IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jworld/v5y2024i4p70-1403d1543198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Waqf : An Advanced Approach to Combating Agricultural Land Fragmentation in Islamic Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Alaa Al-Tulaibawi

    (Department of Applied Economics, University of Valladolid, 47002 Valladolid, Spain)

  • Pablo de Frutos Madrazo

    (Department of Applied Economics, University of Valladolid, 47002 Valladolid, Spain)

  • Pedro Antonio Martín-Cervantes

    (Department of Financial Economics and Accounting, University of Valladolid, 47002 Valladolid, Spain)

Abstract

This paper addresses the issue of agricultural land fragmentation in Islamic countries. In the se countries, agricultural land is fragmented into tiny and unproductive holdings. Fragmentation of agricultural holdings reduces production due to difficulties in applying modern technology, lack of access to loans, and the challenges in marketing small quantities. The inheritance system, based on Islamic law, is one of the biggest reasons for land fragmentation. Previous complex laws to address land fragmentation often conflicted with national constitutions or Islamic law, making their implementation difficult. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining qualitative analysis with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to examine differences in productivity and operational costs per hectare under various land management systems. The findings demonstrate that implementing waqf (endowment) as a land management strategy can significantly mitigate land fragmentation. Waqf preserves agricultural land as a single, indivisible entity, allowing for long-term planning, farm expansion, and sustainable investment. This approach enhances productivity and supports sustainable agricultural development. This study concludes that waqf aligns with Islamic principles and offers a practical, culturally appropriate solution to land fragmentation. By mitigating fragmentation and promoting sustainable development, waqf ensures continuity, supports agricultural growth, and contributes to broader development goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Alaa Al-Tulaibawi & Pablo de Frutos Madrazo & Pedro Antonio Martín-Cervantes, 2024. "Waqf : An Advanced Approach to Combating Agricultural Land Fragmentation in Islamic Countries," World, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:5:y:2024:i:4:p:70-1403:d:1543198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/5/4/70/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/5/4/70/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guang Wan & Enjiang Cheng, 2001. "Effects of land fragmentation and returns to scale in the Chinese farming sector," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 183-194.
    2. Ellis,Frank, 1992. "Agricultural Policies in Developing Countries," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521395847, January.
    3. A. Parikh & K. Shah, 1994. "Measurement Of Technical Efficiency In The North‐West Frontier Province Of Pakistan," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1), pages 132-138, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhamad Farhan Bin Ishak & Noor Syahidah Binti Mohamad Akhir, 2025. "Agricultural Waqf: Concept, Benefits, and Challenges in the Contemporary Context," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(14), pages 216-227, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laure Latruffe & Laurent Piet, 2013. "Does land fragmentation affect farm performance? A case study from Brittany," Working Papers hal-01208908, HAL.
    2. Laure Latruffe & Laurent Piet, 2012. "Does land fragmentation affect farm performance?A french Breton case study," Post-Print hal-01208907, HAL.
    3. Jarmila LAZIKOVA & Lubica RUMANOVSKA & Ivan TAKAC & Zuzana LAZIKOVA, 2017. "Land fragmentation and efforts to prevent it in Slovak legislation," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(12), pages 559-568.
    4. Laure Latruffe & Laurent Piet, 2013. "Does land fragmentation affect farm performance?," Working Papers hal-01208858, HAL.
    5. Laure Latruffe & Laurent Piet, 2013. "Does land fragmentation affect farm performance? A case study from Brittany, France," Working Papers SMART 13-04, INRAE UMR SMART.
    6. Kawasaki, Kentaro, 2011. "The Impact of Land Fragmentation on Rice Production Cost and Input Use," Japanese Journal of Agricultural Economics (formerly Japanese Journal of Rural Economics), Agricultural Economics Society of Japan (AESJ), vol. 13, pages 1-14.
    7. Tomomi Tanaka, 2005. "Resource allocation with spatial externalities: Experiments on land consolidation," Experimental 0511004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Orea, Luis & Pérez, Jose A. & Roibás, David, 2013. "Evaluating the double effect of land fragmentation on technology choice and dairy farm productivity: A latent class model approach," Efficiency Series Papers 2013/08, University of Oviedo, Department of Economics, Oviedo Efficiency Group (OEG).
    9. Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda, 2012. "Targeted Subsidies and Private Market Participation: An Assessment of Fertilizer Demand in Nigeria:," IFPRI discussion papers 1194, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    10. Sheahan, Megan & Black, Roy & Jayne, T.S., 2013. "Are Kenyan farmers under-utilizing fertilizer? Implications for input intensification strategies and research," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 39-52.
    11. Munir Ahmad & Sarfraz Khan Qureshi, 1999. "Recent Evidence on Farm Size and Land Productivity: Implications for Public Policy," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 38(4), pages 1135-1153.
    12. Zhihai Yang & Amin W. Mugera & Ning Yin & Yumeng Wang, 2018. "Soil conservation practices and production efficiency of smallholder farms in Central China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1517-1533, August.
    13. Salah M. Elawad & Elrashied E. Elkhiedir & Mahmoud A. Amassaib & Ahmed M. El Naim, 2017. "Government Policies and Food Security in Sudan (1970-2007): Incentives, Efficiencies and Comparative Advantage for Sorghum Producing in Mechanised Rain-fed Subsector," Academic Journal of Life Sciences, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 3(3), pages 12-17, 03-2017.
    14. Nguyen, Huy, 2014. "The effect of land fragmentation on labor allocation and the economic diversity of farm households: The case of Vietnam," MPRA Paper 57521, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Kremer, Michael & Duflo, Esther & Robinson, Jonathan, 2009. "Nudging Farmers to Utilize Fertilizer: Theory and Experimental Evidence from Kenya," CEPR Discussion Papers 7402, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Tim J. Coelli & George E. Battese, 1996. "Identification Of Factors Which Influence The Technical Inefficiency Of Indian Farmers," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 40(2), pages 103-128, August.
    17. Zhang, Jian & Mishra, Ashok K. & Ma, Xianlei, 2023. "Mechanism of Chinese farmers’ land rental participation: The role of invisible markets and public intervention," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    18. Roumasset, James A., 2006. "The Economics of Agricultural Development: What Have We Learned?," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25598, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Jia, Lili & Petrick, Martin, 2014. "How does land fragmentation affect off-farm labor supply: panel data evidence from China," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 45(3), pages 369-380.
    20. Wang, Yahui & Li, Xiubin & He, Huiyan & Xin, Liangjie & Tan, Minghong, 2020. "How reliable are cultivated land assets as social security for Chinese farmers?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:5:y:2024:i:4:p:70-1403:d:1543198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.