IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jworld/v4y2023i3p26-430d1188405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Stakeholders in the Adoption of Public–Private Partnerships (PPPs) in Municipal Water Infrastructure Projects: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Thulani Mandiriza

    (School of Public Management and Administration, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa)

  • David Johannes Fourie

    (School of Public Management and Administration, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa)

Abstract

South Africa receives insufficient rainfall to meet citizens’ water needs and this is compounded by deficiencies in infrastructure for water services because of inadequate investment and a lack of maintenance. Municipal public–private partnerships (PPPs) for water infrastructure are rarely utilised for several reasons. Central to this paper is the evaluation of the role played by various stakeholders in influencing the adoption and subsequent approval of municipal water PPP projects. This study critically examined the role of each stakeholder and how other stakeholders perceive their effectiveness during the approval process of water PPP projects. The conceptualisation and implementation of PPPs involves managing both the public and private stakeholders to achieve the desired outcomes. These diverse stakeholders have different values, anchored by the need for rent extraction (profit maximisation motive) or self-interest, as advanced by stakeholder theory. By means of structured interviews, participants highlighted the limitations of each stakeholder and how these contribute to the negative perception of future PPPs. The obtained data were triangulated with secondary sources. The findings confirmed the pursuit of self-interest by various stakeholders, impacting the pace of PPP adoption of municipal water projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Thulani Mandiriza & David Johannes Fourie, 2023. "The Role of Stakeholders in the Adoption of Public–Private Partnerships (PPPs) in Municipal Water Infrastructure Projects: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective," World, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:4:y:2023:i:3:p:26-430:d:1188405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/4/3/26/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/4/3/26/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nikolai Mouraviev & Nada K. Kakabadse, 2015. "Public-Private Partnership's Procurement Criteria: The case of managing stakeholders' value creation in Kazakhstan," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(6), pages 769-790, July.
    2. Joanna Węgrzyn & Anna Wojewnik-Filipkowska, 2022. "Stakeholder Analysis and Their Attitude towards PPP Success," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Roehrich, Jens K. & Lewis, Michael A. & George, Gerard, 2014. "Are public–private partnerships a healthy option? A systematic literature review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 110-119.
    4. Philippe Marin, 2009. "Public-Private Partnerships for Urban Water Utilities : A Review of Experiences in Developing Countries," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2703.
    5. George Nwangwu, 2019. "Stakeholder Opposition Risk in Public-Private Partnerships," International Journal of Economics and Financial Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 5(2), pages 36-42, 02-2019.
    6. Opara, Michael & Rouse, Paul, 2019. "The perceived efficacy of public-private partnerships: A study from Canada," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 77-99.
    7. Rahel M. Schomaker, 2020. "Conceptualizing Corruption in Public Private Partnerships," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 807-820, December.
    8. Andrew Davies, 2004. "Moving base into high-value integrated solutions: a value stream approach," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 13(5), pages 727-756, October.
    9. D. Vandaele & D. Rangarajan & P. Gemmel & A. Lievens, 2007. "How to Govern Business Services Exchanges: Contractual and Relational Issues," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 07/446, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    10. Sophie Sturup, 2019. "The Oxford Handbook of Mega Project Management," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 460-465, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sladjana Benkovic & Nemanja Milanovic & Milos Milosavljevic, 2017. "A Framework for the Evaluation of the Feasibility of Public – Private Partnership in Local Government in Serbia," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 14(4), pages 7-23.
    2. Carmen Araquistain Portela, 2020. "Urban utilities and opportunities for the private sector in local energy services in Switzerland," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 21(2), pages 193-218, June.
    3. Siri Jagstedt & Magnus Persson, 2019. "Using Platform Strategies In The Development Of Integrated Product-Service Solutions," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(04), pages 1-36, May.
    4. Judit Oláh & Attila Bai & György Karmazin & Péter Balogh & József Popp, 2017. "The Role Played by Trust and Its Effect on the Competiveness of Logistics Service Providers in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Gallouj, Faïz & Weber, K. Matthias & Stare, Metka & Rubalcaba, Luis, 2015. "The futures of the service economy in Europe: A foresight analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 80-96.
    6. Centobelli, Piera & Cerchione, Roberto & Esposito, Emilio & Shashi,, 2019. "Exploration and exploitation in the development of more entrepreneurial universities: A twisting learning path model of ambidexterity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 172-194.
    7. Claude Ménard, 2013. "Is Public-Private Partnership Obsolete? Assessing the Obstacles and Shortcomings of PPP," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00653090, HAL.
    8. García-Valiñas, María de los Ángeles & González-Gómez, Francisco & Picazo-Tadeo, Andrés J., 2013. "Is the price of water for residential use related to provider ownership? Empirical evidence from Spain," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 59-69.
    9. Rafael Cáceres & Joaquin Guzmán, 2015. "Seeking an innovation structure common to both manufacturing and services," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 9(3), pages 361-379, September.
    10. Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2010. "The Innovation Gap and the Performance Gap in the Service Economies: A Problem for Public Policy," Chapters, in: Faïz Gallouj & Faridah Djellal (ed.), The Handbook of Innovation and Services, chapter 27, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Bernhard Dachs & Sabine Biege & Martin Borowiecki & Gunter Lay & Angela Jäger & Doris Schartinger, 2014. "Servitisation of European manufacturing: evidence from a large scale database," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 5-23, January.
    12. Livio Cricelli & Serena Strazzullo, 2021. "The Economic Aspect of Digital Sustainability: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    13. Gonzalo Maldonado-Guzmán & José Trinidad Marín-Aguilar & Sandra Yesenia Pinzón-Castro, 2017. "Service Innovation in Mexican Small Business," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 7(4), pages 1-1.
    14. Guangbin Wang & Yingxia Xue & Mirosław Jan Skibniewski & Jiule Song & Hao Lu, 2018. "Analysis of Private Investors Conduct Strategies by Governments Supervising Public-Private Partnership Projects in the New Media Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-26, December.
    15. Friesenbichler, Klaus S. & Kügler, Agnes, 2022. "Servitization across countries and sectors: Evidence from world input-output data," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 46(3).
    16. Green, Maxwell H. & Davies, Philip & Ng, Irene C.L., 2017. "Two strands of servitization: A thematic analysis of traditional and customer co-created servitization and future research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 40-53.
    17. Kathryn Furlong, 2012. "Good Water Governance without Good Urban Governance? Regulation, Service Delivery Models, and Local Government," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(11), pages 2721-2741, November.
    18. Vinit Parida & Joakim Wincent, 2019. "Why and how to compete through sustainability: a review and outline of trends influencing firm and network-level transformation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, March.
    19. World Bank, 2015. "Private Sector Delivery of Rural Piped Water Services in Bangladesh," World Bank Publications - Reports 24784, The World Bank Group.
    20. Cao, Fuguo & Li, Runyu & Guo, Shaobo, 2024. "Rhetoric and reality of public-private partnerships in China: A sustainable public procurement perspective," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:4:y:2023:i:3:p:26-430:d:1188405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.