IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibf/acttax/v5y2013i1p85-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indirect Labor Costs And Implications For Overhead Allocation

Author

Listed:
  • Bea Chiang

Abstract

Cost accounting typically allocates indirect labor cost to cost object based on direct labor hours. The allocation process implicitly assumes that indirect labor costs vary proportionally with direct labor hours. The assumption of a linear relationship between indirect and direct labor is particularly suspicious at low production volume levels because there tends to be a fixed component in indirect labor. The linearity assumption is also challenged by recent increasing complexity of indirect labor tasks. As automation technology replaces some work of the of traditional labor, the cost of non-production workers becomes an important element of manufacturing overhead and it may not be related to labor hours in a simple linear manner. A model is derived to show the relationship between indirect labor overhead and direct labor hours under different conditions. The implication for the allocation of indirect labor overhead is also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Bea Chiang, 2013. "Indirect Labor Costs And Implications For Overhead Allocation," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 5(1), pages 85-96.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibf:acttax:v:5:y:2013:i:1:p:85-96
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.theibfr2.com/RePEc/ibf/acttax/at-v5n1-2013/AT-V5N1-2013-9.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gunasekaran, A. & Korukonda, A. R. & Virtanen, I. & Yli-Olli, P., 1994. "Improving productivity and quality in manufacturing organizations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 169-183, September.
    2. Noreen, Eric & Noreen, Eric & Soderstrom, Naomi, 1994. "Are overhead costs strictly proportional to activity? : Evidence from hospital departments," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1-2), pages 255-278, January.
    3. Wacker, John G. & Yang, Chen-Lung & Sheu, Chwen, 2006. "Productivity of production labor, non-production labor, and capital: An international study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 863-872, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sáenz-Royo, Carlos & Salas-Fumás, Vicente, 2014. "Long- and short-term efficiency in an automobile factory: An econometric case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 98-107.
    2. Demeter, Krisztina & Chikán, Attila & Matyusz, Zsolt, 2011. "Labour productivity change: Drivers, business impact and macroeconomic moderators," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 215-223, May.
    3. Bhimani, Alnoor & Sivabalan, Prabhu & Soonawalla, Kazbi, 2018. "A study of the linkages between rolling budget forms, uncertainty and strategy," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 306-323.
    4. Ittner, Christopher D. & Larcker, David F., 2001. "Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-3), pages 349-410, December.
    5. Cristiana Cattaneo & Gaia Bassani, 2020. "Sticky costs: le determinanti e le sfide per manager e accademici," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2020(Suppl. 1), pages 103-126.
    6. Homburg, Carsten, 2005. "Using relative profits as an alternative to activity-based costing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 387-397, March.
    7. Josep Maria Argiles Bosch & Josep Garcia Blandon, 2007. "Cost stickiness revisited: Empirical aplication for farms," Working Papers in Economics 187, Universitat de Barcelona. Espai de Recerca en Economia.
    8. Maria-Victòria Sánchez-Rebull & Angels Niñerola & Ana-Beatriz Hernández-Lara, 2023. "After 30 Years, What Has Happened to Activity-Based Costing? A Systematic Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    9. Eva Labro, 2004. "The Cost Effects of Component Commonality: A Literature Review Through a Management-Accounting Lens," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(4), pages 358-367, June.
    10. Banker, Rajiv D. & Potter, Gordon & Schroeder, Roger G., 1995. "An empirical analysis of manufacturing overhead cost drivers," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 115-137, February.
    11. Z. Degraeve & Eva Labro & F. Roodhooft, 2005. "Constructing a Total Cost of Ownership supplier selection methodology based on Activity-Based Costing and mathematical programming," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 3-27.
    12. Chia-Lin CHANG & Stéphane ROBIN, 2006. "Using the Asymptotically Ideal Model to estimate the impact of knowledge on labour productivity: An application to Taiwan in the 1990s," Working Papers of BETA 2006-34, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    13. Sanjay Kallapur & Leslie Eldenburg, 2005. "Uncertainty, Real Options, and Cost Behavior: Evidence from Washington State Hospitals," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(5), pages 735-752, December.
    14. Gehringer, Agnieszka, 2015. "Uneven effects of financial liberalization on productivity growth in the EU: Evidence from a dynamic panel investigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 334-346.
    15. S. Hoozée & W. Bruggeman, 2007. "Towards explaining cost estimation errors in time equation-based costing," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 07/486, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    16. Fernanda Bravo & Marcus Braun & Vivek Farias & Retsef Levi & Christine Lynch & John Tumolo & Richard Whyte, 2021. "Optimization-driven framework to understand health care network costs and resource allocation," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 640-660, September.
    17. Wacker, John G. & Yang, Chen-Lung & Sheu, Chwen, 2006. "Productivity of production labor, non-production labor, and capital: An international study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 863-872, October.
    18. Larsen, Jytte & Skjoldborg, Ulla Slothuus, 2004. "Comparing systems for costing hospital treatments: The case of stable angina pectoris," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 293-307, March.
    19. Yamane, Yasuo & Takahashi, Katsuhiko & Hamada, Kunihiro & Morikawa, Katsumi & Nur Bahagia, Senator & Diawati, Lucia & Cakravastia, Andi, 2015. "Developing a plant system prediction model for technology transfer," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 119-128.
    20. Tingyong Zhong & Fangcheng Sun & Haiyan Zhou & Jeoung Yul Lee, 2020. "Business Strategy, State-Owned Equity and Cost Stickiness: Evidence from Chinese Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Indirect Labor Cost; Labor Cost; Overhead Allocation; Cost Accounting; Indirect Labor Cost Allocation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J3 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs
    • M2 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibf:acttax:v:5:y:2013:i:1:p:85-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mercedes Jalbert (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.