IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v324y2003i1p81-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk and utility in portfolio optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Cohen, Morrel H.
  • Natoli, Vincent D.

Abstract

Modern portfolio theory (MPT) addresses the problem of determining the optimum allocation of investment resources among a set of candidate assets. In the original mean-variance approach of Markowitz, volatility is taken as a proxy for risk, conflating uncertainty with risk. There have been many subsequent attempts to alleviate that weakness which, typically, combine utility and risk. We present here a modification of MPT based on the inclusion of separate risk and utility criteria. We define risk as the probability of failure to meet a pre-established investment goal. We define utility as the expectation of a utility function with positive and decreasing marginal value as a function of yield. The emphasis throughout is on long investment horizons for which risk-free assets do not exist. Analytic results are presented for a Gaussian probability distribution. Risk-utility relations are explored via empirical stock-price data, and an illustrative portfolio is optimized using the empirical data.

Suggested Citation

  • Cohen, Morrel H. & Natoli, Vincent D., 2003. "Risk and utility in portfolio optimization," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 324(1), pages 81-88.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:324:y:2003:i:1:p:81-88
    DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4371(02)01957-X
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037843710201957X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/S0378-4371(02)01957-X?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas J. Linsmeier & Neil D. Pearson, 1996. "Risk Measurement: An Introduction to Value at Risk," Finance 9609004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. J. Tobin, 1958. "Liquidity Preference as Behavior Towards Risk," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 25(2), pages 65-86.
    3. Linsmeier, Thomas J. & Pearson, Neil D., 1996. "Risk measurement: an introduction to value at risk," ACE Reports 14796, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eliazar, Iddo, 2004. "Doubling an investment," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 331(1), pages 240-252.
    2. Gökgöz, Fazıl & Atmaca, Mete Emin, 2017. "Portfolio optimization under lower partial moments in emerging electricity markets: Evidence from Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 437-449.
    3. Bohdan Yu. Kyshakevych & Anatoliy K. Prykarpatsky & Denis Blackmore & Ivan P. Tverdokhlib, 2010. "Statistically Optimal Strategy Analysis of a Competing Portfolio Market with a Polyvariant Profit Function," Papers 1005.2661, arXiv.org.
    4. Meryem Masmoudi & Fouad Ben Abdelaziz, 2018. "Portfolio selection problem: a review of deterministic and stochastic multiple objective programming models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 267(1), pages 335-352, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laurent El Ghaoui & Maksim Oks & Francois Oustry, 2003. "Worst-Case Value-At-Risk and Robust Portfolio Optimization: A Conic Programming Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 543-556, August.
    2. Javier Calatrava & Alberto Garrido, 2005. "Spot water markets and risk in water supply," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 33(2), pages 131-143, September.
    3. Basak, Suleyman & Shapiro, Alexander, 2001. "Value-at-Risk-Based Risk Management: Optimal Policies and Asset Prices," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 14(2), pages 371-405.
    4. Tarek Ibrahim Eldomiaty & Mohamed Hashem Rashwan & Mohamed Bahaa El Din & Waleed Tayel, 2016. "Firm, industry and economic determinants of working capital at risk," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(04), pages 1-29, December.
    5. Mei-Ling Tang & Trung K. Do, 2019. "In search of robust methods for multi-currency portfolio construction by value at risk," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 26(1), pages 107-126, March.
    6. Guilherme Vitolo & Flavio Cipparrone, 2014. "Strategic Implications Of Project Portfolio Selection," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 6(2), pages 11-20.
    7. Sehgal, Ruchika & Sharma, Amita & Mansini, Renata, 2023. "Worst-case analysis of Omega-VaR ratio optimization model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    8. Rossignolo, Adrian F. & Fethi, Meryem Duygun & Shaban, Mohamed, 2012. "Value-at-Risk models and Basel capital charges," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 303-319.
    9. Marcello Spanò, 2013. "Theoretical explanations of corporate hedging," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 3(7), pages 84-102, July.
    10. Marcello Spanò, 2013. "Theoretical explanations of corporate hedging," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 3(7), pages 84-102, July.
    11. Kaplanski, Guy & Kroll, Yoram, 2002. "VaR Risk Measures versus Traditional Risk Measures: an Analysis and Survey," MPRA Paper 80070, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Billio, Monica & Pelizzon, Loriana, 2000. "Value-at-Risk: a multivariate switching regime approach," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 7(5), pages 531-554, December.
    13. Joel A. Shapiro & Warren B. Powell & David Bernstein, 2001. "A Flexible Java Representation for Uncertainty in Online Operations-Research Models," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 29-55, February.
    14. Marián Rimarčík, 2005. "Porovnanie prístupov na výpočet hodnoty v riziku menových portfólií [Comparison of approaches for value-at-risk estimation of foreign exchange portfolios]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2005(3), pages 323-336.
    15. Goel, Anubha & Sharma, Amita, 2020. "Mixed value-at-risk and its numerical investigation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 541(C).
    16. Su, Ender & Wong, Kai Wen, 2018. "Measuring bank downside systemic risk in Taiwan," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 172-193.
    17. Ioana Popescu, 2007. "Robust Mean-Covariance Solutions for Stochastic Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(1), pages 98-112, February.
    18. Muzaffer Akat & Cahit Memis, 2018. "Will Switching From The Var To The Expected Shortfall Provide The Efficiency In The Capital Adequacy? Evidence From The Fx Positions," Eurasian Journal of Business and Management, Eurasian Publications, vol. 6(2), pages 1-13.
    19. Chen, H. & Pau, L-F., 2007. "Individual Tariffs for Mobile Services: Analysis of Operator Business and Risk Consequences," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2007-052-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    20. Yass A. Alkafaji & Nauzer Balsara & Judith N. Aburmishan, 2006. "FASB’s Statement No. 133 on Derivatives and Barings Bank: The Case for Value at Risk (VAR)," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 19(2), pages 94-104, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:324:y:2003:i:1:p:81-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.