y:2014:i:2:p:11-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mercedes Jalbert (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.