IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v5y2017i3p28-d106647.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Soft Systems Approach to Knowledge Worker Productivity—Analysis of the Problem Situation

Author

Listed:
  • Helga Guðrún Óskarsdóttir

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Iceland, Reykjavik 101, Iceland)

  • Guðmundur Valur Oddsson

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Iceland, Reykjavik 101, Iceland)

Abstract

Low knowledge worker productivity is an important problem that needs to be addressed. Current research addressing this problem is fragmented and deals with different isolated elements of the problem. There is a need for a holistic approach to knowledge worker productivity. This paper takes the first steps of a holistic approach to knowledge worker productivity by using soft systems methodology to describe the problem situation. The main challenge of this research was the abstraction of the results from two literature reviews into simple rich pictures and specific root definitions to identify the fundamentals of knowledge worker productivity. The problem situation was explored from the perspective of two problem owners, the organization and the individual knowledge worker. The rich picture from the perspective of the organization highlighted that the organization must communicate what they perceive as value and create a work environment that promotes collaboration, encourages knowledge sharing, motivates and fulfills the needs of their knowledge workers. The rich picture from the perspective of the individual knowledge worker highlighted the fact that knowledge workers need to manage their personal resources, be effective and efficient to maximize their own productivity. This paper attempts to integrate these two perspectives into a holistic view.

Suggested Citation

  • Helga Guðrún Óskarsdóttir & Guðmundur Valur Oddsson, 2017. "A Soft Systems Approach to Knowledge Worker Productivity—Analysis of the Problem Situation," Economies, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-27, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:5:y:2017:i:3:p:28-:d:106647
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/5/3/28/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/5/3/28/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sharmila Jayasingam & Muhiniswari Govindasamy & Sharan Kaur Garib Singh, 2016. "Instilling affective commitment: insights on what makes knowledge workers want to stay," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 39(3), pages 266-288, March.
    2. Gunasekaran, A. & Korukonda, A. R. & Virtanen, I. & Yli-Olli, P., 1994. "Improving productivity and quality in manufacturing organizations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 169-183, September.
    3. Alfonso Gambardella & Claudio Panico & Giovanni Valentini, 2015. "Strategic incentives to human capital," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 37-52, January.
    4. Yoram M. Kalman & Gilad Ravid, 2015. "Filing, piling, and everything in between: The dynamics of E-mail inbox management," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(12), pages 2540-2552, December.
    5. Chin-Hui Lai, 2015. "Applying knowledge flow mining to group recommendation methods for task-based groups," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(3), pages 545-563, March.
    6. Joseph Barjis & Ashish Gupta & Ramesh Sharda, 2011. "Knowledge work and communication challenges in networked enterprises," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 13(5), pages 615-619, November.
    7. Duen-Ren Liu & Chin-Hui Lai & Ya-Ting Chen, 2012. "Document recommendations based on knowledge flows: A hybrid of personalized and group-based approaches," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(10), pages 2100-2117, October.
    8. Duen‐Ren Liu & Chin‐Hui Lai & Ya‐Ting Chen, 2012. "Document recommendations based on knowledge flows: A hybrid of personalized and group‐based approaches," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(10), pages 2100-2117, October.
    9. Keneley, Monica, 2007. "Supervising outworkers: the case of the AMP and the sale of industrial life insurance 1905-1940," Working Papers eco_2007_10, Deakin University, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Pietruszka-Ortyl & Małgorzata Ćwiek, 2021. "Social Facilitators of Specialist Knowledge Dispersion in the Digital Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Helga Guðrún Óskarsdóttir & Guðmundur Valur Oddsson & Jón Þór Sturluson & Rögnvaldur Jóhann Sæmundsson, 2021. "A Soft Systems Approach to Knowledge Worker Productivity: A Purposeful Activity Model for the Individual," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-26, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sharon Belenzon & Ulya Tsolmon, 2016. "Market frictions and the competitive advantage of internal labor markets," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(7), pages 1280-1303, July.
    2. Pardeep Gupta & Sachit Vardhan, 2016. "Optimizing OEE, productivity and production cost for improving sales volume in an automobile industry through TPM: a case study," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(10), pages 2976-2988, May.
    3. David R. Williams & Betty S. Coffey & Carlton C. Young, 2018. "Human capital and agency effects on CEO compensation of IPO biopharmaceutical firms and the market’s response," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 22(2), pages 315-337, June.
    4. Jana Gallus & Bruno S. Frey, 2016. "Awards: A strategic management perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(8), pages 1699-1714, August.
    5. Bryan Hong, 2020. "Power to the outsiders: External hiring and decision authority allocation within organizations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(9), pages 1628-1652, September.
    6. Andrea Morrison, 2018. "Spinoffs, parents, and institutions: Evidence from the Italian motorcycle industry," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1840, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Nov 2018.
    7. Anna Pietruszka-Ortyl & Małgorzata Cwiek, 2021. "Trust in the Diffusion of Professional Knowledge," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 989-1009.
    8. Demeter, Krisztina & Chikán, Attila & Matyusz, Zsolt, 2011. "Labour productivity change: Drivers, business impact and macroeconomic moderators," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 215-223, May.
    9. Anna Pietruszka-Ortyl & Małgorzata Ćwiek & Bernard Ziębicki & Anna Wójcik-Karpacz, 2021. "Organizational Culture as a Prerequisite for Knowledge Transfer among IT Professionals: The Case of Energy Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-32, December.
    10. Yong Sun & Wenan Tan & Lingxia Li & Weiming Shen & Zhuming Bi & Xiaoming Hu, 2016. "A new method to identify collaborative partners in social service provider networks," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 565-578, June.
    11. Leone, Maria Isabella & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio & Natalicchio, Angelo, 2022. "Boundary spanning through external technology acquisition: The moderating role of star scientists and upstream alliances," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    12. William Sheng Liu & Frank Wogbe Agbola & Janet Ama Dzator, 2016. "The impact of FDI spillover effects on total factor productivity in the Chinese electronic industry: a panel data analysis," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 217-234, April.
    13. Gabriela Viale Pereira & Elsa Estevez & Diego Cardona & Carlos Chesñevar & Pablo Collazzo-Yelpo & Maria Alexandra Cunha & Eduardo Henrique Diniz & Alex Antonio Ferraresi & Frida Marina Fischer & Flúvi, 2020. "South American Expert Roundtable: Increasing Adaptive Governance Capacity for Coping with Unintended Side Effects of Digital Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-47, January.
    14. Bruno Cassiman & Giovanni Valentini, 2016. "Open innovation: Are inbound and outbound knowledge flows really complementary?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 1034-1046, June.
    15. Guijie Zhang & Luning Liu & Fangfang Wei, 2019. "Key nodes mining in the inventor–author knowledge diffusion network," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(3), pages 721-735, March.
    16. Letmathe, Peter & Noll, Elisabeth, 2024. "Analysis of email management strategies and their effects on email management performance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    17. Fursov, Konstantin & Thurner, Thomas & Nefedova, Alena, 2017. "What user-innovators do that others don't: A study of daily practices," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 153-160.
    18. Prithwiraj (Raj) Choudhury & Cirrus Foroughi & Barbara Larson, 2021. "Work‐from‐anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(4), pages 655-683, April.
    19. Isabel Maria Bodas Freitas & Bart Verspagen, 2017. "The motivations, institutions and organization of university-industry collaborations in the Netherlands," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 379-412, July.
    20. Henry Sauermann, 2017. "Fire in the Belly? Employee Motives and Innovative Performance in Startups versus Established Firms," NBER Working Papers 23099, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:5:y:2017:i:3:p:28-:d:106647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.