IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/complx/7374307.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the Complex Construct of Macroergonomic Compatibility: A Manufacturing System Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Arturo Realyvásquez
  • Aide A. Maldonado-Macías

Abstract

Macroergonomic compatibility (MC) refers to the extent to which macroergonomic factors and elements (MFEs) interact positively with humans. It is one of the most complex constructs to measure in work systems and in ergonomics. The goal of this paper is to determine the levels of MC in a manufacturing system. As methods, we use the macroergonomic compatibility index (MCI) and the Macroergonomic Compatibility Questionnaire (MCQ). The MCQ was administered in its three versions (i.e., worker version, expert version, and medical department version) to collect data about the macroergonomic practices implemented in the manufacturing company. Regarding results, all the macroergonomic factors and most of the macroergonomic elements showed a low level of MC; that is, MCI < 0.7. Only macroergonomic elements Education, Knowledge, and Skills reached a medium level; namely, MCI = 0.709. The factor with the highest level of MC was the Person factor (MCI = 0.328). Similarly, the whole manufacturing system showed a low level of MC. In conclusion, the studied manufacturing company requires urgent macroergonomic interventions. Also, we found that the MCI can effectively measure the level of MC of MFEs and can guide the implementation of macroergonomic practices (MPs) and explain the MC construct.

Suggested Citation

  • Arturo Realyvásquez & Aide A. Maldonado-Macías, 2018. "Measuring the Complex Construct of Macroergonomic Compatibility: A Manufacturing System Case Study," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-10, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:hin:complx:7374307
    DOI: 10.1155/2018/7374307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/8503/2018/7374307.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/8503/2018/7374307.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2018/7374307?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin, Ching-Torng & Chiu, Hero & Chu, Po-Young, 2006. "Agility index in the supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 285-299, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sujan Piya & Ahm Shamsuzzoha & Mohammad Khadem & Nasr Al-Hinai, 2020. "Identification of Critical Factors and Their Interrelationships to Design Agile Supply Chain: Special Focus to Oil and Gas Industries," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(3), pages 263-281, September.
    2. Ganga, Gilberto Miller Devós & Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar Ribeiro, 2011. "A fuzzy logic approach to supply chain performance management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 177-187, November.
    3. Monideepa Tarafdar & Sufian Qrunfleh, 2017. "Agile supply chain strategy and supply chain performance: complementary roles of supply chain practices and information systems capability for agility," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(4), pages 925-938, February.
    4. Azevedo, Susana G. & Govindan, Kannan & Carvalho, Helena & Cruz-Machado, V., 2012. "An integrated model to assess the leanness and agility of the automotive industry," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 85-94.
    5. Brusset, Xavier, 2016. "Does supply chain visibility enhance agility?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P1), pages 46-59.
    6. Siliacus Salvatory & Revocatus L. Machunda & Tulinave B. Mwamila, 2022. "An Evaluation of Sustainability Potential of Existing Septic Systems: A Fuzzy-Based Indexing Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, May.
    7. Wu, Chong & Barnes, David, 2010. "Formulating partner selection criteria for agile supply chains: A Dempster-Shafer belief acceptability optimisation approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 284-293, June.
    8. Yusuf, Yahaya Y. & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Musa, Ahmed & Dauda, Mohammed & El-Berishy, Nagham M. & Cang, Shuang, 2014. "A relational study of supply chain agility, competitiveness and business performance in the oil and gas industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 531-543.
    9. Slawomir Skiba & Adrianna Karas, 2022. "The Changing Role of a Freight Forwarder in Modern Supply Chains," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 341-351.
    10. Pinho, Celso R.A. & Pinho, Maria Luiza C.A. & Deligonul, Seyda Z. & Tamer Cavusgil, S., 2022. "The agility construct in the literature: Conceptualization and bibliometric assessment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 517-532.
    11. Qrunfleh, Sufian & Tarafdar, Monideepa, 2014. "Supply chain information systems strategy: Impacts on supply chain performance and firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 340-350.
    12. Salma Benchekroun & V. G. Venkatesh & Ilham Dkhissi & D. Jinil Persis & Arunmozhi Manimuthu & M. Suresh & V. Raja Sreedharan, 2023. "Managing the retail operations in the COVID‐19 pandemic: Evidence from Morocco," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(1), pages 424-447, January.
    13. V. Vaishnavi & M. Suresh, 2020. "Assessing the Readiness Level of Healthcare for Implementing Agility Using Fuzzy Logic Approach," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(2), pages 163-189, June.
    14. Hubert Elisé Fotso, 2022. "Die Leistungsfähigkeit agiler KMU auf dem Prüfstand der Ungewissheit: Sondierungsstudie in einem Dienstleistungs-KMU [The performance of agile SMEs put to the test of uncertainty: Exploratory study," Working Papers hal-03721715, HAL.
    15. Lucie Kaňovská & Veronika Bumberová, 2021. "The Differences in the Propensity of Providing Smart Services by SMEs from the Electrical Engineering Industry with Regard to Their Cooperation and Innovation Flexibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, April.
    16. Bottani, Eleonora, 2009. "A fuzzy QFD approach to achieve agility," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 380-391, June.
    17. Ganguly, Anirban & Nilchiani, Roshanak & Farr, John V., 2009. "Evaluating agility in corporate enterprises," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(2), pages 410-423, April.
    18. Nikolaus Kangas & Hanna Kropsu-Vehkapera & Harri Haapasalo & Tuomo Kinnunen, 2013. "Empirical Aspects on Defining Product Data for Rapid Productisation," International Journal of Synergy and Research, ToKnowPress, vol. 2(2), pages 109-130.
    19. Shams, Riad & Vrontis, Demetris & Belyaeva, Zhanna & Ferraris, Alberto & Czinkota, Michael R., 2021. "Strategic agility in international business: A conceptual framework for “agile” multinationals," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1).
    20. Benameur Dahinine & Abderrazak Laghouag & Wassila Bensahel & Majed Alsolamy & Tarek Guendouz, 2024. "Evaluating Performance Measurement Metrics for Lean and Agile Supply Chain Strategies in Large Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-19, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:complx:7374307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.