IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jworld/v5y2024i1p1-21d1315953.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Granary to Arts Incubator: An Evolutionary Perspective on the Concept of Food for Thought

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos José Lopes Balsas

    (Independent Researcher, Albany, NY 12203, USA)

Abstract

Does our food for thought come virtually from the internet? When we take a long view, the instant stroke of a keyboard pales in comparison to the centuries-old evolution of real food harvesting and the generation and exchange of ideas, which have resulted in creative capital. The vernacular architecture of the agricultural built environment has almost dematerialized in its transition from the ancient pre-industrial era to the post-truth world, to become almost only an imagined concept. The symbology of the common threshing terrace of a Portuguese remote mountain village can now be found in multiple spaces of the urban realm, including in the metaphor of a community arts incubator’s modus operandi in Albany, New York (USA). How has the concept of food for thought developed and materialized? How has it evolved? And what are some of the expected ways it might be utilized in the future? The purpose of the paper is to trace the evolution of this concept and its elements via the BLC Framework. The methodology employs a time analysis of approximately three centuries to distinguish three distinct evolutionary phases: (i) the pre-industrial era, (ii) the industrial era, and (iii) the information-driven era. The key finding is an up-to-date discussion of the food for thought concept in two distinct geographical worlds and three-time eras, as well as a set of lessons learned according to a protest poem and a rock song. The results are presented in the form of five lessons learned with implications for public policy: the first two lessons pertain to issues of procedural justice as encapsulated in the anonymous ‘The Goose’ poem, while the last three result from a discussion of selected verses in Nick Cave’s ‘Fable of the Brown Ape’ rock song.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos José Lopes Balsas, 2024. "From Granary to Arts Incubator: An Evolutionary Perspective on the Concept of Food for Thought," World, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-21, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:5:y:2024:i:1:p:1-21:d:1315953
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/5/1/1/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/5/1/1/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rhonda Phillips & Jay Stein, 2013. "An Indicator Framework for Linking Historic Preservation and Community Economic Development," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 113(1), pages 1-15, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea R. Roberts, 2020. "Preservation without Representation: Making CLG Programs Vehicles for Inclusive Leadership, Historic Preservation, and Engagement," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Sharafat Ali & Haiyan Xu & Waqas Ahmed & Najid Ahmad & Yasir Ahmed Solangi, 2020. "Metro design and heritage sustainability: conflict analysis using attitude based on options in the graph model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3839-3860, April.
    3. Antonio Nesticò & Pierfrancesco Fiore & Emanuela D’Andria, 2020. "Enhancement of Small Towns in Inland Areas. A Novel Indicators Dataset to Evaluate Sustainable Plans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Antonio Nesticò & Piera Somma, 2019. "Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Methods for the Enhancement of Historical Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-19, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:5:y:2024:i:1:p:1-21:d:1315953. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.